Just how bad are those 27 pages for Bush? Seems like a LIHOP to me.

[TruthIsAll]

Methinks very bad. If Bush is protecting the Saudi's, knowing that they were responsible for 9/11, doesn't that totally destroy his arguments that bin Laden, Saddam and al Qaeda were the bad guys?

This could be the equivalent of the incriminating Nixon tapes, in which he told his aides to mislead the FBI/CIA right after the Watergate break-in. Here, Bush told the FBI (O'Neill) to layoff the bin-Laden/Saudi link. And he also ignored the CIA warnings before 9/11.

Dots...connecting...finally?

Seems like a L...I...H...O...P to me..

[liberalnurse]

1. Is it reported and documented that

*bush told O"Neill to lay-off the bin-Laden/Saudi link? If so, then that is really serious. Of course we know that O'Neill went down in 911.....Did he leave any notes?

[JackSwift]

2. It's a whitewash

and the media, owned by the far right, is just going to suck it up.

[imax2268]

3. it just goes to show...

that this administration has more skeletons in their closets...

Why are those pages a secret...is there something in there that can hurt them...
Real Time with Bill Maher made mention to it...

This is something that people must be able to see...I don't buy the National Security bit...3000+ people died that day and they are keeping secrets...what are they hiding...?

[izzie]

4. Marking out those pages was like putting a flag on them.

Too smart guys.Who would not want to see them now.

[TomNickell]

5. PLEASE! Don't -say- LIHOP!

These blank pages will leak, or the speculation will grow worse than the real content.

UNLESS, the story gets associated with anti-gravity death rays and vast conspiracies that require the collusion of most of the Government. THEN, nobody touches the story and it dies again.

[union_maid]

6. Don't know if it's LIHOP or not...

and I wouldn't speculate, but it does remind me of a certain 18 minute gap on a tap a few decades back.