This is from Newsmax. Per DU's rules, I find Newsmax to be one the right's shillest tools.
I don't care too much for Alan Colmes but
some(not all) of his answers in the interview were great, IMO, considering the loaded questions.
Not sure if he is serious in his chapter, "OJ Was Innocent."
On Alan Colmes new book
Red, White & Liberal: How the Left is Right & the Right is WrongNEWSMAX: You say in your book that when it comes to leaving America vulnerable to the 9/11 attacks, "I point a finger directly at those conservatives who were hell bent on destroying Clinton and could think of nothing else. The brazen attempt to disable the president took up the time of Congress, the courts and the media and hobbled the executive branch's ability to focus it's energy on the well-being of the nation."
Does that mean that, for the good of the nation, Bill Clinton should have been allowed to get away with perjury?
COLMES: No, it means for the good of the country, the Constitutional bar for impeachment should have been respected, and the real business and best interests of the country were held hostage to those with an anti-Clinton agenda.
Although I know you can point to some exceptions, almost no prosecutor goes after perjury charges when someone lies about sex. This was not a "high crime". When are you Newsmax folks going to get over Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Last I checked, we have more important and current things to worry about.
NEWSMAX: Do you agree with Gen. Wesley Clark that 9/11 was Bush's fault?
COLMES: No. But I agree with his greater point that his balking at providing information to the Republican former New Jersey governor, Tom Kean
, raises serious questions as to why the administraiton isn't helping the 9/11 commission get to the bottom of what happened. What are they trying to hide?
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/2/124611.shtml