Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Read it and weep - Pentagon's Futures Market Plan Condemned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:31 PM
Original message
Read it and weep - Pentagon's Futures Market Plan Condemned
Edited on Mon Jul-28-03 10:33 PM by Q
Pentagon's Futures Market Plan Condemned

Mon Jul 28, 7:46 PM ET

Add Politics - AP to My Yahoo!

By KEN GUGGENHEIM, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon ( news -web sites ) is setting up a stock-market style system in which investors would bet on terror attacks, assassinations and other events in the Middle East. Defense officials hope to gain intelligence and useful predictions while investors who guessed right would win profits.

Two Democratic senators demanded Monday the project be stopped before investors begin registering this week. "The idea of a federal betting parlor on atrocities and terrorism is ridiculous and it's grotesque," Sen. Ron Wyden ( news ,bio ,voting record ), D-Ore., said.

The Pentagon office overseeing the program, called the Policy Analysis Market, said it was part of a research effort "to investigate the broadest possible set of new ways to prevent terrorist attacks." It said there would be a re-evaluation before more money was committed.

The market would work this way. Investors would buy and sell futures contracts — essentially a series of predictions about what they believe might happen in the Mideast. Holder of a futures contract that came true would collect the proceeds of investors who put money into the market but predicted wrong.

A graphic on the market's Web page showed hypothetical futures contracts in which investors could trade on the likelihood that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat ( news -web sites ) would be assassinated or Jordanian King Abdullah II would be overthrown. - http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=536&e=5&u=/ap/20030728/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/terror_market
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. This can't possibly be true? Can it?
Well gees, uhhh, I'm just a little mind person but, uhhh, wouldn't it be bad to have people running around who would DIRECTLY BENEFIT from a terrorist attack?

Wait, we already have those people. Nevermind.

SICK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is really stupid
sh*t. Who the hell is running Washington. :wtf: We have Wall Street and Vegas for this kind of crap. Sometimes I wonder if the people 'in charge' are suffering LSD flashbacks or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antineocon1 Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another way to look at this is...
that this is a way to scare people to do what the US wants. Say, for example, that you place a bid that the King of Jordan will die in six months. This will persuade him to do what you want. If not, then it is likely that he will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It would also be an awesome way for those in this administration
to make money -- investing in futures on things they already KNOW are going to happen.

And speaking of money, doesn't the Pentagon stand to become a profit center with a scheme like this? Isn't that in itself a little grotesque?

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antineocon1 Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, it sure would be...
This sounds illegal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is a duplicate thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC