Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC Live Poll: Was President Bush Right To Authorize NSA ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:11 AM
Original message
MSNBC Live Poll: Was President Bush Right To Authorize NSA ...
... eavesdropping on Americans?

24%: Yes, it was essential for national security.
71%: No, it's unconstitutional.
04%: I'm not sure.
01%: I don't care.

59,073 responses.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10491945
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. No; it's unconstitutional 71%----* 59533 responses



Was President Bush right to authorize NSA eavesdropping on Americans? * 59533 responses
Yes; it was essential for national security
24%
No; it's unconstitutional 71%
I'm not sure
4%
I don't care
1%
Not a scientifically valid survey. Click to learn more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Done!
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 08:16 AM by Cobalt Violet
It's amazing 29% don't have a clue about the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That 29% are called Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. And how many repukes do you think were spied on?
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 08:27 AM by Feeney2
Open season on the Left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I'd call them fascists
I don't know where the real republicans are but they aren't in DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. I swear some people would support Bush even
If he peed in their corn flakes.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. He violated the consitution, THIS is impeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodcutter Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Anyone
who would give up their rights in the name of freedom and protection deserves neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. done and kick and recommended --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. 1% don't care. What do you suppose they do care about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Survivor, Apprentice?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MANative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Done and
now up to 86% no with 14% yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. 60130 responses, percentage the same
* 60130 responses that's a significant number


24% Yes; it was essential for national security


71% No; it's unconstitutional


4% I'm not sure


1% I don't care

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sure all of us are on the list of being "watched"
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. CNN had this piece on it last night, I saw
Talking about how they will only use it to keep America safe from terrorists.

Although, its nice how the definition of a word like terrorist can change.

Right-wing extremist who blows up government buildings with the expressed purpose of undermining the government and killing innocent people?

Not a terrorist.

Political opponent of a Republican president or presidential candidate:

Terrorist?

Maybe someday soon...

After all, look at how outraged they got at Kerry and the Democrats in 2004 for trying to "unseat the president during wartime"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. Problem is that the "gubmint" is our "employee(s)". We can and
will fire this batch of unconstitutional employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Not until........
the make-up of Congress is changed. A Republican majority guarantees bush won't be impeached, that's why the '06 elections are so important. If the country LASTS until then, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. That such a question is even asked in a so called "free" country
is very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. Done
A fundy called C-spn this morning and thought it would be OK. If you were doing nothing wrong, then what do you have to worry about. I immediately thought of dubby's relationship with God. If you don't sin, then you don't have to worry about the wrath of God. All praise to dubby the prime overseer for the Lord.
O8)
Sorry God, I know that you don't want to be smeared with this fool- forgive me.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Done
Was President Bush right to authorize NSA eavesdropping on Americans? * 63265 responses
Yes; it was essential for national security
24%
No; it's unconstitutional
71%
I'm not sure
4%
I don't care
1%

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10491945
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
22. Open and shut impeachment case here, Hill people.
Was President Bush right to authorize NSA eavesdropping on Americans? * 64325 responses


Yes; it was essential for national security
25%

No; it's unconstitutional
70%

I'm not sure
4%

I don't care
1%

Not a scientifically valid survey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Completed
5% either don't care or are not sure? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncle ray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. i say if/when "we" ge back in power
we have the NSA open files on the 24% or so of the country that feels it's A-ok. after all, they have nothing to hide. especially the freeptards that feel so strongly that this is ok that they are undoubtedly freeping it.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Where is the "Hell, no!" option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. MSNBC is also asking for e-mails :p
Was President Bush right to authorize NSA eavesdropping on Americans? * 75537 responses


Yes; it was essential for national security................25%

No; it's unconstitutional..................................70%

I'm not sure................................................4%

I don't care................................................1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC