I heard this on a radio replay of one of his recent talks.
1) It's an iron-clad fact that there are business relations between the Bush and bin Laden families.
2) Osama bin Laden is the man behind the most horrible terrorist attack on the United States. Yet the relationship between the Bush and bin Laden families is almost never mentioned in any mainstream news or mainstream political context.
3) Just imagine if following the Oklahoma City bombing it was revealed that there were business relations between the Clinton and McVeigh families. What do you think the GOP/corporate media response would be?
I can't even THINK of what they would have done to Clinton! Look at what they did over a sperm stain on a dress! OMG... It's unimaginable what the freepers would have done. WHY aren't our Dems doing the same thing to the shrub? Michael brings up a point that should be exploited!
The hijackers were Saudis and Egyptians, financed by OBL. Why, again, did we invade Iraq?? Why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia or Egypt? I understand why we went into Afghanistan but why didn't we finish that job??
to care. At least enough don't to make the next 'election' even close. We should be putting the neocons before firing squads for treason, but it is as if we liberals are the traitors.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.