Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration objects to media describing Alito as conservative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:30 PM
Original message
Bush administration objects to media describing Alito as conservative
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 09:35 PM by shance
Quick!! Somebody hide the truth!!


Excerpts:

The Bush administration is mounting an aggressive effort to counter a Knight Ridder story that described Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito as a committed judicial conservative.

The attack came after Senate Democrats circulated Knight Ridder's assessment of Alito's judicial record for possible use against him at his confirmation hearings next month.

(snip)

The reporters also concluded that Alito "rarely supports individual rights," shows "a strong deference to police authority" and is extremely skeptical about claims of racial discrimination. Henderson covers the Supreme Court for Knight Ridder. Mintz, a reporter for the San Jose Mercury News, a Knight Ridder paper, worked on the Alito project during a stint in Washington.

(snip)

Administration officials scrambled last week to counter speculation that Alito would seek to ban abortions after the release of a 1985 memo he wrote in which he outlined a long-term strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that made abortions legal nationwide.

The White House and other Alito allies also downplayed the significance of a letter that Alito wrote later in 1985 expressing the opinion that "the Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion." At the time, Alito was seeking a promotion in the anti-abortion Reagan administration.


http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/politics/13343330.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. So do I. He's a fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!*
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yep
If the shoe fits! They're probably trying to pass him off as a religious moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the Bush Administration is so averse to nominating a conservative...
then why don't they just nominate someone that is clearly and openly Liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The fundies and Harriet Miers
Bush wouldn't get his judge any other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. They can't have it both ways.
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 09:45 PM by ocelot
They've been selling him to their wack job base by emphasizing his conservative credentials, but they're afraid normal people will figure out that he's farther to the right than Darth Vader. So let's not call him conservative. Instead the Bushies will pretend he respects the Constitution and the rule of law, and meanwhile they'll use their various code words to suck up to their base.

BTW, does anyone else find it at all ironic that "al Qaeda" is Arabic for "the base"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe they would happier with "Wirehanger" Sam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Then we should call him what he is, a Taliban mullah.n/t
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 09:45 PM by Cleita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is exactly what I was going to post.
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 09:53 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Great minds--. It's always a toss up between tough shit and boofuckinghoo
for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. he is a moderate
with X-treme conservative views
what is so hard to understand?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. "moderate" like Mussolini is decribed?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why is Bush Ashamed of Conservatism ?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, truth takes a back seat to sneaking Alito in under the radar.
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 09:59 PM by shance
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. They're supposed to be PROUD of that adjective
it's about damn time that became an epithet,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC