|
I read the Mars Trilogy as well, I struggled my way all the way thru Green and somehow managed to slog thru blue, but in the end I triumphed! I think they made a purple as well, but I didn't read that, anyhow onto other items.
If you invent something that allows people to do things more efficiently, thus saving them energy, then you should be compensated by gaining a portion of that energy. So yes, in this case, if someone invents a computer, or a computer program that is more efficient and is a genuine improvement then people would buy it and you would in turn make money off of the intellectual property. I have no problem with royalties.
Onto Nuclear Energy, we only have so much fissiable material in the earth, once we dig all of that up what do we do? Go to Luna and take all the Helium-3 and use that in He3-Li Fusion reactors? What happens when we use up all of that?
In any event, I don't have a real problem with the ideas behind our economic systems. If you lend someone money, you are providing a service, a needed service. And you should make money off of that. But when you suddenly begin to make so much 'money' that you're starting to create a inequitable divide that causes strafe you begin to become a threat to society at large. Lets jump around to limited energy supply since this ties into that subject.
When I said that we're in a limited energy system, I meant that once we discover all the energy resources, those resources are not renewable and do not come back. Furthermore with the law of thermodynamics energy is always degrading slowly and spreading throught the universe. So when somebody hoards a large ammount of wealth, they have effectivly taken that wealth out of the system and retained it for themselves. Since there is only so much energy left in the system, if we can not discover additional energy resources then those resources are basically stuck with those people, they consume less resources than they produce from interest and loans, and thus take wealth repeatedly from the system.
Here's the problem with this in story format. Lets say you were a corporate CEO in 1980. Well every year since then you've been getting a average raise of 192%, whereas inflation has increased at a rate of only 4%. now scale this up 24 years. The operator of the NYSE a nonprofit group, is being sued because he was going to be paid a wage of 188 Million Dollars, that's once a year. You can obviously see where I'm going with this. How can I possibly compete when all the energy resources of the system are presently being used by others? I'm trying to leach off of other people to gain energy for myself, but they will never feed me more energy than I produce.
Ehhh... I'm starting to lose it now, but you can see where I'm going with this. We do not have the same ability to succeed that our forebearers did because the energy is being ever tightened by the rich and the population that requires it to survive continue to expand at a feverish pace.
Yet I don't advocate Socialism, funny that. I advocate something differant. In socialism there is no drive to work hard, because you will not benefit from it. In Capitalism you have to work hard, or you will die, because without continuously expanding your energy resources you will collapse in upon yourself and die starving in the street. The obvious answer would be to find the best of both worlds.
Unfortuantly, I will never be able to do that, because I can't afford to go to even a local community college. Thus I can not invest the energy into something that would enable me to become more profitable. Hence my dreamy desire for Peak Oil. It is the surefire death of capitalism and complete transformation of the world economy. It will rectify the rich-poor divide and actually give me a chance to gain access to those once hoarded energy resources.
|