|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:19 AM Original message |
Bill Clinton for Vice President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taxidriver (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. i didnt think that was allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep - you have to be qualified to be prez in order to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
non sociopath skin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I guess that would be right .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. not a constitutional problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #9 |
36. Whoo-hoo! Good news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. I think he can be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That's what I thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. No, what I quoted is XXII - I checked again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:34 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. My mistake. But Astronomer is right, as you noted. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. the last sentence of the 12th amendment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Ah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. he can still be eligible, but not be able to be elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Hmmm... good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. He is NOT eligible to be VP, which was the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. No the 12th amendment stipulates that a person must be constitutionally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I guess that makes sense, but the issue is moot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. The 12th Ammendment bars him from being VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsman Matt Drudge (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, he was good for business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Matt! Matt! Follow-up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsman Matt Drudge (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. I wang Clinton, and have totally wang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Matt! Matt! Follow-up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsman Matt Drudge (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. That is completely false. Completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Is that really Matt Drudge? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
35. shouldn't newsman be in quotes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MallRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
15. Term limit is 2 terms or 10 years. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MallRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Oops, the 12th Amendment covered this contingency... sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Not really. Every Amendment after the first 10 were added |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtb33 (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. WMass astronomer got it above... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MallRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:41 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. 40 lashes with a wet noodle for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeinesRed (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
18. Sec'y of State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:57 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. did they "skip" maddy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I thought it was established that they would have been skipped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeinesRed (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. yes, she wasn't a part of the succession |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fryguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. but would he do it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarmerOak (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-18-04 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
31. A Roundup Of The Thread So Far! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC