Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't miss Bush press conference clip re: 9/11 advance warning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:48 AM
Original message
Don't miss Bush press conference clip re: 9/11 advance warning
From the press conference of Monday, Dec 15, 2003:

Q: "Howard Dean recently seemed to muse aloud whether you had advance knowledge of 9/11...."

A: "yeah" - shifty eyes, looking down and away - "uh...uh there's time for politics" - backing away, with a deer in the headlights look - "and I, y'know" - head shake, long pause - "jus' a time for politics, and ah" - another long pause - "I uh" - and another pause - "it's...it's an absurd insinuation."

Click right and save.

Is this the response of a blameless man? Looks to me like a man who, for an instant, can feel the walls close in.

http://images.indymedia.org/imc/washingtondc/media/video/6/9_11laugh.mpg

I played this for my wife, who's not a LIHOPer, and she said "Omigod, he is so lying."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dajabr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, my, God...
I've seen four year olds caught raiding the cookie jar do better under questioning.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Evident Panic
Did you steal that candy bar young man? I uh, uh, I, uh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. he would be saying uh, uh, uh
if the question was what is his mother's name, his idiocy makes this meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. He didn't do that very well, did he?
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 01:00 AM by dkf
Hmm, maybe Dean is on to something here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too bad the reporter didn't actually ASK the question!
All he asked was "Is this political hate speech?"

Maybe George heard it as "Is it true you had advance knowledge?"

(Hard to believe George has ANY knowledge, let alone advance...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is very hard to credit
How can anyone watch this man in operation and not break into a cold sweat? This is why hundreds of our soldiers, and thousands of Iraqi's had to die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. because the media won't call him on his BS....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Still reminds me of Condi and her twitches with eyes that can't focus ..
while she's TRYING hard to hedge errrr lie about the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's a subsurd assinuation...
Bush is speaking in tongues now - could the Four Horsemen be far off?:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Give credit where credit is due
Clark was challenging how Bush handled it FIRST. Dean just got the attention most liekly because of who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. give it a rest...
This isn't another Dean said/Clark said thread. This is Bush said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
64. Thanks
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. OFGS can we leave candidate bashing out of at least ONE thread??
Tell it to the guy who asked the question at the news conference, not to us, doofus.

The point is Bush, not anybody else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow
He sounds like the reporter just accused him of murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogfromthenorth2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
33. Sorry, I don't see it as you all do....
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 09:24 AM by frogfromthenorth2
Fact : Bush is a Dummy

And the fact that he is not able to answer is due to the fact that he doesn't understand the question and that he knows that he has nothing clever to say about the subject.

On Edit:

He is the rest of the question:

"Do you agree or disagree with the RNC that this kind of rhetoric borders on political hate speech? "

He is confused because he doesn't know what Rethoric means and what is a political speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. To summarize
What I hear you saying is that, "Bush isn't evil -- he's just stupid."

Well, I'll grant you the stupid part, but to me his reaction seems a few yards beyond merely stupid. The Moonie reporter gave him a path to a safe answer on a silver platter, but Bush was so obviously distressed about the question that he ignored the obvious softball answer and ended up in the ditch.

I think this is the most telling clip of Bush regarding 9/11 I've seen yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogfromthenorth2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Not exactly...
What I am saying is that if you think that this clip is the smoking gun that proves he knew something before 9/11 I will tell it's nothing more than wishfull thinking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Have you ever tended a bar?
Driven a cab? Been a security guard? Worked with the general public in a large degree?

I have, and his reaction speaks volumes to me. I have seen that behavior before SO many times.

Of course this clip doesn't 'prove' anything in the legal sense. But to me, it proves that we need a real investigation to see if there is anything there. His reaction tells me there is -- think of it as 'probable cause'. I guarantee that if any of us gave an answer like that to a cop during a traffic stop, we'd find our car searched in a jiffy (and probably a sobriety test, to boot).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. demeanor evidence is used to prove things all the time
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 02:49 PM by seventhson
If it is "probative" meaning it tends to prove something -- then it is admissible evidence of guilt.

Bush's response tends to prove he is guilty IMHO. Is it proof beyond a reasonable doubt? When combined with other evidence it might very well be.

But that is for the appropriate judges to determine (i.e. the Hague)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
60. Go read Mark Crispin Miller's book
The Bush Dyslexicon. Miller shows how Bush can be perfectly coherent when he's talking about his favorite topics, like the death penalty & "smokin' em out," but falls apart verbally when he gets into unfamiliar/uncomfortable territory like "putting food on your family."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogfromthenorth2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Very Interesting!
Will have to check that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #60
70. excellent catch
Miller's book is so trenchant, and widely misinterpreted.
I asked David Frum (on a radio show) why we should believe crap like his book (didn't use that word), which portrays him as a brave, decisive leader, despite Frum's admission that bush is incurious, parochial, distant, short-tempered, etc. I also said that I believed the only decision he was making in the WH were what color socks he'd wear on any given day.

then, I said if readers wanted some real insight into dumbo's REAL character, they should read Miller's book. they cut me off at that point, at which Frum completely mischaracterized the BD, saying it made fun of his alleged stupidity. that is exactly the OPPOSITE of Miller's thrust. he says that Bush is anything but stupid.....intellectually lazy, uninformed, incurious, yes. but NOT stupid, and that he's quite good at getting his point across when, as you said, it's a topic to which he can warm up.

this was most obvious in that press conference, as well as the Sawyer interview, when he blabbed on and on about God, but went ballistic, flapped his wings about, made all kinda funny faces, when she asked him about the obvious conflict in WMD stories put out in the war runup, and what's happened since.

speaking of which, a co-worker today talked about her daughter's response to the last bit, saying that she was amazed at what a "jerk" he was, when trying to answer Sawyer, and how obvious it was to her (a high school freshman) that he was concealing something

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. one of the most bizarre reactions I've ever seen
Is he waiting for the response from his cronies who are speaking to him through his cochlear implant?

Or is he just going insane?

Why isn't anyone in the media pointing this out (besides here?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
76. LOL LOL... ' ...going insane...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just played it for my husband
"that SOB" is what came out of his mouth .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink_poodle Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Squirming. He looks like he's going to puke! Geez. -nm
;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That Question kinda rocked his comfy little world didn't it ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink_poodle Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
43. The other thing I thought was: he thinks of himself as this..............
god or demi-god and to question him is to rock his belief in himself - he looked like the guy punched the wind out of him - like he was flabbergasted that anyone should even think these things about him........so now if you see it from that perspective, it still makes him look guilty but "above it all and beyond question" which is even scarier........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #43
77. Two words...
Narcissist and sociopath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. this clip is too short
Well into the next question he had looks of dread and guilt on his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, it's not exactly Captain Queeg's...
... strawberries speech in "The Caine Mutiny," but, it's getting there.... Note that he didn't even answer the question as asked--he didn't say, "No, I don't consider it hate speech, but it is political speech. It's bound to happen during an election year." Rather, he stumbled and mumbled, and then said it was an absurd insinuation.

I know a number of lawyers who'd have a field day with Dubya on the witness stand in front of a jury (something I think he's managed to avoid completely in his happy life).

Thanks for this catch--it's gonna get archived for future reference.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. What a transcript won't tell you.
The picture really is worth 1,000 words!

Really a decisive leader isn't he? I...uh...I...

Gosh, it wasn't even a tough question! Well, not for an innocent man anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. I am so relieved this issue is on the table
Dubya, oh, Dubya, you knew.

you knew.

you knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. On the table for us, yes...
But, will anybody outside DU and a few other places even notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. So what do we do now to force this to the top of the news queue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeanIsAPitbull Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
21. LMAO Dean owns Bush even through reporters!
Bush is going to get his ass kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I want to see this brought up during the debates...
and I want to see it driven home...any candidate who starts nailing Bush on specific points on his behavior on 9/11 will get my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
71. media will say that's unfair, making political hay out of national tragedy
will spin it so it seems *, once again playing the 'lowered expectation' game, deSPITE being the incumbent, is being attacked, denigrated, subject to out-of-bounds aggression.

just watch. they'll do ANYthing to rescue this twit.

too angry.....too negative.....that sort of thing

meanwhile the boiler room will be re-activated, and countless lies will be repeated, heedless of any sort of truthfulness, then amplified, spread to the winds, and repeated endlessly until the desired negative storyline is achieved and unwaveringly followed throughout the course of the selection process.

lots and lots of reporters adMITTED this storyline deal happened duringd the last campaign.


you could look it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. Interesting...
...we know he's not all that intelligent, but an innocent man might have come up with a better response. That reeked, badly. Notice he couldn't even look at the press corp when he muttered "absurd insinuation", he looked down and away. He's a friggin liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. Paging Michael Moore + any honest journalists out there
Moore, save this clip for your 9/11 movie.

Journalists, get a tape of this and play it back for yourself four or five times. Then take a deep breath, and do your job:

Tell the truth without favor or malice. Just tell it.

"The hour it is getting late." - Bob Dylan


TWO RIDERS WERE APPROACHING, AND THE WIND BEGAN TO HOWL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. Yes, very obvious!
I was watching a reply of this press conference on CSPAN last night and caught this moment.

He was thinking about that question during the next question and he squinted his eyes. It was chilling to see the expression on his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hell,on the follow up question.....
Why didn't the reporter ask one simple question:

Isn't it true that John Ashcroft stopped flying on commercial airliners in the weeks or months before 9/11??

They sure as SHIT would have asked Clinton such a question.

David

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. Ashcroft Flying High
For our dittohead visitors.

www.msnbc.com/news/907379.asp?0cv=KA01
The Secrets of September 11
The White House is battling to keep a report on the terror attacks secret. Does the 2004 election have anything to do with it?

April 30 — Even as White House political aides plot a 2004 campaign plan designed to capitalize on the emotions and issues raised by the September 11 terror attacks, administration officials are waging a behind-the-scenes battle to restrict public disclosure of key events relating to the attacks.

<snip>Some sources who have read the still-secret congressional report say some sections would not play quite so neatly into White House plans. One portion deals extensively with the stream of U.S. intelligence-agency reports in the summer of 2001 suggesting that Al Qaeda was planning an upcoming attack against the United States—and implicitly raises questions about how Bush and his top aides responded. One such CIA briefing, in July 2001, was particularly chilling and prophetic. It predicted that Osama bin Laden was about to launch a terrorist strike “in the coming weeks,” the congressional investigators found. The intelligence briefing went on to say: “The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning.”

The substance of that intelligence report was first disclosed at a public hearing last September by staff director Hill. But at the last minute, Hill was blocked from saying precisely who within the Bush White House got the briefing when CIA director Tenet classified the names of the recipients. (One source says the recipients of the briefing included Bush himself.) As a result, Hill was only able to say the briefing was given to “senior government officials.”


www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A15957-2001
Summer Spinning
To GOP, Vacation Boosted Bush Agenda; To Democrats, Voters See a Shirk Ethic
Aug 29, <2001>

<snip>The White House had announced that Bush would stay at his 1,600-acre ranch in Crawford from Aug. 4 through Labor Day on Sept. 3, a 31-day stretch that would have broken a modern record for a presidential vacation, held by Richard M. Nixon for a 30-day trip to San Clemente, Calif., in 1969. News reports played up the record, and a Gallup Poll found that 55 percent of respondents thought Bush's vacation was too long.

The length of the trip revived old questions about Bush's work ethic, and the poll and the news coverage caused consternation in the White House. Aides said they had planned an ambitious schedule for Bush as long ago as late June, but reporters were not told about it, even after they landed here. The White House, suddenly defensive, took every opportunity to show Bush on the go and even created a "Western White House" logo for the briefing room at Crawford Elementary School. Bush revealed that his ranch had new video conferencing equipment for keeping in touch with his national security team.

www.jacksonholenews.com/Archives/NewsArchive/2001/010815-News.html
News story - Aug. 15, 2001
A Working Vacation
Vice President Cheney plans to fish, travel during month-long valley sojourn.
By Angus M. Thuermer Jr.

Vice President Dick Cheney took time off from his month-long working vacation Monday to outline his plans for August in Jackson Hole and to reflect on "an amazing year."

Cheney, who will live at his Teton Pines home about six miles west of Jackson until Labor Day, defended his energy policy, supported a local decision to limit drilling around the Gros Ventre Wilderness, recalled a life of service in Washington and said his health problems are not affecting his ability to fish for trout on his favorite Western waters.

www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml
Ashcroft Flying High
WASHINGTON, July 26, 2001

(CBS) Fishing rod in hand, Attorney General John Ashcroft left on a weekend trip to Missouri Thursday afternoon aboard a chartered government jet, reports CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart.

In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term.

"There was a threat assessment and there are guidelines. He is acting under the guidelines," an FBI spokesman said. Neither the FBI nor the Justice Department, however, would identify what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. Why would a 'neutral' reporter call it 'hate speech'?
- This was a setup...more to discredit a Democratic candidate than get Bush* to answer a probing question.

- The RWing owns the media...don't expect them to search for the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. A slow pitch from the Moonie Times,
but the reporter didn't get the memo: Don't mention prior knowledge!

And as has been said, the reporter didn't ask Bush what he knew; he asked Isn't Dean a hatemonger for suggesting such a thing? But even that was too much for Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. What is interesting is that Chimp didn't even understand
that he had been given a golden opportunity to bash Dean but because he is too stupid to hold two thoughts in his mind at the same time (guilt and politics) Bush blew it.

If there were a real invesitgation he would fall like a house of cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. That is the most guilty-sounding answer I have ever seen
Ever.

From anyone -- even my kids.

I saved the clip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
37. The minute he shifted his eyes away I wanted to throw up.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
39. Let's keep this one kicked for all the "visitors"
If FAUX News, the WSJ, and the Dildo-heads are gonna read the board, let's give em something to look at.

Hey Repukes.... WHY DOES YOUR CHIMP IN CHIEF LOOK SO GUILTY HERE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrickS Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
40. Bush Knew
Nothing else to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. He looks like a man trapped in a corner
Uh, oh! Uncle Dick didn't tell me what to say! What do I do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
42. Correction
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 10:24 AM by HFishbine
I think what he actually said was, "s'ansurdsinuation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
44. and that GD reporter
"Guess I'll follow up on something unrelated"...to a chorus of laughter!
We can't have * having a complete nervous break down on camara can we. Never mind the people who have died because of this POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
45. The importance of this is in regards to the 9/11 investigation..
that Bush is withholding documents from...

But Bush is not the only one that knows. There are others that know if the information was there to perhaps prevent the attack but they are covering their butts also. One might think Cheney and Rice would know.

My first impression when watching him try to respond was the thought, "I don't want to lie...so I will dismiss it as politics as usual". But it was a simple question. But he looked like the criminal in the chair of a Perry Mason episode when it has been discovered that he was the guilty party. Oh my God! They have discovered me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
46. Not That It Matters... BUT...
It's always interesting to see how the Freepers try to explain-away or how they justify his behavior and how they try to gloss-over and minimalize events and words and actions that are VERY REVEALING.

How is Dubya's "act" playing over there? What do they have to say about it?

Are they ignoring the big white elephant in the room? Or did they admit to noticing it, yet they continue to make lame excuses for him?

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yes - It's Playing out in Freeperworld just
as their masters have written the script for them. "It is ridiculous, the Dems are just bashing him because they hate him, everyone KNOWS he would not DARE scare the children - he couldn't do anything - and the old favorite - it was Clinton's fault.

And since when is asking who knew what when is characterized as hate speech? Ah yes, it is in the new Amerika.


Q. Mr. Pres., I know we're not supposed to ask political questions but Howard Dean suggested you may have had foreknowledge of September 11th. Do you agree with RNC head (Whatisname) that this qualifies as political hate speech?*

Bush (visibly panicked). Political... political... uh... insinuation. (End of response. Less than 10 seconds.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
48. Remember Clark
When he got pissed off at the faux reporter over the "sideshow" issue. He damn near lost his temper and I don't blame him.

If I were accused as bush was I would be *PISSED OFF* no umm ughh arrr crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. Deserves a kick
Thanks for posting. Full press conf should be on cspan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
52. Whoa, that was weird n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
53. We could tell he was lying from the audio file
6,000 miles away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenm Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
54. Bush Knew
Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew Bush Knew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
55. Bush gave that reporter the most evil glare ...
....during the unrelated (big press corpse laugh) follow-up question. After a second or two, his expression smoothly morphed to its normal smirking countenance. But for a long moment, Bush wore a face out of the dock at Nurenberg in 1946.



Did Bushler experience a deja-vu?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. you mean this photo??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. ewwww I hadn't seen that picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Nice glare that!
Thanks, slinkerwink! Photographic evidence of sociopathy.

I'm not positive if that's the moment, as the camera angle I remember was from the side, but that could very well be. The guy in the foreground must be "Stretch" or "Shiny Stretch" or WTFing nickname the unelected moron gives his captive press.

Note what happens if you cover up Bushler's face, one half at a time. The left side (Smirk's right) shows utter contempt. The right side (Smirk's left) shows abject fear. Both show a very small mind.

Thanks a lot for the windows on this soulless bed-wetter. The Little Turd from Crawford proves anyone can become President, provided their father was head of the nation's secret police and stood at the ready as vice president for a man suffering from Alzheimer's for most of two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. Kick
Edited on Wed Dec-17-03 07:50 PM by Junkdrawer
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. and THIS with the CBS news report about 9/11.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
58. Pathetic. The reporter was bashing Dean for "hate speech", but
was so stupid that he ended up putting Bush on the spot instead. Sadly, the only time you get meaningful exchanges from the White House Press Corps is when they beat themselves at their own game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
61. imagine Bush testifying before the Commission
he doesn't get to pick the questions, and the questioners won't let him give his usual non-answers. He'll have to give real answers for the first time ever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Oh God
please let me live so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. "I refuse to answer on the grounds it may incriminate me."
Or he could restate:

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th.  Malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."

— George W. Bush

No matter. Either way, the Little Turd from Crawford is a traitor.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/tyranny/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #69
78. you know, Octafish, that was the very first time
I thought something was fishy. (Octafishy?) I had been too stunned to process the events clearly, but when I heard him say "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories..." Huh - why did he just say that? What an odd thing to tell the world community, Mr Bush. That's the sound of someone protesting too much.

Shortly after, my oldest friend, a Toronto lawyer, told me in confidence how he had tried over the summer of 2001 to get US and Canadian officials to take seriously the warnings of his client, Mike Vreeland, and his "Let one happen, stop the rest" sealed letter.

Since then, nothing has seemed more outrageous than the official story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #61
72. Only if they take away his earpiece, through which his handlers feed him
the answers to questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
67. Saw a clip on the news
of Diane Sawyer asking bush a difficult question and if looks could kill, she would have been dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. Is there a link
for the Diane Sawyer interview? I only saw parts..I'd like to know what was said after the taping..I bet he told Diane Sawyer off because he definitely was pissed..Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. Here's a link...
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 01:35 AM by alg0912
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/video_index/video_index.html

It's down on the right side under "Live Events"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnabelLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
68. I never watch that POS
But I made an exception for this. I saw naked fear in his eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
75. Keeping this one on the Front Page for our lurking freeper friends.
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 08:39 AM by JohnyCanuck
I am usually very leery of posts that try to read into someone's visible reactions in a video clip that they are lying or attempting to cover up some deep dark secret, but by golly this one is different. Damning is not too strong a word for that guilty look that crosses the lying weasel's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
79. Kick
Keep hope alive, as well as this post. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC