|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:39 PM Original message |
Seattle will go ALL MAIL in BALLOT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Vance is an unspeakable creep. If he doesn't like it, it must be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raysr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. If they don't like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Love it. Paper ballots -- try to get your effing tabulator . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. But how can you be sure that whoever opens the mail....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. How can you ever be sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Too many people to spoof a result convincingly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Good on Seattle! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. Congratulations, Neighbors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. How are they going to count them ballots? ....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oregonjen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Oregon does this and it is quite successful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And fast... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
10. Congratulations! Now for the rest of the state! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't like it either, and i sure ain't a republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Oregon voting participation went up about 25%, IIRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oregonjen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. At least if the ballot gets delivered to their mail box, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Oregon has been vote-by-mail for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I'd been voting absentee for 10 years and I love it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. The ballots should be marked NO POSTAGE NEEDED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. Here in Thurston County we have been doing mail only primaries for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
18. Haha yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnyawl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
20. IT'S NOT SEATTLE THAT'S DOING THIS!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Yes, you're right! I should had said, King County that include Seattle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. Alright! We love this system down in OR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
25. Good - been a WA permanent absentee voter for 10 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. Oregon has done this and its gone quite well according to all my family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazzleDazzle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-22-05 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
27. It's a feint. It's easier -- don't be celebrating all mail-in ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-22-05 07:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Hell of lot better than Diebold. You get the receipt and one can check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-22-05 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. Registered mail or certified would be the way to go,.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC