This is a followup from LoganSquare's thread on the PBS Tech columnist "I, Cringeley".
DU ThreadCringeley columnI followed papau's suggestion and wrote to the author.
My email:
Bob --
I'm concerned about the voting machine flaws I saw in your column and elsewhere. I hope you will write more about the issue.
A lot of the research is being done by Democrats who are partisan but seem to be truly concerned about vote theft. (Bev Harris of http://www.blackboxvoting.com/ is one who I know slightly from another website.) Some of the findings on the software are very curious, including multiple vote registers, backdoors, wireless access, the ability to change time and date stamps, and practices like leaving vote totals on unsecured FTP sites during the counting process.
I don't know how serious or incriminating these flaws are. It would be valuable to see an evaluation from a nonpartisan expert like yourself. The fact that it has not been a front-page story is not surprising -- it often takes months or years for important stories to break. And this is potentially a very important story.
Jack Neefus
Collage Park, MD
To my surprise, Cringeley replied immediately:
Dear Jack,
I'll be covering it the week after next. It will take me until then
to feel confident I have a handle on the story and can add some value
to the discussion.
All the best,
Bob
And finally, here's my reply to him:
Bob --
Great -- thanks for the quick reply. There are also some people at Johns Hopkins working on the issue.*
I also saw your article on DTMD and CLEC vs. ILEC. Very timely. I work for Verizon and am interviewing with both the fiber-to-the-home and Competitive Intelligence groups. It shed some light on things I wasn't familiar with. Thanks.
Jack Neefus
College Park, MD
*Baltimore Sun article: http://www.sunspot.net/news/yahoo/bal-te.md.vote25jul25,0,3898855.story?coll=bal-newsaol-headlines
Cringeley's a good independent columnist. His opinions will help stir the pot in the tech world, where a lot of this seems to be brewing.