|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:20 PM Original message |
Is Dean Naive For Saying We Are Not Safer After Saddam's Capture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. No, not naive at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
77. For Crying Out Loud...Did He LOOK Like A Threat To You? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:31 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Dean is right... Iraq is a little safer for Iraqis and Kurds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
83. I will give it to him -- as straight answer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. No he's right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. He should have said we are no safer from terrorism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleDannySlowhorse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrAnarch (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well, did they find him in California... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. he's stating the obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. Once again, Dean is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
62. Yup, heard it on NPR tonight, same old Iraq situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. He's absolutely right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drfemoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
50. I only wish they were 'safer' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. Dean is correct, we aren't safer with Uncle Saddy in custody. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. No, Dean's right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POed_Ex_Repub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. Some people may question that stance now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KFC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
13. Obviously we are safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. How are we safer considering saddam wasn't a threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. According to the "media" many in Iraq feared his return to power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Last time I checked American soliders were also citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Just how are we safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Claybrook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Would you explain how we're safer by one iota? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. I disagree..it is a wash at best.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. Of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NicoleM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. Dean is 100% wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuminousX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't think we are safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
81. Agreed. Americans are less safe not more because of Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
18. The only Naive people are those who think we are safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. No Doc Funk, I think hes right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
22. We are NOT safe as Long as BUSH&Co is in the Executive Offices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuminousX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. It's a great set-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhosNext (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
25. Dean looks HAMMERED in that picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. You add so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhosNext (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Seriously, doesn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. There's the potential to be safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuminousX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Then you should applaud it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Reality doesn't matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuminousX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
73. No, what you are hearing is what you want to hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
49. Correct answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. Are Americans naive for believing the capture of Saddam makes us safer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebgrkng (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. We ARE safer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. "Iraq is as much a battle for hearts and minds" -- says it all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
78. Are you Iraqi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
82. you mean our access to Iraqi oil is safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. I would tend to agree with Dean here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Actually, There Is Significant Evidence That He WAS Coordinating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Claybrook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. And you know that because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. The capture of Saddam might even escalate the attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
34. Do you feel safer? I don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaumont58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
35. If I remember right, you are a Kerry supporter and...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
36. Non-Deanie here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. We're no safer than we were on Sept 12, 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CMT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. in what way are we or our soldiers safer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
41. How the hell are we safer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eissa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
43. We at the DU don't agree on much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
47. Although I Clearly Was Referring To Stabilization, Deanies Ignore It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drfemoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. deals with the devil as security device |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrAnarch (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. haha....you are confusing context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:19 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Is That An Old Quote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrAnarch (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:27 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. time of the statement is not important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. So You Are Saying It Is Inexact And Poorly Put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrAnarch (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpibel (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:54 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. So you are saying you would like to change the grounds of the debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
48. Saddam is not connected to Al-Qaeda, therefore we are NOT safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Like This? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. Your topic was, are we "safer" since Saddam was captured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBHagman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
51. The capture of Saddam does NOTHING to make anyone safer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
52. My version of this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Even Dean Conceded That Saddam Posed A Threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karabekian (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
61. yes he is naive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
63. Are we safer? Nope Not a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:02 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. As long as * is a squatter at 1600 Pensylvania all bets are off for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VermontDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
65. No it has not made us safer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
68. I think you're nit-picking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
70. I agree with Dean 100 % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
72. You have to ask yourself.. safer from what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
74. Mr. Dean is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
75. I think your statement quoted below is quite naive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
76. The longer we are in Iraq and the Middle East, the less safe we are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
80. Anyone in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
84. Gotta disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
85. what would you say if half your campaign was kicked out from under ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
littlejoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-15-03 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
86. Naiive? Not in the least. Just plain smart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC