Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ted Rall kicks * in the balls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:40 PM
Original message
Ted Rall kicks * in the balls
I apologize if anyone's balls are offended by my title :D

-snip-

This bizarro Administration does everything bass-ackwards. The recession is hardest on the poor and middle-class, so Bush gives tax cuts to the rich. When an overwhelming invasion force was needed to secure Afghanistan (news - web sites) and Iraq (news - web sites), Rumsfeld sent in a skeleton crew. Now that the citizens of those countries want us to go home, Gen. Tommy Franks has announced that our 148,000-man, $5 billion-a-month occupation army will get bigger and stick around until whenever.

-snip-

Little things hook big fish: tax evasion for Al Capone, a minor stock trade for Martha Stewart (news - web sites), a sexual dalliance for Bill Clinton (news - web sites). So it is with George W. Bush: whether or not the man who conned us into two wars ends up sharing a cage with Khalid Sheikh Mohammad could come down to this line from the 2003 State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

-snip-

Lying about Niger yellowcake pales next to Bush's other evil chicanery: hobbling the U.S. economy with debt, feeding corporate corruption, opening concentration camps for Muslims and bombing thousands of people to death. But those acts are almost too monstrous to comprehend. Americans easily understand the myriad of little lies--the faked Jessica Lynch "rescue," the phony Saddam statue toppling and now the Niger uranium story--and how they add up to the character of a man unworthy of the office he holds.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=127&ncid=742&e=7&u=%2F030716%2F7%2F4pblk.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dand Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. *'s balls need kicking
LMAO, thanks for the great article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hi Catwoman!...
Isn't it nice to know 'dignity was restored to the White House'?


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hi, Rasp!!!!
:hi:

don't forget the honor.

Gots to have the honor, too :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ekaterina Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. whooo hooo
BURN BABY BURN

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSox02 Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We're "United not divided"
Just as * promised during his campaign whenever he couldn't answer a tough question. He's right. He did unite the world agaisnt us. I hated listening to this guy always say "Hey look, I may not know anything, or have any business being President, but I'm a uniter, not a divider. Gosh darn it peopel will like me".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. * has balls? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think that's what the socks he stuck down in his crotch
when he was on the Lincoln was supposed to represent :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. And this
*****snip***

Almost immediately after receiving it from the British, CIA (news - web sites) analysts determined that the Niger info was probably bogus. According to The New York Times, CIA director George Tenet then personally met with Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley--Condi Rice's right-hand man--to make sure Bush didn't mention Niger uranium ore anymore. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency went further, determining that Iraq simply didn't have a nuke program. Based on these facts, "The reference was omitted when Mr. Bush gave speech in Cincinnati on October 7." And it stayed out of Bush's talks until it suddenly popped up in the State of the Union--despite more CIA warnings. Even then, Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) refused to use it in his presentation to the UN a week later. "It was not standing the test of time," said a squeamish Powell.


Behold Slaughtergate's smoking gun: Not only had the CIA had told the White House about the Niger forgery in October 2002, the White House had gotten the message. Nonetheless Bush, after months of excising that argument from his speeches, revived it in January 2003 for use in what is traditionally the most widely watched TV appearance a president makes each year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC