Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About Novak saying Bush knew who leaked.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:06 PM
Original message
About Novak saying Bush knew who leaked.
I had a thought. If Novak is telling the press that Bush knows, he certainly told Fitzgerald that same thing. Maybe Fitz has a bit more than the pundits realize.
If Bush told Fitz he had no idea who leaked, then he has a charge of making false statements. How would he handle this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll give him a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. lying to a federal prosecutor?
I think from the very beginning they all knew that Rove did it, just a case of nailing him. Besides if Bush knew then this is a serious charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've realized today Fitz is a lot like Columbo
I don't know how many Columbo fans we have on DU, but it was truly a groundbreaking mystery show. For starters, it was 90 minutes long, and the first 30 minutes you got to see the crime itself so you always knew who the killer was. Then Columbo would come along and begin sharing bits of the investigation with the killer, who would invariably offer some kind of explanation, and Columbo always acted like he wasn't completely on the ball (and the trademark "just one more question, sir" that would force the killer to change a story ever so slightly).

Finally at the end Columbo had the killer dead to rights and started explaining how he figured it out, and you realized that he had everything figured out within 5 minutes of showing up, and all the rest was an act to draw out the killer and box him in and make the case airtight.

I think Fitz probably had all he needed to indict someone last spring, and everything that's been going on since then has just been letting everyone hang themselves.

BTW, true Columbo afficionados usually refer to episodes (at least the classic ones) by the name of the celebrity killer. For those in the know, my favorite episode is the one with Donald Pleasence, but the most elegant deduction I recall was one where Columbo measured the total volume of a bunch of books, determined that all the books could never have fit in the boxes labeled "books," and blew the killer's alibi out of the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC