Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Alternative to LIHOP and MIHOP: RBOHCMAN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:22 PM
Original message
An Alternative to LIHOP and MIHOP: RBOHCMAN
OK, the acronym is not snazzy, but this has always been my take on Bush & 9/11:

Responsible Because Of His Criminal Misconduct And Negligence

In other words: I don't believe, and it would take a lot to convince me, that Dubya's goons WANTED this to happen. Trifecta or no trifecta, the results of a thing like this are just too unpredictable, to say nothing of how sitting down and cold-bloodedly planning the murder of thousands of your own citizens and buddies in the Pentagon is different from hailing this windfall as a gift from the dark lord and gleefully perching on their bloodied corpses and feeding off the tragedy until you explode, which is clearly what happened.

However, the 9/11 report should make it clear that if Bush and his team had their priorities straight, they would have had a better shot at preventing this. But, alas, they were too busy cheating, stealing, and covering up the nefarious activities of their cronies to pay attention, and here we are.

In terms of impeachability, I don't see why RBOHCMAN shoudl be that much less potent than LIHOP. (MIHOP, of course, is a giant step up from that level of responsibility.) Also, I might point out that by redacting the document in order to cover their own asses, they are preventing the American government from understanding what led to 9/11 and doing something about it, so the next time something like this happens, it will be clear that Bush is RBOHCMAN.

It sucks either way, of course.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. LIHTI
I don't beleive any of this LIHOP/MIHOP stuff, it just doesn't make any sense at all IMO. I do believe in LIHTI: Let It Happen Through Incompetence. YEah they were busy acting like the greedy corrupt pigs that they are, but they still should have been paying attention to national security. We know Botch* was briefed that bin Laden was planning to attack the US and was planning to hijack airliners. Instead of, say, stepping up security at airports the dishonorable undignified weasel went on vacation for a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Much better acronym!
Thanks!

The Plaid Adder

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. that sounds like the CCCC
Edited on Fri Jul-25-03 05:43 PM by bpilgrim
Catastrophically Contagious CLUSTERFUCK Conspiracy :evilgrin:

been around awhile... ;-)

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think they got played
It's obvious they had the intelligence agencies back off investigations and also ignored any evidence sent their way. I don't think it was necessarily incompetence as much as it was doing favors for the Saudi's. IOW, they were in business together and got played. They were told by their business partners to back off certain people (The terrorists) and told not to worry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I pretty much agree
I wonder if the Saudis didn't outsmart Bush. He can't really do anything to them, since they are some of his biggest backers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. and that explains why they are protecting them now
:crazy:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Saudis role in Iran Contra
I read in an actual book that the Saudis were the largest financial contributor to the Iran-Contra crimes of the 1980s. If I can find the source and the quote, I'll post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey Shrub! BOHICA!
Bend Over, Here It Comes Again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. CSI;DT
Could've Stopped It; Didn't Try.

Incompetence suggests inability even to know what was going to happen or even imagine something close. But there were too many warnings to suggest incompetence or ignorance; there had to be something more.

Rice's classic flub, about not ever imagining planes would be flown into buildings, gave it all away, IMHO. They had many, many, many reasons to suspect something awful would happen, and they did nothing, absofuckinglutely nothing, to stop it. Even beefing up airport security, the red flags raised by the one-way tickets bought with cash, failure to scramble air defenses. Nah, sorry, you're not gonna convince me they didn't know something. If they'd been totally ignorant and it came as a complete surprise, why no scrambled planes? Two planes flown into the WTC, two more with transponders off, one on some kind of weird flight path, and no air defenses in action? Sorry, I didn't buy it then and I'm not buying it now.

LIHTMN -- Let It Happen Through Malign Neglect -- maybe, but nothing better, and it's too hard to pronounce anyway. I'm still more likely to go with LIHOP or even MIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds good to me. That is pretty much my take on it.
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoYaCallinAlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. No doubt about it. He could have done more.
I don't know if it would have saved any lives, but there is no doubt in my mind that the Bush administration could have done a better job pre 9-11. Who knows how many lives could have been saved if he was paying more attention to the theat of terrorism. Even one life would have been worth the extra effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC