Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain & Feingold Move to Tighten Lobbying Laws. Why? Abramoff!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:21 AM
Original message
McCain & Feingold Move to Tighten Lobbying Laws. Why? Abramoff!
McCain Moves to Tighten Lobbying Laws as Abramoff Probe Spreads

By Jonathan D. Salant
Dec. 15 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Senators John McCain and Russell Feingold, who led the drive to ban unlimited corporate and union donations to political parties, will make the first bipartisan effort in a decade to strengthen lobbying laws. Their legislation comes as a scandal threatens to ensnare some colleagues.

The lawmakers will introduce a measure as early as today that would require lobbyists to disclose through quarterly electronic reports all the contributions they make, the fund- raisers they arrange and the amount they spend on behalf of candidates and political parties, according to a person who has seen a draft. The legislation would require disclosure of all grass-roots activities and double to two years the waiting period before a lawmaker-turned-lobbyist could lobby a former colleague.

McCain, an Arizona Republican, said he was spurred to act after hearings by his Indian Affairs Committee showed that lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his partner, Michael Scanlon, had charged Indian clients more than $80 million and directed the tribes to donate money to politicians and pet projects.

``It's obvious why it's needed,'' McCain told reporters at the Capitol yesterday. ``One word: Abramoff.''
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aksXlUVzzdfQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's such a wasted effort and creates even more corruption.
No matter what the crime, no matter what the authorities do, the crooks will always move on and figure out a different way to stay one step ahead of the law. People get rich by telling people what they can or can't do, finding different loopholes or give out bribes so they look the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. your right, i mean, why even live anymore... why bother, it sucks anyway
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 11:41 AM by jsamuel
:sarcasm:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And what comes next?
Instead of another group of swift boat veterans we'll start seeing more groups of ex-football teammates, boyscout troops, old school teachers, etc. to accept contributions for smear campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. If McCain really hated corruption, he'd back the Kerry-Wellstone public
financing of campaigns bill.

But, NOOOOOOO.......... instead of REAL REFORM, McCain had to muck around and offer his compromise bill which does practically NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC