Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi: Not Keen to Go Under Oath in 9-11 Hearings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:20 PM
Original message
Condi: Not Keen to Go Under Oath in 9-11 Hearings
Condi and the 9/11 Commission

National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice is apparently not keen on going under oath for the Kean 9/11 commission.

By TIMOTHY J. BURGER WASHINGTON

Saturday, Dec. 20, 2003

Poised to convene its first hard-hitting hearings in January, the federal commission investigating the 9/11 attacks continues to be at odds with the White House over access to key information and witnesses. Two government sources tell TIME that National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice is arguing over ground rules for her appearance in part because she does not want to testify under oath or, according to one source, in public.

More at:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,565974,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bamademo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why, Condi, Why?
We know why. You had more specific warnings then you let on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can tell you why
She doesn't know how to lie worth a damn. It's so easy to tell when she's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very smart of her
If I were her, I wouldn't want to have to try to explain her comment that 'No one ever thought that airplanes could be used as weapons pre-9/11' (paraphrase) under oath.

She would either have to admit to being completely ignorant or a complete liar.

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. can't blame her
i think she might actually be a worse liar than *.

she's probably terrified. buh bye condi.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. And very arrogant of her....
I guess that is where Bush wants to draw the line? The people do not have a right to know. Period. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. What?
A * appointee stonewalling the 9/11 commission. I can't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cuz she's a LLLLLLIIIIIIAAAARRRRRRR!!!!!
Liar! Liar! Liar! Liar! Liar! Liar! Liar! Liar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Why did I think of Henry Rollins when I read your post?
Ha! She is the worst of the worst of the liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. She's a TERRIBLE liar, and she knows it
It's almost sad to watch her lie for these people. She physically shakes so bad that it almost looks like she's having a seizure. It must be miserable for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. she is a bad liar
whatever her faults, she is clearly not comfortable lying the way most republicans are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I love how the media
is always careful not to bite the hand that feeds them. Thus, after all is said and done, the authors always remind us that officials are always co-operating, despite the fact that the article is about officials creating ground-rules for testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gringo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. You can't call her that
Call her "Condoleeza" or "Rice" No nicknames allowed, right? Oh, only candidates? Sorry, getting so hard to keep up with the draconian rules around here anymore. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. "So, Dr. Rice, is it true that you had no idea that
airplanes could be used as weapons? Remember, you are under oath..."

Rice: "err, ummm, is this thing on?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. so, dr. rice.... you say you expected 'conventional' hijackings?

was that one plane at a time?
or multiple planes?

if you expected 'conventional' hijackings, why wasn't the 'conventional' protocol--for planes off-course--followed

and, when did you notice the stock irregularities?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. under oath?
I thought that no one was under oath who testified before the commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fifth Amendment, anyone?
Apparently it doesn't hurt Republicans' careers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. she could just say
'I don't remember'... worked for Raygun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rice is the weakest link! Get her under oath ASAP!
She almost cracked on TV once before. She needs to face jailtime and she'll sing like a canary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. "what did you know and when did you know it" scares her witless
as it should, considering there is a paper trail a mile long and even things supposedly secure behind "executive privledge" once leaked can and will be used for contempt of congress and perjury charges later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. So how do you think Condi will choose to go down?
A) Admitting to incompetence
B) Admitting to treason
C) Selling out the rest of the rats

Come on, everyone! It's fun to play and everybody wins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. D) Accidental death
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think Condi will be avoiding small one-engine planes for a while
Then again, "killed defending America against terrorists" might play well for the Bush administration, and I'm fairly certain Rumsfeld could arrange it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:26 PM
Original message
with her lack of foresight?
Who could ever imagine that small planes would be used to kill influential politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. LOL
Man, that's great. I really needed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. That's the bitterest laugh I've had all day
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. zing zing ZING
beautiful, frylock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Remember in a speech earlier this year
Al Gore vollunteered to go before the commission
he said he welcomed it .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Rapid Shifting of eyes...left, right, left, right..Liar,liar,liar
I can't see her doing either b.or c..might trigger an "unfortunate fall." However, there is amazing "forgivness" in the Repub party as well as the media, so my bet is on choice a.
I really don't see her being allowed to testify on behalf of the TRUTH. Bush's people are probably concting a NEW Constitutional Amendment to avert any damaging exposure to their sorry lying evil hearts. My guess is there will suddenly be a crisis on American soil to deem the White House "untouchable in a time of war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. In this case, a subpoena to CondoPizza Rice is in order. . .
subpoena means "under penalty" Her ass could be in the slammer otherwise.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Of course she's not...she's a criminal
Conflict-of-interest, bribery, collusion, perhaps treason...

She fears being under oath for the same reason the Emperor* does...or Tony Soprano, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Condi has no business being in the Bush Crime Family!
Not nearly cold-blooded enough! Plus she's a relative weakling - (as is Chimpy) meaning she's apparently haunted by a conscience! (The Evil/fool War Chimp has managed to dull his with drink and drugs - and religion!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hey, what about US v Nixon?
Didn't that rule that the president can't hide information from Congress or a criminal investigation if requested?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. Would she maintain the same excuse under penalty of perjury?
Big League stakes here. If she tries to maintain "nobody knew" and they have information to the contrary, she is toast. She is the firewall into the Oval Office.

I hope they ask her about that executive order to invade Afghanistan that was awaitng Bush's return from FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. She has liar lips...
you know those kind of lips that scrunch up and flatten out a little when someone is lying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC