Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A sudden thought concering the Diebold election boxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:12 AM
Original message
A sudden thought concering the Diebold election boxes
An interesting thought concerning the theoretical hacked Diebold smartcard "keys to the kingdom" that have been mentioned in article after article-- what would happen if suddenly said keys (or concise directions on how to create them) were to flood the streets? That is to say, some no-doubt unscrupulous persons were to actually manufacture them and pass them out on streetcorners, or instructions were to be posted on web sites and in internet forums, etc.

If this were to happen, and then be discovered by the public and reported on, and absolutely proven, what would then happen? Would it be ignored in the hopes it went away (while copies are being made in basements across the country)? Would the information spread, and finally force Diebold to either verifiably secure its boxes, or withdraw them before the election? Would they cancel the election process altogether, instead of reverting to paper ballots? What excuse would they give?

At the least, this would level the playing field considerably, and if a rigged election WERE planned by someone bent on carrying out a coup (theoretically), a few thousand or more hacked keys would upset applecarts across the country. It is safe to assume chaos would reign supreme, and the election would be unverifiable in any sense of the word, if they still insisted on using the Diebold boxes. The point would be proven, but I think the price would be terribly high, for Diebold, certainly, and yes, for We The People.

What would happen?

NOTE: I do not advocate this scenario actually taking place, nor would I endorse it or take part in it if it were to happen. This post is to be considered a theoretical concept placed FOR DISCUSSION ONLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do not advocate this either.. but it is an interesting idea...
A very interesting idea...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like they had two sets of software, one for the certifiers
Now they have gone and overwritten the last one with yet another version

They, having proprietary, secret code, can stay a step ahead and

to do what you suggest an insider with up to date version of backdoors

would have to come forward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. True: But this is more than just an idea... it is a concept.
Good point DUReader.... and that is exactly what they will be saying. On the other hand. This is more than an idea... it is a concept.... there are countless holes in these machines and many of the exploits may well be still wide open.

Also. The fact that people might just be considering this idea kind of prooves the point about the need for open source software - or at the very least public scrutiny of certification (which is presently VERBOTEN).

Personally I would favour a return to paper ballots - counting at the booth with a result declared in every polling place publicly.

This is how we vote here in NZ and until recently I thought this is the way everybody voted.

This thread needs a good kicking methinks... this is an idea that is extremely powerful simply as an idea.... it is also a fantastic story angle for some enterprising media to explore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They SAY the code that's in the wild is outdated
but they absolutely REFUSE to prove it, so why take their word that they actually are updating it to the point that the key to the kingdom will no longer work? If they close the holes, then THEY can no longer do what it is obvious they have done in the past-- rig the vote. They would have to rewrite it altogether to change or hide their own keys. Until they do that, there's no reason to think a hacked key will no longer work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I love your logic Prisoner 6....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC