|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Pam-Moby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:23 PM Original message |
A neighbor told me the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. They tried that last year I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. just read the constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Could Bush declare a state of emergency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. No precident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. thank god for that, I do look for some major hokey pokey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I have read the constitution but since when do these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. yes, that is what I felt about the constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. It would take a constitutional amendment to change presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagine My Surprise (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Is the rule that you cannot run after 8 consecutive years or 8 years total |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. the 22nd amendment spells it out pretty clearly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. But, but, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. No. You can be elected twice, but if you finish more than two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. No way....there'd be a bloody coup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Would there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. If usurpation of the office doesn't trigger revolt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth_First (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I would hope you are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagine My Surprise (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Are there days that you don't feel, well...you know...fresh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. revolt? not as long as Walmart and Mc Donalds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. I thought they would when they stole it in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nope. Will never believe that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 06:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
38. Anyone who misunderestimates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. well - if they do manage to shove an amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. Bring on the amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
20. I doubt that B*sh would want another term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagine My Surprise (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. what makes you think he hasn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. he doesn't care a fig about that, it's just party, party, party to him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A Simple Game (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Yes, the only reason he has lasted this long is because he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 05:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I believe you are right, he doesn't even have to watch TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
22. "He would kick B*shes ass up and down the sidewalk" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. You have a good point. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. What's the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adriennui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
26. it will never happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. He may want that to happen, he loves war & profit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Not to mention his corporate criminals in crime... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 06:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. I never thought I would see Americans in tents while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
35. Two years ago I thought they could do this, but since the Dimson's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Me thinks you've been dringing too much nog! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
37. I don't think even the Repugs like Bush that much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-09-05 06:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Daivid Brooks was gushing about Conde tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC