Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr. Justice Douglas and the C&O Canal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 07:42 PM
Original message
Mr. Justice Douglas and the C&O Canal
On January 3, 1954 the Washington Post published an editorial in favor of a highway to be built along the old Chesapeake and Ohio Canal--185 miles of wilderness to be uprooted to make way for the automobile. Justice William O. Douglas, an ardent conservationist saw the editorial and wrote in reply to the paper:

"It is a refuge, a place of retreat, a long strech of uiet and peace at teh capitol's back door--a wilderness area where man can be alone with his thoughts, a sanctuary where he can commune with God and with nature, a place not yet marred by the roar of wheels and the sound of horns. It is a place for boys and girls, men and women. One can hike 15 or 20 miles on a Sunday afternon, or sleep on high dry ground in the quiet of a forest, or just go and sit with no sound except water lapping at one's feet. It is a sancturay for everyone who loves woods--a sanctuary that would be utterly destroyed by a fine two-lane highway."

To further make his point he invited the editor who wrote the editorial and anyone else to join him on making a hike of the 185-mile proposed highway and said that if they did they would come out of the experience with a new opinion. They did make that hike and the paper did change its opinion.

William O. Douglas not only one ofthe great Justices of all time but one of the great conservationists. Just wanted to share this with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Justice Douglas
was a very complicated man. I wouldn't put him up as one of the greatest justices, simply because he was a lazy and incompetent jurist. But he was a great liberal, a great political force, and, yes, also a great conservationist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC