*snip*
Do not allow the opposition to define your candidate. It is much easier to defeat a distorted caricature than the authentic honorable and capable candidate. And so, the GOP successfully portrayed Al Gore as humorless, stiff, “unlikeable,” self-promoting, and above all, dishonest. They said that he claimed to have invented the internet (he never made the claim) and that he claimed to have “discovered” Love Canal (false again). These and numerous additional false accusations were made time and again, with feeble denials at best, until they came to be accepted as “conventional wisdom.” In fact, the caricatured Gore (humorless, stiff, aloof, etc.) was a far cry from the witty, charming and personable individual known to his friends and associates.
And now it begins again. How often have we heard that the apparent Democratic front-runner, Howard Dean, is “another George McGovern” – i.e., an unelectable “wacko” fringe liberal. Worse still, Dean’s fellow Democrats – his pre-nomination rivals – are piling on with these labels and thus doing the GOP’s dirty work.
In point of fact, Howard Dean is arguably the most mainstream, even “conservative,” of the Democratic candidates, as his record of Vermont governor testifies. (See Rosenfeld and Holhut).
Wesley Clark has also been the subject of “redefinition,” as dishonest, wily and unscrupulously ambitious. Interestingly, among the Democratic contenders, Dean and Clark seem to be the targets of the most determined efforts of redefinition by the GOP. Presumably because these two are the most formidable potential opponents of Bush.
If ever there were a politician vulnerable to negative characterization, it is George Bush. So why aren’t the Democrats hard at work defining him? Hell, there isn’t even a need to concoct a list of disagreeable and disqualifying personal qualities (as the GOP did with Gore) – the authentic qualities of the man are more than enough.
*snip*
http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/democrats.htm