Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the media not so subtly pushing Howard Dean as the nominee ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:50 PM
Original message
Is the media not so subtly pushing Howard Dean as the nominee ?
I just heard Tweety mention that he had pulled ahead in either NH or Iowa? Of course, he was on Tweety show the other night and came across pretty good. And now, Peggy Noonan is building him...I am starting to worry. They want him as the candidate, it appears. Anybody else thought about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure it's pushing
I think they're assuming that the candidate who raises the most money will win the nomination. That's been true historically, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Right, and the media love to report scandals
they would never pass up an opportunity to hype a scandal right...

Oops, I just now remembered a whole shitload of bush* scandals that

they mentioned in passing and never touched again.

Let me see now, ...hmm....... what do we know about the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. By that logic
Steve Forbes would have kicked ass running as the nominee of the Republican Party!

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhosNext Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. What did Reagan's stalker (Noonan) say about Dean?
I'm wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. She was complimentary.
That he had not changed. That he was an outsider running against the establishment-type of candidate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. i saw her do the same thing after the last debate
she is spooky..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, they are pushing...it's not a bad thing...it will help the Dem party
But, the country would be at a disadvantage as a whole because they are being denied a fair look @ Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. How are they being denied?
He's on the the talk shows constantly. He's on Tweety next week. Clark gets as much exposure as anybody else, and more than some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Stories in November
But somebody posted this the other day:

Lexis-Nexis Academic

Search in: General News/Major Papers/Headline, Lead
Paragraph(s), Terms/11/01/2003 to 11/30/2003:

Howard Dean: 606; Wesley Clark: 144
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
52. Media largely GOP organs, got worse under Poppy & Pruneface...
It's not a figment of anyone's imagination. There's a reason the GOP likes Dean. He's getting set up to get clobbered.

Here's some background for those who may not know about the changes the news media have gone through over the past two decades ... largely under the direction of former CIA Director and President George Herbert Walker Bush, aka Poppy:

excerpts from the book

On Bended Knee

The Press and the Reagan Presidency


by Mark Hertsgaard

Farrar Straus Giroux, 1988
p3

We have been kinder to President Reagan than any President that I can remember since I've been at the Post."

So said Benjamin C. Bradlee, executive editor of The Washington Post, some four months before the November 1984 re-election of Ronald Reagan. Three years later, after the Iran-Contra affair had shattered Mr. Reagan's previous image of invincibility, I asked the legendary editor if he still stood by his statement. He did. Stressing that this was "all totally subconscious," Bradlee explained that when Ronald Reagan came to Washington in 1980, journalists at the Post sensed that "here comes a really true conservative.... And we are known-though I don't think justifiably-as the great liberals. So, we've got to really behave ourselves here. We've got to not be arrogant, make every effort to be informed, be mannerly, be fair. And we did this. I suspect in the process that this paper and probably a good deal of the press gave Reagan not a free ride, but they didn't use the same standards on him that they used on Carter and on Nixon."

Even with all that eventually went wrong-the Iran-contra scandal, the stock-market crash, the seemingly endless series of criminal investigations of former top White House officials-the overall press coverage of the Reagan administration was extraordinarily positive. It is rare indeed for public officials to express satisfaction with their press coverage-in the words of NBC News White House correspondent Andrea Mitchell, "Politicians always say they want a fair press, when what they really want is a positive press"-but the men in charge of media and public relations in the Reagan White House were, almost unanimously, quite pleased with how their President was treated.

James Baker, White House chief of staff during the first term and Secretary of the Treasury during the second, told me, "There were days and times and events we might have some complaint about, on balance and generally speaking, I don't think we had anything to complain about in terms of first-term press coverage. "

David Gergen, former White House director of communications, confirmed shortly after leaving the administration in January 1984 that President Reagan and most of his advisers had come to believe that the basic goal of their approach to the news media-"to correct the imbalance of power with the press so that the White House will once again achieve a 'margin of safety' "- had finally been attained.

CONTINUED...

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ronald_Reagan/On_Bended_Knee.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's earned it
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 07:58 PM by killbotfactory
He's the best fundraiser, has the most supporters, and is ahead or close to first in most polls.

This despite the media calling him the next McGovern, unelectable because he opposed the war, peaked too soon (every month it seems), was "destroyed" by Russert, the confederate flag nonsense, and being called a rookie waffler by Geppy and Kerry.

edit:

Almost forgot about the forbidden sealed documents of mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. If they are, it's only because KKKarl Rove has assured them that
...Dean is "unelectable".

Just like Clinton was in 1991. (and sadly, the jellybean brain in 1980)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't see how
tearing down a candidate can be called "pushing." Dean gets lots of limelight, yeah, but he gets most of the criticism as well. While his record is getting microscoped, the other candidates are under no such scrutiny. So it works both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Frank Luntz praises Dean and that should say it all.
Luntz is the chief crafter for GOP propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. if that says it all…
why did Ed gillespie (RNC chair) feel the need to travel to Vermont yesterday for the express purpose of attacking Dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Having Frank Luntz pushing a Dem for months means nothing to you?
How interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan and Republican pollster Frank Luntz...
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 08:02 PM by NNN0LHI
...both said Dean is the man Kentuck. Why the hell am I so worried?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. He IS the man
He's ahead in the polls, especially in the first 2 states to vote.

He's ahead in fundraising. Way ahead, if you consider he has opted out.

He appears to be very well organized with a devoted and growing group of supporters.

He scored key union endorsements last month, despite a major flap about a comment he made, and also some key congressional endorsements.

Maybe they are saying Howard is the man because he IS the man.
Why does everything have to be a conspiracy?

I would be a lot more suspicious if they were constantly telling us that Joe Lieberman was the candidate to beat, when there is very little evidence of his campaign success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Look, Dean earned his status
He was not given this.

I agree that the media is more scared of Clark and Kerry, but Dean fought for his place right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I definitely think Dean gets most of the media attention
out of all the candidates right now. That's both positive and negative attention. Whether it's just because he has the most in the campaign bank or if there's another reason, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. The media is pushing him as the frontrunner, I suppose.
Which makes it easier on them. They really don't like to pound more than one candidate at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Please tell me what you think they should be saying?
Dean is leading the polls in the first 2 primaries.
Dean has the largest grass roots support base.
Dean has the most money.
Dean has larger campaign staffs in the primary states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Hey that's what I just said!
:)

Ssssh...maybe there's NO CONSPIRACY. Maybe it's just TRUE.

But then again, Peggy Noonan? Eeeeek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. No conspiracy???
Well if there's no conspiracy, then how do you explain posting the same thing as unfrigginreal around the SAME TIME???!!! The two of you must be secret members of the gop who work for the Dean campaign and infiltrate DU while also telling all the political journalists what to write and say! Coincidence??? I think NOT! I'm on to you Amerikav...I'm on to you. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. LOL
SHHH...don't let everybody in on it.

Chat at you later...I have to go cash that Freerepublic paycheck that Trippi sent me.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Republicans are pushing Dean
The gooper on crossfire today said that he's "for Dean." I'm sorry, Deanies, but they want Dean. Probably because of his bait-ability. He can be baited into making mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I don't go by what "they" want
"They" should be careful what they wish for. Remember, the Carter administration wanted Reagan. Bush1's administration wanted Clinton. Sometimes the thing you really want comes and bites you in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Bull Shit
hasn't happened yet. Five term Governer and it did not happen. Take you and your rethug candidate bashing some where else, you won't be missed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't think so -- At MeetUp tonight
I was at a small, unofficial MeetUp where they played a tape of a Dean talk for MeetUps and then Trippi from the MeetUp 2 months ago (oct). Trippi made it very clear that the difference in the polls in NH and IA was due to the letters. He went on a bit how they'd tracked the numbers and that's how influential the handwritten letters were.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. does a wild bear defecate in the shubbery?
Ummm....yeah. Glad you noticed.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. I Hope so
If it is true then i can at last agree with the neo-cons. we both want Dean. lol They Repubs are crapping in there pants. Dean is there worst night mare. Go Dr. Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes, Dean is the neocon nightmare--they would rather run against a LIBERAL
And Dean is no liberal--he is a conservative. THey are afraid because Dean is actually more conservative than Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Think like Rove and then ask yourself
Who do I want * to be running against?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Al Sharpton?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. That would explain Tucker Carlson always rooting for Sharpton
a few months ago, wouldn't it? :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Tucker is a crypto-NAZI.
It may be he mentions Al Sharpton in order to associate the Democrats with the party of Tawana Bradley, the minorities, and the poor. Real subtlety, his.

When Al Franken was co-host last summer, Tucker made a point of calling him "Al Sharpton" during the intro and closing sections. A real fine turd, that Tucker.

Remember what Gore Vidal said to him? "What exactly is a 'Tucker'?" That shut his wug.

Hee ha ha ha ha (maniacal Democratic Donkey laugh)!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. John Kerry?
Someone who'll take his time responding to attacks? Like Michael Dukakis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Obviously the financial powerhouse candidate
with the most effecient campaign machine, and the most supporters.

Obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDem Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes , Go here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. Did Gray Davis Want To Run Against Riordan Or Simon?
Did Gray Davis win relection by influencing the primary in CA?

Did Arnold Schwartzenegger get 24/7 positive coverage from the press during the recall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. You mean when he attacked Riordan in the primaries
so that he could face Simon in the general? Sort of like this:

Bush's Party Takes Direct Aim at Howard Dean

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush's Republican Party took direct aim at former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean on Wednesday in one of the party's strongest attacks on an individual Democratic candidate for president this campaign season.

<snip>

The attack on Dean suggested a sharpening Republican focus on the former Vermont governor, who is leading in the polls over eight rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination. In New Hampshire, Dean has a double-digit poll lead over Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry in the run-up to the state's first-in-the-nation primary on Jan. 27.

http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=803654&tw=wn_wire_story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. No, Like Kristol Praised Dean Even After Kerry Kicked Dean's Ass
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 10:14 PM by cryingshame
In a debate. 'Dean makes a stupid comment about his lack of Foreign Policy Experience is acceptable because Junior made it to President.

Kerry a few minutes later says, We elect a President not a staff.

And Big Freaking Deal about the link you provided! There's nothing more than a statement by the RNC head and the CHARACTERISATION BY THE MEDIA that the Republican Party is "attacking Dean".

The two sentences Gillespie gave about Dean are right here and they are HARDLY scathing. Nice try though!


"This is the same critic who earlier in the year told Americans that we should prepare for the day when the United States 'won't always have the strongest military' -- former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean," Gillespie said in a speech at St. Anselm College in Manchester.

"He is wrong about our military and his charge that the president was going to cut the combat pay for soldiers in Iraq and
Afghanistan is completely at odds with all facts," Gillespie said."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nazgul35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. No...
the media wants a horse race....

Right now they have Dean, they're just looking for the anti-Dean to come along....and until that happens, the media is only going to talk about the frontrunner and who will emerge as the main opponent....

Expect this to go on until Iowa...then it will all be about the top three...and after NH it will be about the top two and whomever may be able to knock off number two in the new primaries....

Expect money to dry up and candidates to bleed and drop out....the race will be over by mid Feb.....when 85%+ of the delegates have been awarded...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
38. they much prefer to have a leader, always have
remember McGuire and Sosa ? supposedly neck and neck but McGuire was always the leader. it gives them the option of bandwagoning or sniping as the mood dictates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. I've felt all along like Dean was being rammed down my throat by media.
And since I'll get flamed for saying that I'll
add that I'm trying to judge Dean as a candidate
independent of my perception that he's the media's choice.

But it's a little hard.
The Media has earned my deep mistrust, and since they're
constantly chanting that he's too liberal too liberal too
liberal...It's hard not to automatically assume the opposite
to be true.
Esp since his record in Vermont makes him appear to be a rather
conservative Dem in many ways.

I see a lot of things in his record and platform and demeanor
that I like, and consider him one of the three best candidates.
But the media factor is a negative (which may be totally unfair
to him.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. They're largely focused on Dean
whether that's intentional or not, I can't tell

Seems like they desperately want Dean to be seen as a "liberal" While I find it offensive to think of a Democrat as any less, they certainly talk about him as if he's the one they want.

No, I don't think they're that clever...they seem to think that Clark is the one that can beat them, and they're playing Dean to the hilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. Obviously.
As measured by the number of stories or the volume of editorial space devoted to the stories in print and broadcast, Dean's got the lion's share of coverage from the beginning when he was a broke nobody.

And when it comes to advertising, free publicity is good — even when it's "negative." Free editorial publicity is best — even if it misses the point. The reason? The press mentions add up in the public mind, making it difficult for the other candidates to get a thought in edgewise.

It’s heartening that more than a few DUers noticed this phenomenon over the past year and a half. Real insidious, that GOP. They’re not fooling everybody, thank Goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Dean is the corporate lobby's "Plan B"
If Bush cannot win, it won't make much matter if he loses to Dean, seeing as how Dean is just as good for them as Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
47. oh please......
this is usually the last cry of a dying campaign because their candidate isn't getting much spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marines for Clark Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Karl Rove wants Dean
The media wants him and also Karl Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. hey is getting a LOT of 'air time' ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. Not subtle at all.
Something that obvious doesn't qualify as subtle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC