Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just saw the attack ad on Dean.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:24 PM
Original message
I just saw the attack ad on Dean.
Is it factualy correct? http://clubforgrowth.com/

It says he is raising taxes of all kinds. If this is true about Dean's tax position, how could he handle an ad like that in the General Election. The response ad he puts out does not address the tax issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. no, it's not factually correct
they're using the wrong kind of averages, when the average actually is $300. The averages they're using are from the upper middle class tier and the tier above that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What about the individual taxes they list
dividend, death, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. just all lies
do you really trust the RW ads to be truthful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. No
but Dean is going to "raise taxes". Which ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. be realistic...how do you suppose the fed. deficit is going to shrink?
Americans are going to "stuck" with a major deficit thanks to shrub. Any candidate that says they can do this without raising taxes or abolishing what has happened is "nuts".

Look at Arnolds plight in Calif. it's fine to talk the talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. through "growth"
:eyes:

Ronnie and Milton Freidman finallly won out. Even some liberals have begun to accept this economic untruth - as truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. through growth, taxes and cuts in spending.....it's more than one
i can't see manufactuing flocking back to the US...where is the job growth plan?

It's complicated and alot of hard choices will need to be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just saw the response ad on CSPAN
And they handled it quite well, stating that as governoer he cut taxes twice while raising the miimum wage, providing health insurance for all the states children and prescription drug coverage for most of the state's seniors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a lie...
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 02:31 PM by Patriot_Spear
These ad's wouldn't be allowed if they were required to meet the same test of proof as in product advertising.

It's a shame they can't be sued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dean says we are going back to the CLinton tax schedules...
and that is effective, because most people remember the Clinton years as a positive economic experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm all for rasing taxes!
We gotta pay for the government somehow and I'd rather see high taxes than a lack of services or funding for arts, etc.

Though, I believe this ad distorts the Good Doctor's position, like any good smear ad does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. This message might work
with Democrats. But it won't fare well during the general election, no matter how it is spinned. Whether it's $300 or $2000, raising taxes will be the nail on the coffin.

56%-61% approval for Bush, doesn't give solace that even at his worst, Bush still pulls in a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Tell me
Did anyone claim Clinton was going to raise taxes when he was running in 1992?

Did Clinton win or lose that election?

What was Bush's approval rating in December 1991?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Clinton ran on a platform that included middle class tax cuts.
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 03:36 PM by BillyBunter
Dean is running on a platform of raising taxes across the board. So it would be kind of difficult to credibly claim Clinton was going to raise taxes, whereas to claim Dean is going to raise taxes, all one must do is show a clip from one of his red-faced speeches. You then get two propaganda benefits for the price of one: a red faced little man angrily sputtering that he will raise taxes, at a time when the economy is beginning to rebound strongly. A votewinner for sure, that. For someone, anyway.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPURGEMAN23 Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dean has a plan
This is my first post. I have been watching politics for a while and anyone who watched the pundits during the 2000 election saw the Gore pundits were constantly on the defensive. The other day on Inside Politics Ed Gellispe was on and Before Judy asked him a quesion, she read a statement from the Dean campaign that labled, truthfully, Ed as an Enron Lobbyist. That immediately put him on the defensive and essentially discredited him. I was thrilled. It was brilliant.

That is how the Dean campaign is different....they have a plan...they have learned from the past. They are successful at defining themselves.

The general election will be about what Dean wants it to be not the Cons.

He can run on taxes, healthcare, Iraq, terrorism and the corporate thievery because he is RIGHT and Bush is WRONG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's hilarious! I didn't know that Mouse Gillespie was an
ENRON lobbyist! (Not that I'm surprised.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. He was THE Enron lobbyist
How do you think he got the RNC gig?

In this aspect, Dean's operation reminds me a lot of the Clinton campaign in 91 and 92. That instant-reaction team is awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That instant reaction team
gets us the label of mindless anger mongers from certain folks and their candidates!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Oh My
I can't WAIT to see how this is going to play out.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Welcome to DU, Superman23!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPURGEMAN23 Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Thanks
It is refreshing to find a place where people actually think before they speak (post).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. welcome to DU!!!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Hi SPURGEMAN23!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Welcome Spurgeman!
I'm not even going to ask what "spurgeman" means, I think I don't want to know.

But welcome! :hi:

By the way, you are correct: the Dean campaign has all the right moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. No, It's A Huge Lie...
Bring back the death tax, what horseshit! It isn't repealed until 2010 or so and then the repeal is set to expire the next year. Krugman calls it the "Throw Momma From The Train" Act.

The average is completely distorted. As you know if Bill Gate and I are in the same room our AVERAGE net worth is $17 Billion. That's the kind of phony, fuzzy math they're using.


The way to counter it is just the way MoveOn did. I saw that add and it's good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. Perhaps the essential problem
is that too many people have a total disconnect between paying taxes and getting services. Yeah, Bush has cut taxes, but mainly for the upper classes. And we're all paying more local taxes, tuition at public colleges and universities is going to climb out of sight, services are being cut everywhere, but that's good, right? Because Democrats would RAISE OUR TAXES!

Clinton, I believe, actually did raise taxes on the upper income folks. And we had the longest peacetime expansion ever.

George Bush cut taxes for the wealthy, and there's been a net loss of nearly three million jobs so far. Coincidence? You decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPURGEMAN23 Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. The problem is deeper
Cons have been sucessful in making there views be reported as mainstream on taxes and other "important issues" like God, guns and gays, thus intimidating elected Democratic officials.

Ask Jean Carnahan how it helped to vote for the first Tax cut to keep it from being an issue. She lost, i think she would have won if she rallied her base against it.

Democrats need to stop playing on the Con field and take the ball and play on their own terms and make the Cons come over and play.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat M. Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. Basically, it's correct.
By repealing ALL Bush tax cuts, he repeals all the individual ones the ad mentions, such as the estate tax (which they call the death tax), and the others that you listed.

The Bush tax cuts were very wide ranging and weren't just cuts on income tax.

I'm in favor of repealing the estate taxcuts, which Clark would also do by repealing the taxes on the wealthiest two percent (the only ones whom estate taxes really affect).

Dean will not survive the general election campaign if he's nominated. It will be hard enough for ANY democrat who wants to repeal some of those taxcuts. They will get hammered on it. But to say they want to repeal ALL the taxcuts--well, you can bet the ads Rove and the RNC run will paint Dean as a tax and spend liberal.

Then there is Dean's record in Vermont...he raised several different taxes and raised them quite a bit. (And yes, Dean supporters, this is true. I'm someone who researches very carefully.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Wow, way to agree with the RNC
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. Look who runs the Club for Puke
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 07:31 PM by BuckeFushe
Founded in 1999 by Steve Moore, National Review president Dusty Rhodes, Cato Institute president Ed Crane, Richard Gilder, economist and CNBC Kudlow & Cramer co-host Larry Kudlow and other like-minded pro-growth conservatives, the Club for Growth sends campaign contributions from our members to the most free-market oriented candidates in tight, but winnable races.

Additionally, repealing tax cuts are not RAISING taxes, they are simply returning the rates to where they WERE. But the pukes love to distort this fact. It you didn't have it to begin with, how can it be raised?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KFC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. What?
"Additionally, repealing tax cuts are not RAISING taxes, they are simply returning the rates to where they WERE."

Nonsense, you omitted the variable of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. They are going to use that track
because he is camapigning about repealing their tax cuts to close the deficit. I could have told you that would be their strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC