Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bush Domestic Spy Program Eavesdrop On American Journalists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:04 PM
Original message
Did Bush Domestic Spy Program Eavesdrop On American Journalists?
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 02:19 PM by Mark E. Smith
Americablog.com 12/19

I had an interesting discussion this morning with DC political consultant Marc Laitin. We both came to the conclusion that it sounds like Bush's super-secret illegal domestic spying program may be targeting US journalists and that may be why Bush never got it cleared by the court and is worried about it coming forward now.

Think about it.

1) Bush had the authority to go to the court AFTER THE SURVEILLANCE and RETROACTIVELY get the warrant to do surveillance he'd already done. He didn't. The only reason I can come up with for why Bush would NOT go to the court after the fact is because he thought the court would slap him down. The court's greatest concern would likely be spying on US citizens, and an even greater concern would be spying on either members of Congress or the American media. If Bush were spying on American media, he might just lose his retroactive warrant.

2) Bush says that there were only Americans making phone calls to people with known Al Qaeda ties. That probably knocks out members of Congress, but it very much sounds like US journalists. Who else, other than terror cells, would be talking on a regular basis with people who might have ties to terrorism? American journalists working on stories.

It could even include US journalists talking to their bureaus abroad. Read again who Bush said the program is targeting (if you believe him):

"..intercept the international communications of people with known links to Al-Qaida and related
terrorist organizations."

What's a "known link?" Does a journalist who has contacts onside Al Qaeda have a "known link" to Al Qaeda? Well sure he does, he absolutely has links/contacts with Al Qaeda.

3) Bush says that revealing the details of his spy program would tell Al Qaeda what we were doing and stop the program from being effective. Again, journalists. Al Qaeda already knows we're monitoring phone calls and emails, we've been doing that for eyars. They also know that the Patriot Act lets Bush spy on Americans (with appropriate court orders). So what about the revelation of this domestic spying program could possibly tip off Al Qaeda to something they already know we're doing? There has to be a new wrinkle to the program, something Al Qaeda never thought we'd do. Spy on US journalists.

More at:

http://www.americablog.blogspot.com/2005/12/did-bush-domestic-spy-program.html

Can't wait for the Senate investigations ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you combine this line of thinking with the 'journalists' on the payroll
You can understand how the White House would learn which reporters had such "known links" (it isn't always the one on the article byline)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. One thing per point two
I would guess their definition of people with "known Al Qaeda ties" is probably a lot broader than any sane person's would be. And lord alone knows what they mean by "known links" - hell you make a speech against *'s mess in Iraq you are one with the terrorists in their eyes so there's another description so wide you could drive a truck through it -

If it all comes out - I'm willing to bet that these illegal taps were use to listen in on not only Journalists but domestic and foreign political opponents of the Iraq war, like say Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore and Kerry and Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. I ask whether they were spying on Democrats for the election. I would
not be surprised if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder why people aren't making the OBVIOUS connection?
Domestic Surveillance - WHO was being surveilled, and what did it have to do with the 2004 election?

Wake UP folks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course ...
The HUGE problem with unsupervised, unchecked, unregulated snooping by the government is that it is ALWAYS abused.

Franklin and Jefferson and Washington and the whole founding crew figured this out over 200 years ago -- that's why the Fourth Amendment was written down in permanent ink.

Journalists were undoubtedly wire tapped and, indeed, one can be certain that political opponents of the Bush regime were spied upon. Otherwise, what explains Bush's attack, attack, attack strategy here? He cannot let the list of snoopees names ever come out.

Now is the time for progressives to tell the establishment, inside the beltway, Democrats that the 'impeachment' word must be used!

If we hear Biden or Clinton start making excuses for this criminal behavior on the part of the Idiot-in-Chief, then, well ... we really all might as well give up and accept our fascist fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't the Quakers on that list? ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. And under this corrupt regime
How do you suppose we'll ever know? They're quite good at investigating themselves and concluding that they've done nothing wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just assumed that it targeted pol. opponents and the Kerry campaign
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC