Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam Captured, Stick a Fork in Dean, He's Done............

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:29 AM
Original message
Saddam Captured, Stick a Fork in Dean, He's Done............
That's it folks, the final derailment of the Dean Campaign. It's all you going to hear from now till November. The Dictator is in custody the world is better for it, the loss of life is worth it.

If there are still attacks, which there will be, the public may sour on the war still, but (11 months, running out of time here).....and there's always the economy and

Osama Bin Laden, but.......The world is still a dangerous place, nobody can replace Bush without the experience to protect America.


"It's Time for Democrats to Think About That, And Think About It Now"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Darwin2002 Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. What if Saddam sings about h is connections to the bushes and rumsfeld?
guess we'll never know, uh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I heard he was very talkative this morning...
...of course it wasn't reported what he was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. That's right!
Don't forget Poppy and his boys trained 'ol Saddam and was in bed with him for years. Saddam knows where the bodies are buried. I pray that he gets a full opportunity to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. I wish, but ask Noriega
He can talk all he wants and no one will hear him. Hell the corporate media won't even cover half of the Democratic candidates who want to replace Bush, you think they'll give Saddam press to rat out Bush? Never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. huh?
ooooooooo-kayyyyyyyyyy

did you forget that bush sucks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow another bullshit post.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Your comment is just too stupid ....
...but I can't pass it up.

If you think people like Dean only because of his opposition to the Iraq war, you, my friend, are totally clueless.

We might as well stick a fork in Clark--isn't he the guy with the foreign policy experience? Isn't he the one saying we went about this all wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yep it hurts Clark too......
But it really hurts everybody...I'll admit it. But the main thing it hurts are those who would say, We Should Have Never Gone....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. didn't Clark say "we should never have gone"?????
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, that's funny. I thought we invaded Iraq because of WMDs...
My brain has not been properly washed, I guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. As I posted in Skinner's thread
I've been against Hussein since I protested outside the Iraqi embassy in the '80s, back when Rumsfeld et al. were pals with him. I was against the invasion of Iraq, but I was glad he was no longer in power as a result of the invasion.

I'm now happy that he has been captured and I hope some justice comes of it. I never doubted that we'd defeat Hussein and, frankly, I'm surprised he's remained free and alive this long.

However, I'm not sure I see how this hurts Dean and Clark. Removing Hussein from power was not the rationale for invading Iraq. We were told that Hussein had all these deadly weapons of mass destruction that were 45 minutes away from being launched at us, if you recall.

Dean and I believe Clark too have questioned this argument as the basis for invading Iraq. Bush Inc. never made a convincing case that gained the support of the world community so they just went ahead and did what they wanted to anyway and when WMDs were not found anywhere, suddenly Neo-Cons and Fox News were crowing about how invasion was to liberate the Iraqi people.

Dean and Clark (and Kucinich, too, although his rationale is much different than the other two) called Bush on the flimsy, disingenuous case he made for invasion, for alienating the world community and violating international law, for putting our troops in a quagmire, and for setting a dangerous precedent for "pre-emptive" wars.

It sometimes feels like I'm Winston Smith in 1984 who holds on to this scrap of knowledge that for everyone else has been sucked down the m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, Dean!
I think his ascendancy was precisely the reason why the war in Iraq had to be ended. The timing of his capture, so soon after talk of distributing contracts and exit strategy, is just too much.


rocknation


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomNickell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nonsense.
If capturing S.H. meant peace and a parliamentary democracy in Iraq, Bush would be re-elected.

It doesn't and he won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. they are just hoping that it will help their candidate.
only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sun comes out tomorrow, Dean's finished
the moon is in the night sky, Dean's done.

New day, a new cause to say it's over for Dean. Just like yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavebat2000 Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. It figures you'd say that
You ARE a clark supporter. But every democrat is going to be screwed temporarily by this. Deans campaign is the only one that even CAN beat this kind of spike in the ratings. The effect of this hurts the candidates across the board (with the exception of lieberman). So dont even try to say any single candidate is hurt more than anyone else, because thats simply not true. It sounds to me like wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, I forgot...
Dean has no platform except "Where's Saddam," right? Please. "The final derailment?" Have I missed previous "derailments?"

Dean's got a LOT to offer (as does Clark-I don't want to turn this into a "my candy date is better than your candy date...") and this Capture has little or nothing to do with him.


Jeez...can we hold off on the Dean bashing on this "democratic board" until we all get our coffee? The way some people see it, Dean must be worse than Idi Amin, Saddam, and Pauly Shore all rolled into one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yep, it's all over! Turn out the lights!
NOT!

Dean started his run on health issues. Even if the war was totally off-radar, he'd still have his early platform.

That and people said his campaign was over after Bush "won" Iraq. Funny thing that he's only done better since then, huh?

If you think Dean's going to suddenly lose supporters because of this, then you really don't understand the Dean campaign.

If I want to, I could spin this as being bad for every other canidate. The rest of the pack is going to get less time than ever in the media to make their case, and I make you a bet that Dean will get invited on a hell of a lot of programs to state his case--just like they've done before anytime anything went negative for Dean.

The middle of the pack candidates are the ones who just got hurt the worst.

(Spinning is fun! Get the whole familiy involved!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kclown Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hooray! Now he can unkill all our soldiers
and restore all the missing limbs!  Now everyone can come home
to a good job in a prosperous economy!  

Late last year Andy Borowitz's headline was "Bush accuses
Saddam of hiding 1 million American jobs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Just the opposite is true
Dean is very smart and will focus on the domestic issues that are of a much higher concern to Americans than whether or not Saddam is captured. It also minimizes the importance of defense in the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. My guess is that Dean will ultimately get a huge boost from this
Edited on Sun Dec-14-03 10:38 AM by Walt Starr
because my gut tells me the average number of U.S. American soldiers KIA in Iraq will raise to about three per day now.

I sincerely hope and pray to The Goddess I am wrong and Dean goes down in flames, but my gut tells me otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. your thesis is bullshit
the capture of saddam will be a TEMPORARY boost for the occupation. but the imposition of israeli occupation methods in iraq will guarantee escalating resistance. also taking saddam out may well embolden non-baathists to get more aggressive and to start settling old scores.

it is a victroy for the occupation authorities, but hardly decisive. we dont see any light at the end of the tunnel yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanola Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. As a Clark Supporter/voter?
Do you know that the General does not agree with other candidates being "carved up"? Perhaps you should follow your candiates actions as well. Clark has been a class act for not engaging in baseless attacks on the other candidates. Too bad some of his supporters cannot follow his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Locking- Dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC