Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wingnut statement...this just can't be true

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 01:58 PM
Original message
Wingnut statement...this just can't be true
I was out for happy hour with some people last night. One wingnut Bush lover talked about Smirky's trip to Iraq (the fake-turkey photo-op trip) over thanksgiving.

The wingnut said that he was impressed by Smirky's trip because it was the first time ever that a president had ever visited a war zone.

Is that even true? Surely FDR visited London during the bombings of that city during WWII? (maybe not, i have not had the chance to look it up. which is why i'm asking.)

Even so, didn't the deserter-in-chief declare "mission accomplished" while displaying his presidential package on the Lincoln? The press release said "combat operations were over" or something, that later got changed to "major combat operations..." So the wingnut's claim falls apart because according to the junta, combat is over?

Plus, the idiot son of an asshole visited a secure location in Iraq, so it wasn't exactly a war zone, was it?

Is the wingnut's statement coming from the Pigman (the junkie), or just some local freak on hate radio...

I don't know why I am even posting this, as any attempt to figure out wingnut statements is a ridiculous exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does Lincoln count? Living in a warzone, after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Lincoln, FDR, Johnson, Clinton. They all visited the troops during war.
Only the media did a great job of confusing the hapless, great unwashed. All day long, they talked of Bush's daring historic trip. How he was the FIRST PRESIDENT EVER TO VISIT THE TROOPS DURING A TIME OF WAR


in iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I know. Where do these people think Abe was? 5 miles from the lines
surrounded by troops for nearly four years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I believe he also visited the frontlines...
...once or twice.

as for Smirky, the visit was for less than three hours, and they were prepared to abort it if there was the slightest hint it had leaked out. Thus, he was gone before any attempt to attack him could be organized, and every precaution to assure his safety was taken. Roosevelt was probably in greater danger from German subs when he met Churchill on a battleship, even though they weren't in a war zone.

The REAL truth is that if his entire Iraq policy had been planned with the same thoroughness and care as that trip, he would never have had to make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Lincoln made just over 40 trips to battlefields and units
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 04:49 PM by rmpalmer
Think how dangerous Lincoln's trips were over railroad and road when Confederate calvary was about.

FDR travelled overseas to meet Churchill and Stalin.

Truman, LBJ, and Nixon all traveled to war zone.

I hope you see that wingnut at happy hour again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Teddy Roosevelt - maybe Abe Lincoln?
Actually I don't recall any other pres visiting an "active" warzone... but could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Teddy Roosevelt?
I can't think of which war? When did he visit a war front? I'm assuming the question meant as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll let you in on a little secret...Shhhhh
ALWAYS MAKE THEM PROVE THEIR STATEMENTS. Always assume they are wrong, and make them prove that they are right. That's what they do.

If you won't believe it, try telling the wingnut that Bush* went AWOL. One will get you ten that the response is "Prove it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Good idea, but
You can't expect anyone to prove a negative...that something didn't happen. It's impossible.

So, if they make a positive idiotic statement, such as Bill Clinton met with communists, you say...prove it! But if they say, Bill Clinton never went to Cleveland, the onus is on the person who asserts that Clinton did go to Cleveland to make the proof.

In this case, someone has posted a picture of Clinton in Bosnia below. That's all the proof we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Good point, but
irrelevant. I still maintain we should make them work. It's up to them to point out the inability to prove a negative. And if they are smart enough to use that argument, the response "Oh, I see. Another conservative who makes claims with no evidence to support it. You must think you're Colin Powell and I'm the UN"

Never give them an inch!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I agree with Sangh0...
...but I promise not to make a habit of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Well, it would still be fair to ask about their source
That in itself might be a show stopper. Especially if the source was Lambast, Shammity, O'Looney or the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I like that!
Then you can respond "AHA! The liberal media strikes again!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Excellent Suggestion... here's another
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 02:17 PM by Patriot_Spear
My personal favorite retort is, 'Where'd you hear that- AM radio? Try college next time...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Johnson went to Nam I think.
A little before my time but I recall that was just one more new similarity between the two quagmires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. yeah, Johnson went at the height of the war, no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. lbj and nixon both went to the nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:03 PM
Original message
Roosevelt went to Casablanca, Cairo, and Teheran...
...as well as traveled by sea to Newfoundland, during WWII, but never went to London.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Eisenhower went to Korea, but
it may have been in his president-elect period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evil_orange_cat Donating Member (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. FDR held meetings on warships...
LBJ went to Vietnam...

And plus, the War is over, according to Bush "Mission Accomplished"... so he wasn't in a warzone! :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton went to Kosovo
with Hillary and Chelsea, for crying out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. most have


I believe that is President Clinton in Bosnia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Many have gone; LBJ went to Nam twice; Clinton went to eat with troops in
Kosovo; Nixon went to Nam; it's not a new thing.
That's why Chimpy HAD to go...he would have looked even worse for not going, especially after the little banner charade, when it came out that the carrier was just miles offshore and all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. and had to bring his fake Turkey for the photo op
Which Turkey is fake? They both are!!!! ha-ha-ha

God forbid the trip was about meeting the troops, talking with them, shaking their hands

Nope, emphasis was put on bringing a fake Turkey for a good picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not true
A DUer recenetly suggested to assume anything coming from a freeper is initialy false unless they have proof or you know it's true. This is another lie. Troops have been visited by the president in the field going back to I think the Civil War. I know for certain that there were presidential visits during Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. LBJ visited VietNam
But I have to take issue with one thing you said.

unless they have proof or you know it's true

IMO, you should demand proof even if you know it's true. Make them work for it. They have no credibility. Don't give them an inch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Right on! Get them used to proving their statements. That's how
teachers teach us when we're in school and for those who didn't learn that in school, we'lljust have to teach them.

Statement like this? "Really? Can you prove that?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Washington led troops while president. Lincoln visited battlefields
As for more modern presidents, maybe not. Considering all of our wars have been overseas, and until the last few decades visiting a war zone would have been very time consuming and too dangerous, maybe not. No one visited Viet Nam or Korea. JFK visited Berlin, but that's not exactly a war zone. Then again, our invasion and occupation of Iraq isn't what anyone in the past would have called a war, either. It's kind of like calling a Harlem Globetrotters exhibition a basketball game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yep, Lincoln
You might also point out the obvious: that Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower actually fought in real wars and didn't go AWOL, unlike Gov. Bush. For that matter, Lincoln himself served for a short while in the military; he used to make jokes about his encounters with "bloodthirsty mosquitoes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. This shouldn't surprise you...
...but the wingnut is either ill-informed, uneducated, lying, or willfully ignorant...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bush in harm's way
What I read was that it was the first time since Ike that a Prez had travelled to an active war zone. Tricky Dick in the 'Nam? Hell, that's wild! First time I've heard about that. I'd love to see the photos. I'm surprised that particular commander-in-chief wasn't fragged by his own troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Didn't Truman go to Korea?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 02:21 PM by DemXCGI
I could have sworn I've heard this before.

On Edit: Whoops! That was Ike. My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. *ahem* war zone? I thought the "mission was accomplished"
Ask him why the iraqis didn't have a parade in his honor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. Madison and Lincoln under enemy fire while President
James Madison was under British fire at the Battle of Bladensburg during the War of 1812. A debacle that was soon followed by the burining of Washington.

Abraham Lincoln was under fire by Confederate forces at Fort Stevens (Now on the grounds of Walter Reed Army Hospital I believe), when Jubal Early made his ill-fated attack on Washington late in the war in an attempt to break Grants hold around Petersburg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bush and Dolly Madison: War Heros

Here are a few. Were no Presidents ever near or in frontier territories during any of the scores of Indian Wars?

24 Aug 1814 - President James Madison witnesses US forces defeat at Bladensburg, Maryland
1861-1864 - Lincoln was continually within striking distance
Early Aug 1941 - FDR met Churchill in Atlantic Conference
28 Nov 1943 - FDR went to Tehran
27 Jul 1953 - Eisenhower visited
30 Jul 1969 - Nixon visited Vietnam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. Truman went to Korea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. He is the first to do it since the last President...
Clinton went to Kosovo..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. Now wait a minute.... Junior said the war was over on May 1
..therefore, he couldn't possibly have been in a war zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. not true
many president's, the most dangerous trip was likely Lincoln's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. Shrub said major combat was over in May,
so was that Thanksgiving visit to a war zone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpibel Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. What a difference a word makes -- It was a first, just a trivial one
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 03:10 PM by dpibel
Edited to correct coding for unnecessary italics.

The real first (and I am not trying to give credit where credit is due, because there is no credit due the Fierce Warrior Chieftain) was: First president to visit Iraq.

Since both the modern media and the rabid right operate at the level of kindergartners playing "Gossip," what happened is that some talking head (or some empty head, listener or purveyor) heard "first" and missed what it was the first of, and recounted it as "war zone" instead of "Iraq."

And the mistake sounds much cooler than the truth, so that's what we run with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC