Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a waiver in the Geneva Convention?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:12 AM
Original message
Is there a waiver in the Geneva Convention?
Edited on Fri Jul-25-03 08:23 AM by liberal_veteran
Is there a waiver in the Geneva Convention that allows the US to ignore it for political expedience?

The reason I ask is the photos. Propaganda does not necessarily have to be true or untrue, it is designed for a specific purpose: to have a public relations impact either to demoralize the enemy or help your case. So this most definitely is a propaganda ploy.

Showing pictures of the sons for expediencie's sake, whether true or untrue, would specifically be what the Geneva Convention ban on such activity was created to stop.

Any thoughts? Or am I just way off base here?

Editted for grammar and spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm with ya...
but I'm going to see how things develop...I think that BushCo has shot themselves in the foot this time...

Things should get interesting the next few days/weeks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
junker Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. US is not a signatory so no worries
check it out. much is made of GC but US of A ain't a party to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you being ironic?
Or sarcastic?

Since when is the US not signatory to the Geneva Convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The US is a Signatory of the Conventions
Edited on Fri Jul-25-03 08:35 AM by party_line
but not of the subsequent Protocols

ICRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. It may violate Art. 34 as well-
Edited on Fri Jul-25-03 08:39 AM by party_line
Section III, Article 34 of the 1st Geneva Protocol says:

Art. 34. Remains of deceased

1. The remains of persons who have died for reasons related to occupation or in detention resulting from occupation or hostilities and those or persons not nationals of the country in which they have died as a result of hostilities shall be respected, and the gravesites of all such persons shall be respected, maintained and marked as provided for in Article 130 of the Fourth Convention, where their remains or gravesites would not receive more favourable consideration under the Conventions and this Protocol.

2. As soon as circumstances and the relations between the adverse Parties permit, the High Contracting Parties in whose territories graves and, as the case may be, other locations of the remains of persons who have died as a result of hostilities or during occupation or in detention are situated, shall conclude agreements in order: (a) to facilitate access to the gravesites by relatives of the deceased and by representatives of official graves registration services and to regulate the practical arrangements for such access; (b) to protect and maintain such gravesites permanently; (c) to facilitate the return of the remains of the deceased and of personal effects to the home country upon its request or, unless that country objects, upon the request of the next of kin.

http://www.globalissuesgroup.com/geneva/protocol1.html

edit- but it looks like the US never signed on for this one, as though that would have mattered :-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC