Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The difference between Dean and McGovern

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:28 PM
Original message
The difference between Dean and McGovern
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 01:31 PM by kentuck
As someone who actively supported George McGovern, because I knew what a crook Richard Nixon was, I think there is a difference between Howard Dean and George McGovern. First of all, the country was not ready for McGovern's message. This was before Watergate and most voters were much more naive than after Watergate.

True, they were both against the war but McGovern was running not that long after Woodstock and the riots of the 60's. A lot of centrist voters were frightened of the long hair "radicals" that were supporting McGovern. They were associated with marijuana and the drug culture. I do not think the same can be said about Dean's supporters today.

Although the anti-war movement was very active, it was considered much more "violent" than the movement of today. At least, that was the perception of a majority of voters, in my opinion. Coupled with the fact that Dean is not directly connected to the "druggies", as was McGovern, voters are not afraid to vote for Dean. That is why I do not agree with those editorialists that try to make the comparison. The only comparison is that they were both anti-war. That is where the comparison stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good points
Also, the simple fact is that in no way CAN Dean be just like McGovern. Nothing is the same since 1972. Can you imagine Helen Reddy if she just started out today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with you.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean is not Anti-war, he was anti-Iarq-war at the time
Let's look back at the build up to the war in Iraq to see why Dean was anti-Iraq -
shrub had just passed 2 rounds of tax cuts
we were not done in Afghanistan
N. Korea was looming
the ball had been dropped in Israel
inspecters were in Iraq
we had somewhat successfully contained Saddam
we really did need support from the UN including Russia, China, France and Germany
plus there was no case for imminent danger

Dean was very pragmatic in opposing the war, he looked at the facts along with the costs, and said "no a good idea for right now".

I don't remember the McGovern campaign all that well, but I honestly do not see the resemblance folks make between Dean and McGovern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't McGovern Actually A Liberal?
Dean switched positions on several issues just before running for President. Dean governed from the center right.

I think the similarity between Dean & McGovern is more intended to highlight the fact that McGovern captured the Democratic base in the primaries but failed to win in the General Election.

In this analogy, I personally agree.

Dean might be able to squeak by, but it won't be enough to overcome Diebold.

We need a Candidate who can consistently poll Nationwide at above 55%.

We need a Candidate who can win by a landslide.

We need a Candidate who will be able to claim a Mandate upon taking office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes!
McGovern was unabashedly and totally liberal!

IMO, had he been nominated, he would have been beaten as badly as Dukakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. In hindsight, the McGovern voters were much wiser than the Nixon voters
Don't you agree? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree...
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 02:07 PM by liberalmuse
though the only thing I remember about McGovern is hanging around his campaign headquarters when I was 5 years old, staring at the American flag and the cool campaign buttons, or just doing kid stuff while my mom volunteered. Unfortunately, she was lured into Christian fundamentalism, and now votes 'pub.

Dean is much more centrist than McGovern, and his pragmatism and common sense approach to issues are going to sit well with the average (thinking) American. He definitely isn't a one-issue candidate. Dean has what it takes to get the center vote all the way to the far left vote. There's not much we can do about the Bush-worshipping masses who choose to steep their brains in ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. In some ways there are more parallels to Clark than Dean.
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 02:18 PM by spooky3
In other ways, there are more parallels to Kerry, Edwards, Gephardt, Lieberman.

McGovern's decorated war service would appeal to some people for whom Clark's distinguished service is appealing.

Like Kerry et al., McGovern was a senator, not a governor. Governors have had more success winning presidential elections in the past half century.

McGovern was widely perceived as a "nice" but not charismatic man. I think several of the candidates, once they are better known by Jane and Joe Public, will be seen as more charismatic than he was.

My point is that McGovern's situation is quite different from that facing the Democratic contenders and that you can draw as many (or as few) comparisons to other candidates as to Dean. While it's good to study the past and try not to repeat the mistakes of failed prior campaigns (and McGovern's is not the only one that should be studied) it's important not to overreact to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadFaith Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not the same.
While McGovern ran on the peace platform he did vote, albeit reluctantly, for the Tonkin Gulf Resolution that essentially began the Vietnam conflict in full and was also drawn upon to wage military action in Cambodia and other Southeast Asian nations. If we're comparing wars, and the TGR would be to Vietnam what the IWR is to Iraq II, than this analogy would fall more in line with a candidate who voted for the resolution but are now campaigning against the war, of which there are none. No condidate currently in the primary both voted FOR the IWR and are now calling for a full withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Of the four who were able to vote and voted yes (Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman, and Gephardt), none are currently running on a "Full Withdrawal" platform.

As well, McGovern dropping his V.P. nominee had a severe impact on his campaign. Sen. Thomas Eagleton was dropped when it was revealed shortly after the party convention that he had been hospitalized on three occasions for depression and had undergone electroshock therapy. He was replaced by Robert Shriver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. good point -
repressed the Eagleton affair - poor advance work on the part of McGovern's staff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That would be Sargent Shriver?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadFaith Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes.
Sargent Shriver...

aka R. Sargent Shriver
aka Robert Sargent Shriver
aka Father of "Ma-Ree-Uh!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC