Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems screw up in first minute of NH debate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:20 PM
Original message
Dems screw up in first minute of NH debate.
First "question".
Ted Koppel talks about Gore endorsement of Dean and asks all dem candidates to raise hand if they think Dean can beat Bush*.

Dean's is the only hand to go up.
Then Koppel starts with Kerry "Why don't you think Dean can beat Bush*?" and Kerry goes into a campaign speech.

EVERY HAND SHOULD HAVE GONE UP!
Read that again.
EVERY HAND UP!
WE ALL CAN BEAT BUSH*.
And the candidates SHOULD say "Any person up here can beat George Bush*. What we should be talking about is..."

Merde.
I am SO down.
We are going to kick our own tushies.
And it took a H-E-double hockey sticks of a lot of self control to avoid profanity in the first post in this thread.
Merde doesn't count.
You could look it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onebigbadwulf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it live or delayed?
I am CALI time I want to watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. c-span @ 6:00 CST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug Decker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The NH dabate on is live...
is SoCal right now, on Cspan1. Channel 65 on Time Warner Cable.

Enjoy :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. CSpan is simulcasting it
not sure about your time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. what a bunch of goofs...
I hope Dean pulls a Truman on them and boy oh boy will I laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Funny you should mention that,
because my mom said this morning while watching the speech that Dean reminded her of Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I could have jackslapped each and every one of the other 7!
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 07:23 PM by Padraig18
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Dean had his turn to talk about the Gore endorsement and he
said that if they had an issue with the endorsement, then attack me (Dean) not Al Gore who he called a moral and good man.

I was very disappointed with the beginning of this debate. But Dennis K put Koppel in is place by blaming him for starting this debate on the Gore endorsement. And the audience agreed and clapped loudly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Good for Kucinich!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. Aye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I liked that!
:toast: to DK! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
68. That's right, he did
and they did applause.

he stuck it back up Koppel just right. It's not how the media sees it.

go DK!

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Caution: Strong Language to Follow:
STUPID, DUMBASS, IGNORANT, IDIOT, EGO-DRIVEN, DUMBSHIT, NOT-A-FUCKING-CLUE ASSHOLES.

I am SO goddam tired of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. That was stupid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. Every hand should have gone up!
Everyone should have maintained that any one of them could beat Bush. This was a moment of unity that the grassroots needed to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. How sad
We really are our own worst enemy. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I held some hope out, until now.
I think we're fucked.
Talk about NOT having your act together.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Yeah, this is an ad made in heaven for *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pride vs. Unity
and pride won :(

BTW, stupid question Koppel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. The circular firing squad of Democratic legend
:puke::grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. IMHO, Good question. Bad answer.
That was a gimme for "us", and "we" blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. No
DEM establishment is not the same thing as "WE".

Sorry.

THEY blew it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. maybe but
he did expose a major weakness, and they could have raised their hands and shown some wisdom and class. He set a trap, they walked into it and looked foolish.
I fear a sound bite...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. We don't deserve to win
Bush isn't sweating it, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. It Was a Gotcha - Wasn't Can-we-ALL-beat-Shrub
If each candidate was going to say somebody else could do the job, why carry on a competing campaign.

KUCINICH is being smoother and funnier, saying he didn't expect to get GORE's endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. why is corporate whore Koppel allowed to ask BS questions like that?
Everyone should agree that anyone can beat Bush, but why do we allow nonsense, BS, divise questions like that? Hire someone else, Ted Kopell is hardly a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thank you.
If everyone else raised their hands then the media whores would have spun that as an endorsement of Dean by the other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. no questions about ISSUES yet
Horse race, polls, money, yadda yadda. Someone retire this sorry lapdog.

Kerry just said "If I was an impolite person I would tell you what to do with your polls." GOOD FOR KERRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Did he really say that???
That's great!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. Baloney --
You can't blame them for everything. This was a huge mess up. You don't just raise your hand, you make it clear that everyone of them can beat Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fuck every one of 'em who didn't stick up their hand
Every last one.

That was so stupid. The answer was clear, "Any of us can and will beat Bush, Ted. The real question is which one of us will be best for America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Me & you, Walt.
Fuck it.
I'm going to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Sorry but the question was a total setup
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 08:55 PM by SahaleArm
Damned if you do and damned if you don't. Would you prefer the media annoint the nominee now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. The answer doesn't have to follow the set up --
The should have been prepared for it. The response is raise your hand and tell Ted that every one of us can beat Bush. Is that so hard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. If they raised their hands - They would not be given a chance to explain
It was totally orchestrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. It's a quick sentence --
You just say it while you're raising your hand. It's not hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. What do they do, shout it out?
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 09:37 PM by SahaleArm
Doesn't work that way - Ted is the controller and runs the show. They were asked the question at the same time, not individually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. So now you know why Dean is our man.
The rest of them are not running in the interests of their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudGerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. oh c'mon
Dean raising his hand to state that he thinks Dean can beat Bush shows that he's the only one thinking of his constituents?

If all the candidates were running for the Democratic Nomination, then yes, each of them should have, and probably would have raised their hands. But they aren't running for the Democratic Nomination. Each and every one of them now is running for President. Have been since each one announced they were running.

I'm gonna hold off the doom and gloom until after the nomination and the non winners don't back the nominee. People will have long forgotten this debate by the time that happens. If the non winners do back the eventual nominee, then what happened here means absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftPeopleFinishFirst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. I give up
Seriously. I just give up on the whole lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Guys, c'mon, it's not as if everybody in the world is watching this debate
Only political junkies like us are preoccupied by this stuff...Unless the media takes it uopn themselves to put that little clip on all the top news shows all the time...Or am I just being naive?

Let's not say it's the end of the world until after the primaries...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. The problem is, it will be used
as a convenient sound bite if Dean does get the nomination, as if to say, "See, none of your fellow Democrats support your candidacy." Yeah, it was a gotcha trap and the other 8 (7?) fell right into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Koppel treats the candidates like this is a high school event,
and the Dems are running for class president. What a sophomoric question, he was setting an obvious trap, and it was absolutely beneath the dignity of this debate. Congrats to Dean for his self-confidence. As for the others, no comment. It's all too weird.

Maybe none of them raised their hand because they were trying too hard to keep from flipping Koppel the bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnAmerican Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #32
72. ROFL
"flipping Koppel the bird" That about sums it up. The whole question was total bullshit and I don't fault any of them for not falling for it. Hell, even Dean chuckled, realizing that it was a sophomoric attempt by Ted to arouse the others into attacking him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
35. Were you expecting something else?!
Every candidate for himself, it would seem.

At least they're acting honest. It's a bit PC, corny, and trite, all rolled into one, for all the candidates to chime "Any person up here can beat George Bush*..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Corny it may be, but it's about winning the election for the Dems --
And corn wins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yep. That was pitiful.
We ARE indeed our own worst enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belab13 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. missed that part of the debate but it sounds like it was a complete setup.
Koppel burn in HELL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. off point, but is anyone aware of a replay (PST)? Thks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. Replay at 7:00 PST.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. Whine whine whine
Moan and groan. It's all over. We lost. Boo hoo. Good grief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. We just gave Bush a very nice ad, free of charge --
That's kind of a big deal. It's time we prepare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. It's like they can't see the forrest through the trees
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 09:04 PM by populistmom
Makes me want to shake each of them and say, "It means more than just YOU, idiot!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
48. Debate, the object is to win. Of course they didnt play cheerleader for De
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. That's right --
The object is to win, and they just made it harder for whoever wins the nomination. Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Its a mean nasty world out here
They volunteered to play the game and you cant get upset when they dont play like you think they should
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Yes, it is mean and nasty --
That's why you don't allow mistakes like this to happen. The ultimate victory that we all care about won't come through division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
54. Wrong, they gave the right answer
It was a trick question to which either answer would have been bad. They choose the one that was least damaging for their own campaigns, despite the attempt to make this debate the "annoint Dean show".

If they raised their hands, imagine how much worse the questions that followed would have been: "Why don't you drop out, you have already admitted that Dean can win, he's got the momentum, why drag this out?"

No, they wouldn't have been able to defend themselves from the coming attack that Koppel had in store for them nearly as effectively if they had basically given their "endorsement" to Dean in the first minute, which is exactly what Koppel was trying to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. hmmm you make a good point
and I cant argue with that. Its one of those damned if you do questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Hardly --
One simple sentence said as they raised their hands would have done it all. "We can all beat Bush, Ted." 'Nuff said. It wouldn't have been hard. It shouldn't have been hard. But I guess it is for these guys. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. What, they were supposed to yell out slogans in unison?
As they raised their hands? They had no idea that question was coming, and there is no way they would be allowed to comment.

It was all a setup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
55. This is flame bait
Nobody screwed up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Yeah, they did --
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
60. What the heck is wrong with you people?...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but why should any of the Docratic nominees be supporting the nomination of another Democrat? If any of the Democrats had answered the question, yes or no, how would that have looked to their own backers?

Some of you folks are going out of your way to pick fights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
63. and people think Koppel is good at what he does
what a fucking idiot to ask that question...

And he's a leftie !

I might expect it of O'Reilly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
64. Maybe they were just answering honestly
Would you prefer that they had lied?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
65. Nevermind all that
Are they still beating their wives? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HighTide Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
66. we eat our own
so sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
67. Nice way for the rest of the field to alienate Dean supporters
Dumb asses. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. That is right
I wish the mods would lock this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
70. No win situation
There was no possible way to answer the question. It was a total set-up. The possibilities:

1. Raise hand = the candidate endorses Dean and doesn't have their heart in the race

2. Don't raise hand = the candidate doesn't support the Party and is egotistical

Also, at the time of the question there was no way to know that they would all get a minute to explain their answer. I fully expected two or three to discuss why they didn't raise their hand, but not to focus on it for so long.

The debate was horrible from beginning to end. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyInc Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. I agree...
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 12:09 AM by johnnyInc
For any of the other candidates to raise their hand would have meant that they believed that Dean will be the nominee instead of them. Logic 101 - in order to beat Bush, Dean would have to beat them first. So saying that Dean can beat Bush is the same as saying Dean can beat them. If the question was posed in a different way, like "Do you believe the Democratic nominee will beat Bush?" I think you would have seen every hand fly up.

Just MHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC