Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Hardball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:13 PM
Original message
So Hardball
has Andrea Mitchell on and she "reports" that Bush* and the rest of the administration KNEW that Al Libbi's testimony was bogus BEFORE THE WAR and Bush* reated the lies anyway....and...Colin Powell repeated the SAME LIES in front of the UN....

what other proof do we need?

Do we have to beat people over the head with a 2x4 to get them to listen?

I'm supposed to be cooking but I couldn't resist posting this...

I
am
so
f-ing
mad
I
could
SPIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stephen Hayes is saying that they never said that Iraq and 911
were connected.... in fact, shrub stated that they were not... ONCE, ONCE, he said that on television ONCE, not twice not 200 times like he linked Saddam and 911 together in the same sentence, or was it 300 times, or 400 times... I lost count. Mad just doesn't cover it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is he a filthy liar, or what? I saw that segment, and I couldn't believe
that both Henry and Tweety actually had the temerity to dispute what that puker said.

I see him on the tube several times a week, and he ALWAYS gets away with his lies

he has a personal investment in the Atta story, btw.

he wrote a book, and articles, for the Weekly Standard directly tying ALQaida to Saddam

THEN, at the end of the segment, when he was asked if Cheney corrected himself about the famous Atta/Czech meeting, he conveniently FORGOT whether or not he did, after demonstating Rovelike, intimate knowledge of dates and bylines of NYT stories that supported his POV

what a complete, utter lying tool that guy is

if only they had somebody better versed in the details of this story than tweety or Henry.....

still, this was pretty good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He is a filthy liar...
And Tweety usually lets him get away with it, but not tonight. I despise that guy. And the sad thing is, so many of them are just poor liars, too. You can tell they are lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then spit for goodness sake
just aim it that way :-)

we all should
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is Hayes even interviewed?
Doesn't it suck to sit back and watch this bullshit knowing that so much of it is lies and distortions. Especially when knowing more than the supposed "experts" like Hayes, Mitchell and Tweety. Makes me want to puke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. excellent question...he has less than zero cred. check this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC