Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOW Russ is up (C-SPAN 2)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:16 PM
Original message
NOW Russ is up (C-SPAN 2)
Talking about the Fourth Amendment and how notice of warrants is essential to the security of home and person from unreasonable search and seizure. I'm learning a lot.

If you comment I will edit with updates/good quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please do.....
.....no TV here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Saying sneak n peek is not needed for terrorism investigation
and is mostly used in drugs. Also says the senate compromise is insufficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oops. My post below. Almost word for word. Oh well....
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sunsets & reports are good but "only get us so far."
"Sunsetting bad law for another four years is not good enough."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sneak and Peak provision is not needed for terrorism. (It's civil)
It's a civil provision. It's primarily for drug prosecution.

This is big! At least I think so.

For those search warrants that need to be secret, there is a FICA (sp?) warrant that can be used for terrorist searches.





Feingold rules!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. thanks, please help me update
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Trust in government cannot be assumed. It must be earned."
"And this government has not earned it. It has resisted oversight & civil liberties every step of the way."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. "The people will not settle for half a loaf."
"They will not accept that we decided to wait another 4 years before addressing their concerns."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh pooh, he's done.
I hope he comes back tomorrow and I hope I'm there to listen. He's awesome. Very presidential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I like him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He revealed the unamerican context of this bill.
This bill strikes at the very heart of what America is founded on. And I think it reveals the nature of the evil and dark creatures who are running this country (into the ground).

And it's a needless bill. They can achieve everything they need to keep Americans secure without it. It is a dangerous bill. And an unconstitutional bill.



Feingold has my vote for a nominee, if and when he runs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC