Is homosexuality a perversion?

[TheWizardOfMudd]

According to the neocon stand-in for Weiner (Michael Savage) tonight, it is a perversion because it violates the primary law of nature: For the species to survive. Funny, I didn't hear him mention Chuck Darwin's name.

He explained that for a species to survive it has to procreate. Fine.

But I don't see any procreation resulting from oral sex and anal sex participated in by heterosexuals. Nor do I see it from infertile couples who marry and adopt or couples who do not want children.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that he (whoever he is) is a fuckhead.

Thanks for listening.

[BlackVelvetElvis]

1. Weiner or anyone who would sub for him

is a psychotic freak. Their hang up on homosexuals is very interesting. I sense repressed homosexual desire or else, why would they feel so threatened?

[bluestateguy]

2. reply

Even animals engage in homosexual behavior. As for his remarks on procreation, that may have made sense back in ancient times when procreation was dangerous and difficult and populations were small. Today, however, there are parts of the world where there is a little too much procreating going on--of course, I'm sure Mr. Savage would be happy to know that AIDS has a lot to do with that. In any event, the most ardent fundamentalistwackos believe that sex, even between two married persons, should only be for the purposes of procreation and never for recreation.

[wtmusic]

3. Don't waste your time

Nailing Savage & Co. is pointless and far too easy

[Archae]

4. Another "law of nature" idiot.

Whoever that nitwit filling in for Weiner, he obviously needs to learn some biology and less theocracy.