|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:21 AM Original message |
So Bush PERSONALLY Approved Spying On U.S. Citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
complain jane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. I just saw this on MSNBC.com too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. I can't fathom it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carla in Ca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. That is my next question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty48197 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yup. The buck stops on GWB's desk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. I spoke to my 78 yr old dad this pm. He said the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's definitely an impeachable offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FutureChild (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
5. XXX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
6. The rat bastard needs to be held accountable for this bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DELUSIONAL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
7. Who were the "legal" nit wits who approved this?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 04:21 AM Response to Reply #7 |
27. Apparentely John Yoo, author of previous legal docs about enemy combatants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. That directly goes against his oath of office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carla in Ca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
20. What can we do? Is it DU Activist Corp. time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Whatever we can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
9. A disturbing relevance with the PATRIOT act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
10. Even the Republicans, are outraged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmatthan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. It may be only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #14 |
23. it may include that, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:07 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Lisa Murkowski, Alaska's republican senator, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. This is Bush doing what he does best..............bullshit ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. W is arrogant beyond belief. He spies on us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Beg your pardon, Mr. Bush? Care to explain THAT one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
15. This is in absolute abomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
16. Hey! Anyone that's not "with him" is the ENEMY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
18. What part of the Fouth Amendment does this fucker not understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 04:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Every American should read & re-read the 4th amendment! Then they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 10:26 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. agreed - and to say nothing of his violation of oath of office as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Gunslinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
21. unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
22. I hope Patrick Fitzgerald is careful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
24. "If a dress has no stain, you can't complain" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-17-05 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
29. You are assuming, of course, that he actually reads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC