Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Rollins on CNBC: Gore and Dean talking as if they are targeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:33 AM
Original message
Ed Rollins on CNBC: Gore and Dean talking as if they are targeting
conservatives who don't like what's going on in Iraq. If that's there aim, Dean is going to lose bigtime.

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why did he say they would lose?
It's not like some don't have a myriad of other reasons for ditching
Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dean should take Gore's endorsement but not strategy *nm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ed Rollins is a Complete and Total Idiot.
Is he still breathing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Complete & total & corrupt idiot. Another pug who blocks black votes
He helped Whitman steal the NJ gov position by supressing the black vote about 10 years ago (see, it's nothing new). Then he oppenly bragged about it at a *press converence."

Whitman was incensed. How dare he disclose that! It should only be discussed with good ol' boys in a dark room at an *exclusive* club!

http://archives.cjr.org/year/94/1/cynicism.asp

"...At a November 9 Sperling breakfast, Rollins, boasting about how he had just helped win a governorship for New Jersey's Christine Todd Whitman, said the campaign had spent about $ 500,000 to suppress the black vote. He said GOP operatives had made payments to Democratic precinct workers in black areas on condition they sit on their hands on election day. And he said the Whitman campaign had contributed to church charities in return for black ministers keeping mum on the virtues of Democratic incumbent James Florio..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm sorry, but this is the reason I don't like New Jersey.
I realize it's a Democratic stronghold, but when New Jersyians pick Florida to retire, they bring with them their bad habits and it has made this state just a little more vicious than it was before they came.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ok...has nothing to do with the point of the post, but dislike away.
NJ's too crowded anyway. So spread the bad word to keep the overpopulation from even getting worse.

(New Jersians are undeniably rude though if that's what you're saying.
It's a stereotype, and a true one. But I love 'em anyway.
At least they're up front about it. In your face but not
stabbing you in the back...unless of course they're carjacking
you in Newark.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. It goes a lot deeper than just bad manners.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. With crossover appeal Dean can win in a landslide.
A lot of Repubs are on to Bush.... I think they will be the "Reagan Democrats" of 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. or new meaning to "Rockefeller Republicans"
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 01:55 AM by loyalsister
if Jay is on the ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. With Dean's reputation...............
as a fiscal conservative that just might appeal to many who voted for Bush the first time he lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Too bad dean has no cross over appeal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Many think of the Iraq war as an immoral war.
I don't think whether it could cause anyone to lose the election should even be considered in the same breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ed Rollins is truly clueless on this one...
...because the true conservatives (not the NeoCons) are losing kids in Iraq, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yes, but they are not anti-war, and see those who are as unamerican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. haha those supply siders hate all Dems
Hell I thought Liesman was gonna cry the day Pete Stark was on there kicking Pug ass. It was a golden moment.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's already been discussed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Guess Ed wasn't watching C-SPAN last night.
There are conservatives who don't like Iraq, or other things the Fraudministration has done, and they won't be voting for Junior. Whether they will vote for our nominee remains to be seen, but the fact that they WON'T vote for Bush is significant. And if another right wing candidate jumps into the race, Junior will lose even more votes.... Anybody got Pat Buchanan's phone number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AWD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. He's right....
...because NO politician EVER won by trying to attract voters from the opposite side.

I mean, the "Reagan Democrats" were actually a Double-A baseball team in southern Caleeforneea. Right?

They are TERRIFIED of Dean and Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. I agree - dems once again fundamentally underestimate what anti-war ...
will win them.

I am anti the iraq war of course, but quite honestly the best position a Dem candidate could have for winning election is "I supported the war at the time but slowly began to have serious doubts as to this administrations ability to handle it." Why? Becuase that's what the majority of Americans identify with. The majority of americans are not peaceniks - they supported the war whole-heartedly but now have their doubts about the administration's handling of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. you are wrong

support for the war was an inch deep at best
people know, if even on a visceral level, that the war support was manufactured and justifications phoney

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Dean should say he supported the Iraq War?
Why should he do that when he never did support it to begin with? We need to be pounding Bush and his thugs over Iraq not trying to worry about being politically correct. Hell,even an idiot like Newt Gingrich has figured out that the invasion was flawed from the begining and that Bush is in a spiral.

Dems like Gephardt and Kerry have come out and tried to cover their ass but it never has rang true with anyone. None of these gung-ho Joe sixpack guys have jumped on their bandwagon because they NOW say they made a mistake when they supported Bush and his trumped up death for PROFIT invasion.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why would that be their aim?
That seems so off I don't know where to begin. Rollins seriously thinks Gore stuck his neck out in such a big way to woo a tiny portion of the conservative population? I kind of doubt it, to put it extremely mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. The true conservatives are starting to get irritated
Remember that true conservatives (or Goldwater Conservatives) are big on efficient government. They hate reckless spending. And they tend to be isolationists, so this Iraq thing rubs them.

The invasion of civil liberties is also very non-conservative. True conservatives are becoming disenchanted.

Take Pat Buchanan. Ever think he'd be dissing Bush?

Or how about the callers on C-Span last night?

There is a small groundswell of conservative backlash against the Bush Administration. The Dems should take advantage of this.

I'm not saying become another 'Party of Goldwater', but stress things like responsible spending and correcting the mistakes in Iraq. The Dems are in favor of this already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC