From Sirotablog: "I have high hopes for Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), and not just because he gave one good convention speech at the Democratic National Convention. As a civil rights lawyer who represented a working class urban district in the Illinois state legislature, Obama has all the trappings of a leader who could break conventions and be a serious voice for progressives on the national stage. Unfortunately, his first six months in office have given progressives a reason to be worried that he will be just another cog in the Establishment's machine, throwing his significant political capital behind some of the worst initiatives to move through Congress.
Despite his anti-war positions as a candidate in 2004, Obama's second vote as a U.S. Senator was in support of confirming Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State. He also voted to confirm John Negroponte as Director of National Intelligence, despite Negroponte's involvement in Iran-Contra and other situations that clearly raise questions about his ethics and discretion. Obama also voted for a bill to limit citizens rights to seek legal redress against abusive corporations. During the bankruptcy debate, he helped vote down a Democratic amendment to cap the abusive interest rates credit card companies could charge. And now, Obama cast a key procedural vote in support of President Bush's right-wing judges.
Sure, sure - some other Democrats have cast some of these votes as well. Doesn't that mean I'm just picking on him? No, of course not. Obama was supposed to be different - he was supposed to be a real progressive champion. Isn't that why so many liberals/progressives are so excited about him?
Speculation about why Obama has cast these votes centers around the typical posturing that has created the soulless image of the Democratic Party for the last few years - namely, that he's just opportunistically angling for higher office. One political scientist said "I think he’s moving to the center to position himself to perhaps run for president in 2012." Another said Obama "does not want to be seen as a maverick." If this speculation is really true, it's just another sad commentary on the state of the Democratic Party today. Did John McCain teach Democrats nothing about the potential appeal of a "maverick?" Do polling numbers teach Democrats anything about what the "center" really is? Do the Democrats not understand that their biggest challenge is convincing the public they stand for something more than just political calculation/aspiration?"
http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/05/whats-happened-to-barack-obama.htmlVoting Record:
http://bolson.org/gov/us/senate/2005/Obama.html