Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calling adult females "girls"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:25 AM
Original message
Calling adult females "girls"
is one of my pet peeves. It's the equivalent of referring to black adult males as "boys."

Do people who speak languages other than English do this sort of thing?

Any Brits, Aussies, Canadians out there, do people do this in your country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sheilas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Ah yes...
Sheila... the female version of Paddy. These two slang words were used a lot in the older generations of my Irish family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. I thought Sheila was the Aussie distaff of Bruce.
My ancestory is Irish and I've never heard it used there(?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #32
59. Well, since Australia eventually...
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 10:54 AM by catabryna
became the penal colony for Ireland (actually, only parts of Australia); it makes sense that they would use the same word and with the passage of time, I could see how its usage might have changed. How it ended up being used to describe someone other than a woman is beyond me. Sheila is an old gaelic term that was typically used to describe a female principle.

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
265. Well we weren't the penal colony for Ireland...
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 08:27 PM by foreigncorrespondent
...even though we had a lot of Irish convicts. We were actually the penal colony of the British.

On edit: typo!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #265
272. I do realize that...
and should have made that point. The Brit's penal colony before Australia was the good ole' US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
234. "What? Name's not Bruce? That's going to take some explaining."
No Pooftas.

(With apologies to Monte Python)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
175. Sheilas
are the Cheyennes, depending on if you are speaking a woodland/lakes language, or have moved out on the Great Plains. Or, if you are speaking English, you could just say "Blue Clouds." Be prepared to fight off all those who take great insult in being called Blue Clouds, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
258. Oy!
Whatever you do, don't call my other half a sheila! I think the connotation is kinda common/slutty/skaggy, but don't quote me.

I'll see if I can find foreigncorrespondent and ask her to explain why I'm forbidden to use the word sheila. LOL

As for the OP: Fine by me, as long as it's another "girl" calling me a "girl." From a guy, it sounds condescending, unless he's using the phrase "boys and girls" for "men and women."

I use "boys and girls" all the time when addressing DU ("Yes, boys and girls, there are conservatives in California...") but it doesn't have anything to do with age or sex -- I'm just being my adorably ironic self.

The thing that drives me insane is the phrase "men and girls."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #258
264. I don't like it...
...for me it is down grading to be called a sheila. If I want to be called that I will change my name.

It is old slang used by the more "common" folk (mostly men) of the day to call ALL women. Unfortunately it has stuck, with many of today's women being really offended by it. My mum on the other hand uses it all the time, and isn't offended by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #258
267. Exactly!
Keep the parallelisms straight.

Husband and wife, or man and woman. NOT man and wife.

Ladies and gentlemen, or men and women. NOT Ladies' Room and Mens' Room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #267
278. THANK YOU! 'Ladies' associate with 'gentlemen'...
Advertisers' use of "Men's and Ladies' watches" drives me INSANE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #267
287. It aggravates me when women's sports teams are referred to as
'lady'something or other, eg., 'Lady Gators are in the finals.' We don't hear of the exploits of any 'Gentleman Gators.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. The women I know use the term as least as often as the men.
We also call groups of men "the boys" regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Using it in that sort of context is one thing,
saying "going out with the boys/the girls," "boys'/girls' night out", etc. I personally have no problem with that.

I'm talking about a different usage. For example,

"I know this girl who..." (This "girl" is WAY older than 18.)

"That girl in the office said..." (That "girl" is 50+).

In the first set of examples, most people would use "boys" or "girls"; in the second, most people wouldn't use "boy," they'd say "man."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:40 AM
Original message
Actually, in my experience, men are referred to singly as a "guy".
Hardly ever as a man.

Hey, my name isn't "Guy"! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
26. And, to add to that...
most of the time, I hear us women referred to as "the gals" or "the ladies". I don't recall ever hearing a man refer to women using the term "girls". Maybe I'm lucky.

I almost universally use the term "guy" or "guys" instead of men. But, boys... that is reserved for males under 16 in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
197. the whole of society seems to be longing to stay
juvenile and more familiar. I've heard women of a certain age(60+)use girls to refer to each other. Seems even to have supplanted the older term "gals". My wife doesn't like much informal speech, so I have to watch it....she also gets pissed when people refer to her as "hun" or honey...women and men alike. I generally go with the "whatever floats your boat" philosophy....and me, I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I prefer the asexual "you guys"
And I don't hold the door open for anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Not holding the door is just rude. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
88. Holding the door open is chauvenistic.
It's implying that the woman is physically unable to open her own door.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. Chauvinistic my ass!
It's simply a respectful gesture. Manners. Try it some time.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #90
110. I agree
However, I do have a bit of fun when I try to hold the door open for a man. Now, most men under 50 accept my gesture and say thanks. But if I try it with a man over 50, well, I've had some literally tussle with me for the right to hold the door. Hardwired I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #110
122. Well, I'm over 50 and I'd be grateful ...
... after I awoke from a dead faint. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #122
126. LOL
I gotta say, it's kind o fun. I usually win when I say: "Let ME be the Gentleman this time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #110
154. In Russia, it's the opposite.
Older men will accept a subway seat from a young woman. They fought in the Great Patriotic War and they figure they've earned it. And they have!

It's a whole different thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #110
223. Maybe a definition is in order
by "hold the door" I generally mean holding it in the open position long enough for the person behind you to restrain it instead of allowing it to swing shut in his/her face.

What it sounds like you are describing is something I usually reserve for my party (when entering a restaurant for instance) - hold the door in the open position so that people can pass by me.

In the latter case, I'd offer ("tussle" is too strong a word. Perhaps there's something about you that motivates 50+ guys to want to. :loveya: ) to take the place of the person holding the door too - and I'm not quite 50. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #90
121. I think RagingInMiami was just kidding there dbaker41
If you note, after RagingInMiami's comments he has a DOUBLE sarcasm icon :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #90
123. The previous post was sarcasm
but I experienced that when I was a college student. If I had the temerity to hold a door open for a woman I would receive a dirty look just as often as I would receive a thank you. There really are women out there who get offended if you do something as simple as hold a door open for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #123
128. As a woman, I DON'T understand those women who get offended, I mean
The women that get offended, WHATS their problem eh? What could POSSIBLY be offensive about a man holding the door open for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #128
147. I don't get that either.
Now, when a man holds the door open and expects me to 1) Squeeze past him, or 2) Walk under his armpit, I hesitate.

Everyone should hold the door for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #128
148. As RiM said...
it implies that I, as a dominant male of the species, feel the need to hold open the door because she is incapable of doing it herself. It's a metaphor for later in life: Men have to take care of women because they aren't able to do it themselves.

It's completely absurd, IMO. I was raised primarily by my mother and grandmother - and have an incredibly liberal older sister - and would never consider NOT holding the door open for a woman, whether it is a car door or the entrance to a building. Sadly, rather than the polite young man my grandmother praised for my thoughtfulness, many women see a chauvinist pig for demeaning my feeble female counterparts.

Life's a real bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #148
179. I'm glad that you're a polite young man :)
And well done for not listening to these silly women in society who for some BIZARRE reason feel offended by having the door held open.

As I pointed out before, I hold the door open for men and I've held the door open for other women. It's all down to being polite and well-mannered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #179
268. So, everybody hold doors open for everybody else
Depends on who gets there first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #148
231. It's getting to the point where you can't do anything nice for anyone
without offending someone!


Quite frankly, all this being offended by crap around here is really beginning to offend me!

:p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #231
263. Can't even say "happy holidays"
without being accused of stealing Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #90
127. I hold the door open for men and women alike,
as I would hope that they would do so for me, if they entered a building before me. It's respectful. Nothing to do with Chauvinism. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #127
184. Same here.
And when someone holds the door open for me, I thank them.

I hold the door for both men & women.

I also say "the girls," "the guys" & "you guys" when referring to friends.

Nothing disrespectful there. If someone has a big problem with any of that, they have some issues they need to work out, IMO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #90
139. Courtesy is asexual.
If one were to hold the door because the next person is a woman, then the act could be called chauvinisitic.

But if one holds a door open as a simple gesture of courtesy, then the only chauvinism (or "power struggle," as some critics might frame it) is in the perception of the critic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #90
186. I hold the door open for men if they're close behind.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #90
218. It's good manners, and so is thanking a person for doing it for you
When I walk through a door, if someone (male or female) is less than 3 or 4 steps behind me, I'll hold the door.

There is only one kind of person who will almost never say "thanks" - Women and girls aged 13 to 45.

It's become a running joke between my wife and I.

In my experience, even tatooed, pierced, dyed, leather-clad skater punks have a better track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrhopeforwes Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #88
99. you just proved dave chappelle's point about chivalry being dead...
...and women killed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #88
114. Yeah, and who said anything about holding it for women?
I hold it for everyone. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #114
119. same with me
I always hold it open if the person behind me is reasonably close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #119
124. Yep. I'm compulsive about checking behind me ...
... and extending that courtesy -- and notice that the majority of males are similarly habituated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #114
120. If I had a nickel for every time a woman ever held the door for me ...
... I might be able to buy a cup of coffee. :eyes: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #120
145. Follow me, and the door will be held for you.
Can I have my nickel now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #114
235. Same here. Young, old, man, woman, whoever
I always hold doors open, and I'm a 32 yr old woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. Women can be 'guys' in plural form.
Some southern women prefer 'gals' which I find grating.

You should hold the door open for everyone following you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
87. "You guys" is just awful.
It's an attempt at a second-person plural, and it barely works in a both-gender way (if the setting is very informal,) but is really lame when women use it with other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #87
111. Ah, but some women will assume that you are not talking to them but
to a couple of their appendages, especially if that's where your eyes happen to be looking at the time.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #87
113. In the north, women use it as the plural all the time.
It sounds 'normal' to me.

'Gals' makes my skin crawl. But neither is more correct or appropriate than the other. It's purely preference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #113
125. In the South, people use the term girls and honey and Darlin'
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 12:36 PM by ...of J.Temperance
And thats how we do it...and nobody has ever thought it's inappropriate.

I've also used the term Darlin'...in fact I've responded to people on these here boards using the term Darlin'...so I have.

On Edit: Spelling error.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #125
131. And blacks will call you 'baby'. It's kind of neat.
They're friendly.

But you still have to be careful in the workplace. Remember when that idiot in Mitch McConnell's office tried to have the cafeteria employee fired for calling him 'baby'? Stupid.

Feel free to call me 'Darlin' any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #131
141. I like the term baby, it's sweet
My Grandmother who's a white woman, she calls people "baby" though too...Grandma also calls Junior "that Motherfucker"...she'll often say "Get that Motherfucker off mah TV"...and "You know what that Motherfucker's doing now?" She's so rad and cute.

Sure, I'll call you Darlin' :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #113
237. As a native Michigander, I can confirm that.
In fact, I never even noticed I said the generic "you guys" until I moved to Kentucky and was ribbed for it a little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #87
162. I'm pretty sure this is a generational thing
I'm a woman and I do it all the time, and so do all the women I hang out with...we're all in our 20s, if that means anything. I've never really heard anyone over 40 use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #87
190. But it's not nearly as bad as "Youse Guys"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #87
226. I have a New Jersey friend...
Who had great sport at Washingtonian colloquial fondess for the term "you guys".

He got particularly amused at the second-person plural possessive i.e. "You guys's"

We eventually replaced it with the phrase "y'all's" for his benefit.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
116. I LIKE having the door held open, and I ALSO hold the door open for men
I don't go in for all of this horsecrap about not having the door held open. So you see, there ARE women who like a man to hold the door open, because I'm one of them.

I ACTUALLY think that it's INCREDIBLY bad-mannered NOT to hold the door open for someone. I think it's very gentlemanly to have the door held open for me.

AND I might add, that when I hold the door open for men, 99% of those men have always smiled and said "Thanks"...oh and 1% of that 99% we ended up going out together...although he's now ex-boyfriend number 4...but he's still a good fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #116
133. You just keep openin' doors darlin'. I do the same.
It never hurts to do the polite thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #133
144. Yep, and you know, it costs nothing to be polite and courteous
That it doesn't Darlin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
130. I prefer the asexual "fellows" ...
... which I believe is far less gender-oriented. Strangely, however, that's not how people are trained.

fel·low n.
1. a. A man or boy.
b. Informal. A boyfriend.
2. A comrade or associate.
3. a. A person of equal rank, position, or background; a peer.
b. One of a pair; a mate: found the lost shoe and its fellow.
4. A member of a learned society.
5. A graduate student appointed to a position granting financial aid and providing for further study.
6. Chiefly British.
a. An incorporated senior member of certain colleges and universities.
b. A member of the governing body of certain colleges and universities.

7. Obsolete. A person of a lower social class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. In social situations, among friends, it's perfectly OK.
And I don't mind being referred to as "one of the boys", even though I'm middle-aged.

But at work, among people you don't know that well or in formal situations, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
63. Well said.
"But at work, among people you don't know that well or in formal situations, no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Women who get giddy and encourage it annoy me even more.
It's most grating when it's a young male referring to women old enough to be his mother or grandmother. I suppose it is the easy way to assert his male dominance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. My pet-peeve from guys my age
"dear" :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
215. I HATE it when grownups say. "Goin' to the Little Boys/Girls Room"
instead of bathroom :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. here in CR, they are chicas, ticas and guapas.....
....but rarely mujeres.

older women are usually referred to as senoras.

a lot of guapas here. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. I as a female will call a
group of women I may know, "lets go girls", or use the word in that way in gest/fun in conversation.

Call my boys, "men" too, ie: "lets go men, hurry up, we're late" etc..
My sister-in-law would call her "girls", "ladies" in the same way when they were little..it was sooo cute "come-on ladies lets go"

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
137. Keep doing it! They're your 'girls'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. A woman in my office calls out "good night, boys" every night n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Relax
I call women "girls" all the time, as I call men "boys" all the time.

It's meaningless, really. It strikes me as a charming, albeit antedeluvian, holdover from the days when feminism took off, back in the sixties and seventies, and it suddenly became a bad thing to use such appellations. I like to think we've gotten more comfortable with such things by now.

When a female insists on being referred to as a "woman" when someone's used the term "girl" in her presence, that's a pretty good giveaway for me that she's got some rigid and insecure thinking that's not going to be fun for me to deal with, so I go around her. So far, it's worked out well for me.

Helen Reddy's song, "I Am Woman," was probably one of the most destructive influences in the whole movement, and I live my life hoping I'll never hear that inane piece of music again.

Girls, boys - we're all in this together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. See my post #11.
"When a female insists on being referred to as a "woman" when someone's used the term "girl" in her presence, that's a pretty good giveaway for me that she's got some rigid and insecure thinking that's not going to be fun for me to deal with"

That's rather rigid thinking on your part, it seems.

Remember how in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, the prosecuting attorney kept referring to Tom Robinson as "boy?" and in RL, people used to refer to adult black males as "boy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
72. I saw your post
It would seem that you have your own set of rules, just as I do, for living life.

That's not what I'd call "rigid thinking," but, rather, how you are, given your experience in this world.

As an old girl lawyer who fought battles that youngsters today would not believe, I really don't take issue with little things. Life's far too interesting to get caught up in what I regard as meaningless nominal linguistic battles that don't ever resolve a thing.

Words - they have as much power as we choose to give them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. At work?
Do you expect your subordinates to refer to you as "sir?"

Perhaps you should ask some of your employees -- anonymously -- if they find being called boy or girl "charming."

I was raised to address others politely; generally sir or ma'am suffices for most situations. More casual appellations are appropriate with friends, of course. As a college instructor, I address my students with sir or ma'am -- collectively they become "class" or "folks." Most are younger than my child, but I would never presume to refer to them like children.

You may be a lawyer, sir, but your attitude is just plain rude. Calling it charming doesn't cut it for anyone but yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
74. I most certainly do
In fact, I demand that they refer to me as "sir."

That is, of course, when I am not demanding that they address me as "Your Most Exalted And Worshipped Highness."

Or, in the alternative, I let them call me by my given name, since I own the firm and they work for me.

I may be a lawyer, honey, but I'm also a girl. And a woman. And a mother. And a grandmother.

You need to expand your thinking. Girls can be lawyers now, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #74
93. Oooooooooh, SNAP!
Nice zinger there, O.L.L.! Funny how the poster just assumed your gender from your profession.

Bake, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #93
100. Given the context,
it was exceptionally wonderful.

SNAP! indeed...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #100
207. You know what though?
Old Leftie Lawyer,

I've read many of your posts and, of course, am aware of your gender. However, I think it understandable that someone could assume you to be male not because of your profession, but because of the attitude conveyed in your argument. Pretty much anyone who hasn't lived under a rock for the past few decades realizes that there are many, many, women lawyers. That's hard to miss considering that 50% (I believe) of law school graduates are female at this point. But I can see a poster such as the one you admonished picturing a cigar-chomping, old school, Boss Hogg type of guy from your rather dismissive and patronizing defense of calling adults "girls" and "boys". Sorry, but that reminds me of every jerkoff male chauvinist I've had the misfortune of working for in my life.

That's not to say I don't agree with you to a certain extent. I don't get too bothered by someone calling me a girl in most cases. I also view it in the context in which it is said. The last time I got pissed off about it was at the gym two years ago when this obnoxious middle aged guy grabbed a piece of equipment I was using without even asking if he could work in with me. When I rebuked him for it he said "Listen, girl...." That's all I remember him saying due to the red hot rage that clouded my vision and the stream of profanities that came out of my mouth. Needless to say, that asshole still gives me a wide berth at the gym. Other than that, I don't really care because I concur with you that there are bigger feminist fish to fry and also because I want to get along with most people.

Also, I TOTALLY hate that Helen Reddy song too! It's like nails on a chalkboard. I think it and "She's Having My Baby" by Paul Anka are vying for the title of most putrid piece of musical excrement to appear on the pop music charts.

Those are just some thoughts I had.

Respectfully, ccbombs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #207
214. You know what?
I think you're right.

The truth is that I've always been 'way out there in terms of not giving a fig for convention, and that's made life interesting, sometimes difficult, always rewarding. I think the best line I heard was at my 25th high school reunion when a boy (ahem!) who'd been my best boy buddy through 12 years of school told me that he'd always thought that I was 20 years ahead of everyone else.

I do think people react a lot to the tone, yes, and that's kind of too bad. Let's hope that I won't seem such a guy broad in years to come, when the younger generation can find their own voices.

Yeah, you do go white- or red-hot blind with anger in the kind of situation you described. I will tell you a story now, about something like that:

I was a slightly experienced young lawyer, newly hired by a fat old white boys' law firm on K Street, NW in Washington as assistant general counsel for a large corporation. I used only my first two initials and my married surname on my letterhead and business cards. Deliberately.

There was a meeting called of all the people in the industry in town who had the same job as I did, only with other corporations. So, off we went, me and my trusty second chair, who was a young man from Yale law school.

When we got to the meeting, not everyone was there. We entered, me and my young male colleague, and a man already seated at the long conference table said to me, without really looking at me, "Darling, I'd like some coffee. Anyone else want coffee?"

Now, since I was new, no one knew me.

So, I took the coffee orders, while my colleague stood still like he had been stuffed.

I went to the galley, poured a few Styrofoam cups of coffee, poured in lots of salt - lots - and a bit of milk for those who ordered "regular."

By the time I got back with my tray, every man in that room knew who I was and what had happened. When the first man tried to apologize, I shushed him, shrugged it off, and watched as they all drank their coffee.

We got along really well after that, and everyone always got his own coffee. And mine.

We're on a good track, are we not, ccbombs? Thanks for that dead-on assessment. (It was still fun puncturing that "sir" balloon, though .....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #214
228. Thanks OLL
I know we've had our differences on other forums but I've always enjoyed reading your posts. You're one of the wittiest and most acerbic members of DU. I like your style, Lady! :hi: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #228
229. Back atcha, cc
We got bigger fish to fry than piddling differences of style, I agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #74
266. Well, sugar, despite the fact that you've drawn at least one
quick conclusion about me based on not enough fact, I will give you this: you caught me, fair and square! I responded, in knee-jerk fashion, to the tone of your post.
Kudos for the catch -- I've been around this board for quite a long time now, and the low post count is the result of thinking about whether or not I want to respond (9 times our of 10 the answer is "no"). I bow to your ability to elicit a response.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
106. there's a problem with 'ma'am'
I've noticed that it's often used to be sarcastic or to be overly obsequious and condescending to women. (At the very least, if someone calls you ma'am you KNOW they're trying to sell you something). 'Ma'am is not in common usage anymore and does not function as the equivalent of 'sir.' So consequently I don't use 'sir' in business situations, I just use their name instead. These terms are fading.

I don't have a problem with casually referring to women as girls or men as boys, as long as it's not used when someone knows they should be saying 'woman' or 'man.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #106
169. many young women now take "ma'am" as hurtful
i was shocked when i encountered some young women who thought the waiter was disrespecting them by calling them "ma'am"

i explained this is the south and it is considered polite, after all, the man did not know their names, so he could not address them by name, the choice was to say "ma'am" or not address them at all

i suppose he could have said "miss" but that's more appropriate for a 12 yr old, not an adult woman ordering a martini!

some days you just want to put your head in the sand and not say anything to anybody because some people just live to get their feelings hurt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #169
191. you illustrate the problems
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 02:36 PM by marions ghost
with the term 'ma'am' as it is used today. It is not a neutral term. There are negative connotations. It is too often used as a put-down, or sarcastically if a woman's behavior is considered too bossy. Younger women do not prefer the term.

It is a problem in social situations where someone needs to be respectful but does not know the person's name. I guess waiters have to use their best judgment. They are assuming a temporary social role, not to be taken too seriously. Often they say 'sir' but 'blank' to the woman--again reflecting a societal problem with the term 'ma'am.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #191
284. younger women feel it's a crack abt their age
you hear them talk abt the first time they were called "ma'am" and how it made them feel old

for my part i don't think it's offensive to notice that you're not 14 any more, and i think "miss" is creepy for an adult woman

so what is the poor waiter to do?

he's gonna offend somebody, i guess!

frankly, as long as the intent is to be respectful, i don't care what they call me, it is not my job to make their job harder

but it still leaves me not knowing what to call someone whose name i don't know

"hey you?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #169
196. 'Madam' and 'miss' inherently refer to marital status, not age.
That's the problem. I wouldn't be offended by being called 'madam' but it's not really accurate.

Addressing women without reference to marital status is a real hassle, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #196
210. Around here I had been referred to as "senora" instead of "senorita"
even though at the time I wasn't married.

So it seemed to be more based on my age/maturity than my actual marital status. Either that or the cultural expectation is that you should be married by a certain age (I was 31 when I married). Perhaps calling a 29 year old woman "senorita" was considered inappropriate :shrug: but I wasn't put off by it because it was obvious the speakers were trying to convey respect, which is what it's all about, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #196
244. Military uses ma'am I beleive.
Never heard someone return a salute and say good morning Miss, Girl, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #106
202. I use it when being polite to an older woman or one in a position
authority. Professors, deans, bosses, etc, until they tell me to call them something different. I was raised to use it as an exact analogue to "sir." Teachers are "sir" "ma'am" or Mr/Ms/Mrs/Dr. It's sad that some folks who weren't raised right ruin it for those of us who were.

FWIW, I'm 19, and from a midwestern blue state. Being polite should trascend age and geography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #202
203. I agree with being polite
but you have to realize that the term 'ma'am' has been denigrated in many people's eyes to the point that it is not analogous to 'sir' in actual usage. Too much negative baggage.

Good luck in your efforts to reclaim 'ma'am' as a neutral term. It will be an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #202
243. That's a good strategy. I'm from the military community and I do the...
same thing.

When in doubt, be formal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #202
269. My parents taught me to always say ma'am and sir
If my dad calls me from another room, I'll still say "yes sir."

To me, it's being polite and respectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #106
232. I'm a military brat -- the language works for me. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Same Here About "Boys"
I leave meetings that i've run by saying (if all attendees are boys, or i'm leaving with any women and only guys are behind) "Thank you boys!"

At the golf course, when i see a group that i regularly bump into, i will say "Hi boys!"

However, i don't use the term "girls" when referring to women. I let my wife do that! However, i have, when talking to her, referred to some young actress as a "girl", even though they're over 18. But, they're still under half our age. So, not sure if that's kosher or not but it doesn't bother my wife, and i'm only saying it to her.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
75. It doesn't bother my husband, either,
when I refer to him as . . . oh, that's not relevant here, really.

Nominal linguistics. You don't like the word - don't use it. You like it? Use it.

People take issue with your use of the word?

You learn more about them than they ever planned to let you know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. Good Point
I use the word "boys" all the time and have never gotten a negative reaction. I didn't mention before that i refer to my band, all the time, as "my boys". So, i do it a lot, i guess.

I am a little more shy about the use of "girls" though toward women (except when i'm talking to my wife, and i guess you, since it wouldn't offend you two). No reason to cause hard feelings.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #75
149. Ah think you and ah...are refering to the SAME thing here re. "the boys"
Ahem. I used to refer to part of my ex-boyfriends "lower regions" as "the boys".

Oh heck, so I did :)

Okay, I know, I need one of these...here it is...get ready...



:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #149
153. I learned that one just recently in a novel I read.
I knew 'girlfriends' were breasts, so it makes sense.

Hell, it's fair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #153
164. See? SEE HOW IT WORKS?
This is serious stuff, dammit.

"Girlfriends" are breasts?

Since when?

I am SO old, I've missed all the new stuff. Last one I remember - wait, it's coming back to me, wait, wait, I've got it now - was "bodacious ta-tas."

Or is that just Southern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #164
177. I learned that one on Queer Eye and have since noticed it ...
being used by others.

It just went right over my head before Queer Eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #177
183. Really?
It's so OLD, and you must be SO YOUNG.

:::: sigh ::::

I heard one on "House" a while back:

"funmelons."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #153
167. Yes, his were "the boys" and mine were "the girls"...we used to
Phone each other up at work, and he'd say "How are the girls doing today?" and I'd say "Oh they're fine...how are the boys doing today?" and he'd say "Oh they're fine"

It was funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #149
160. Who doesn't?
But, since you asked for it, here ya go (OldLeftie's version of spanking):

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #160
173. Heck
Ouch! That's what you call a HEAVY DUTY spanking!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. I do it all the time, despite the flack I got on ONE occasion.
Where I'm from (New Orleans) it is considered endearing, as well as "dawlin'," "honey," "cher," etc. The flack came from someone who was a recent transplant from New England. She tried to admonish me but I just laughed and said "OK." She later apologised, in a round about way, after she got to know me a little better. :)

There's nothing wrong with it as far as I'm concerned. There are MANY more important things like protecting a woman's right to choose, equal pay, gender bias at school and work, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
76. Well, well, well,
a boy/girl/you know who gets it.

Here in Mr. Jefferson's Commonwealth, not only do I take great pride in being one of the first girl members of the Bar, but I do love having been called "ma'am" by youngsters since I was 30.

There is a charm there that really does me in. But, I also have girlfriends (eeek!) who have railed for 30 years about that appellation, "ma'am."

So, it's all a matter of personal preference, self-image, and how comfortable you are with the stuff that doesn't really matter.

There's much bigger stuff out there to deal with, and I do fear for the coming generations who might be distracted by the trees and overlook the great big forest that's going to blot out their hard-won (by my generation) rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
129. I'm in Connecticut...
and was just on an elevator with two women older than me (in their 50s) and another women around that age got on the elevator, and one of the first two called her "honey"...

So, it's not just a Southern thing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
248. Explain this one
When I lived down there I was referred to as "Mr. keith". WTF is up with that? Never did get used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #248
253. Way'at Mistah Keith!
It is how we endearingly talk to our elders while showing the utmost respect.

If you speak Spanish, it is kinda like using vos instead of tu or Ud, (in some Spanish speaking countries that actually have vos in their vocabulary and use it that way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #253
255. Damnit, I don't want to be an "Elder"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
46. Hey ol' Lefty, how does "Haybag" grab you?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #46
71. Grab this bag, you old troublemaker.......
I got yer bag.

Yeah, that works for me. In fact, it works for you, too.

Let us go and haybag together, my pretty...... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. It depends....
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 09:39 AM by Bridget Burke
"Girls" can be insulting or friendly. Who's talking? A male boss discussing female employees? Or a Woman-Some-Years-Past-Girlhood planning an outing with her fellow WSYPG's?

"Chick" tends to be more annoying. It apparently came from the Spanish chica. But Spanish nouns have gender, so chico is also available. Much better than "male chick."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sometimes
I was at a business lunch the other day with three other women. The youngest of us was around 47-48 years old. The very young waiter repeatedly called us "girls". I guess he thought he was being friendly, but it was weird.

My mother hates to be called "you guys" when there are only women present.

I think "ladies" is probably the safest thing to say without offending anyone, at least here in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. IMO - "ladies", is the nicest term to use
That word sits really well with me - respectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
49. Yes, but it is an earned title. And has been misused by advertisers...
"Men's and Ladies watches on sale!"

They are not comparable terms. 'Men' means adult male. 'Lady' means well-behaved adult woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
115. Ladies
is an archaic term associated with charm schools and restrooms.

"Ladies and Gentlemen" reminds me of the carnival barker. I'm expecting a description of the bearded lady or the guy who eats live chickens to come next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #49
257. I've never thought of the term
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 06:48 PM by hopeisaplace
'lady' meaning well behaved...ok. I'm thinking about this as I'm typing..still thinking...you know to me it means a well educated, informed, humorous, sensitive, confident, person who can take on a man if required and still hold on to her feminine qualities: "lady". Unless Jerry Lewis says it...laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadddddyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy....:silly:


edit: spelling, re-phrasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Here in the South, "Ma'am" is often used when addressing one "lady"
Respectful--but a bit of a shock the first time you hear it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Yes, thank you -- I'm with your mom!
My mother hates to be called "you guys" when there are only women present.

As a woman, I find it really inappropriate, especially in upscale settings, when my friends and I, in heels, perfume, makeup and manicures are casually addressed by the maitre'd, concierge, ticket taker or whatever, as "...eyyy, how are you guys doing?, or "Can I help you guys?"

That's crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
103. Same here
Maybe it is a southern thing, but I'm a 62 year old woman, not a guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
101. Doesn't Lady mean
Servile to the patriarchy? I know a lot of feminists in the 70s hated the term Lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #101
117. 'Lady' has been miss used for so long. "HEY Lady, move your car!" etc.
I associate it with being called out to, by cab drivers, etc.

I do refer to my female friends using the collective 'ladies' all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #117
134. Well LADY is really illustrative of the complexities of language
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 12:42 PM by iconoclastNYC
And how STUPID it is for someone to shrilly demand that you not use a certain word because they don't like it.

From wikipedia:

LADY --- More recent usage: sexism

Non-sexist language guidelines forbid its use to refer attributively to the sex of a working person, as in lady lawyer and lady doctor. Many find these to have a condescending nuance not shared by female lawyer or woman doctor (should the sex be relevant at all); compare poetess for a similar problem.

Some advocates of non-sexist language recommend not using the word at all, whereas others permit its parallel use in the same circumstances in which a man would be called a gentleman or lord (for example, titling washrooms Men and Ladies would be considered sexist, but using either Men and Women or Ladies and Gentlemen would be acceptable; as is landlady as the parallel of landlord.)

In the United States, notably among younger feminists of the 1990s and 00s influenced by riot grrl, "lady" has occasionally been reclaimed in a more ironic fashion. For example, Miranda July's Joanie 4 Jackie chain letter videotape project is said to consist of "lady-made movies," a feminist music and video distributor in North Carolina called itself Mr. Lady Records, and chorus of Le Tigre's song "LT Tour Theme" from the album Feminist Sweepstakes (2000) declares itself to be written "for the ladies and the fags."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #134
138. Wikepedia is total crap written by the last person to read the entry.
It means nothing.

'Lady' ISN'T sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #138
150. You don't know much about WIKIPEDIA
You can edit it, but edits get noticed and improved by a community of people. Its a lot more sophisticated then you know.

Is there something in the quoted text you disagree with or do you just like to dismiss a resource by calling it crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #150
155. No, in many contexts entries get dominated by cliques. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #155
260. Vague.
I've been using it for a long time and I find it an excellent resource and apparently a ton of other people do becasue it's a run away success but thanks for your vague negative generalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #117
174. yes, "lady" is definitely used by rude people
it doesn't have good associations at all, it's for people who are yelling at you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. With all due respect

Get Over It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. with all due respect
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 09:46 AM by raccoon
plonk.

Why is your profile disabled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. With all due respect

It's none of your business

But thanks for asking. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
48. I'm a female and I use the term "girls", I don't think there's anything
Wrong about it Mr. Raccoon. I also call men "boys" often.

I'm a girl, so there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
57. It's an informal/diminutive term. It's not always appropriate.

If you're referring to your colleagues of equal standing or your friends, it's okay. But too many people have used these terms to emphasize difference is status, not unlike President Bush's giving people nicknames while they have to call him 'Mr. President'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #57
73. Well I don't use it to put anybody down
So I think thats okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #48
77. GIRLFRIEND!!!
Have one on OldLeftie (also a girl):

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #77
136. Aw shucks, don't mind if I do :)
You know, people get all wound up over the most trivial things, it's...crazy, so it is.

Hey I always thought you were a boy...and now I find out that you're a girl! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, and as in English, it can be a put down AND it can be
a term of endearment. It's the context that matters as much if not more than the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
56. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, I'm a 45-year-old girl
and I don't mind being called one and often refer to my peers as girls and ladies and, of course, women. I'm bothered by men calling us females. It has this biological, animalistic sexual feel that makes it seem sexist to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
29. I'd like to speak for the young males
I'm 19, and all the males and females my age (I'll use the scientific terms to avoid mischaracterizing anybody :) ) refer to the females about our age as "girls". I think the reason for this is because all our mothers are "women", so as not to conflate the two, everybody not old enough to be our mom is a "girl". This isn't some Oedipal complex thing either, both the males and females do it.

Of course, there could be another reason, but this is my hypothesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vonslagle Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. It's indicative of age:
Young girls want to be called "Women."

Older women want to be called "Girls."

I'm getting used to being called a "Dick."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #31
83. Welcome to DU, vonslagle
I love you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vonslagle Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #83
180. Thank You
(*blush*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
158. I'm 27 in three weeks, so I'm young and I use the term "girl"
So I don't think it's indicative of age at all.

Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #158
168. 27?
I have dental work older than you, my pretty.

::::: sigh :::::::

Happy Birthday (a bit early, but OldLeftie forgets these things)!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vonslagle Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #158
189. You Go Girl!
Actually, I think I meant it's indicative of one's comfort level with their age.

Someone who cherishes their youthfulness will delight in being called a girl. Somone who feels they aren't getting the respect their entittled to, demands to be called a "woman."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2bfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm not crazy about it either.
Sometime the context doesn't bother me at all but other times it seems demeaning. I am also not very fond of "lady" it just grates on my nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Womyn just wanna have fun
As usual -- I'll say it slowly, so everyone can understand -- it's all about context. C-O-N-T-E-X-T. Context.

End of story.

Equating the term "girls" as applied to adult females to calling a black adult male "boy" is no equation at all. Not equivalent: gender*age NOT EQUAL TO gender*race*age. Divide by zero, result undefined. Game over. Thank you for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #34
68. .
Well said, boy.

:applause:

I go by just about anything that isn't the B word or the C word. It doesn't matter to me. And I certainly don't equate it with calling blacks "boy."

I see the lithium hasn't kicked in yet.
fsc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #68
195. You go, girl
Go? Go where? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
35. I think it depends on a few factors...
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 10:16 AM by JHB
...i.e., the relation between the speaker, the subject, and the audience (particuarly the degree of informality involved, the degree they display basic respect (or, conversely, boorishness) the rest of the day, etc.), lines of authority (and whether those are used or abused), relative ages, etc.

If it's an appropriate informality, then there shouldn't be a problem. And when it's an inappropriate informality, you can usually tell there's more of a problem involved than just a poor choice of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
36. The Irish in my family do it all the time - I've been refered to as a
"lovely girl" many times...I'm 42, professional person, married for years...hardly a girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
142. In your family it makes sense.
In your office with clients, it would not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momisold Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
37. I'm a 50 year old girl
and am not offended at all. I've tried saying "gals" but it sounds stupid to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
38. I can see we're addressing the critical issues here.
Add this one to the speech code book. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #38
84. Yes, yes,
I love you, too.

Welcome to DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. I think this is more prevalent (and acceptable) in the South
When I was living in the UK, it was said, sometimes in a demeaning way by men, sometimes in a friendly way among women (e.g. 'Let's all get together tonight, girls!'.

But I think, generally, in the South, women (even feminists) would object to NOT being called 'girls'. Because they think of themselves as girls. Some of them (the Neiman Marcus set) in the infantile, cutesy, Daddy's-girl way (which is probably what you have an issue with), others (the rest of us) in a fun-loving, pro-female kind of way. If another woman said it to me, I would not be offended at all. If an old man said something like, 'You girls need to _____', I might be, depedning on his tone... you know?

That's my demographic contribution. I am in East Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momisold Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. You could be right.
I grew up in West Texas. And I will always be a daddy's girl, even though he passed away in 1998!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. I live in South Carolina and the two "girls" I know
who use this word the most are from New Jersey and Pennsylvania. I don't think I've ever heard my mom, sisters, aunts, or female cousins use this term. Just my experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #39
86. As a transplanted Midwesterner
now living in Atlanta, I believe you're correct.
I used to ask...so, is she 14? When a guy would say something about the "girl" he was dating. I used to find it very irritating and demeaning. But I've found that to be the least of my battles living in the South.
Like...these people are still fighting the Civil War. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
41. I hate how people say "utilize" when "use" is sufficient.
But, unless we want to start legislating people's use of language, I guess we'll just have to complain about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #41
62. 'Use' and 'utilize' have not been used to establish hierarchies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
213. Pet peeves have to qualify now?
Are we in competition for the greater offense or something? Heirarchies are established by people, not words. For words to work, the listener has to either be superstitious or prone to suggestion. Simply calling a woman "girl" does not put the speaker heirarchically above the woman without the woman and everyone else responding in a confirming manner. In fact, among the ranks of egalitarians and feminists, the effect is reversed.

And, actually, "utilize" has been used in a jargonistic way to be exclusive and to appear more sophisticated, so you're wrong. Pbbt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #213
238. Calling a 'woman' a 'girl' is a means to reinforce hierarchies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #238
247. Breathing is a means to commit murder.
We can make random observations all day long, but that won't make one opinion any more or less than any other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #247
250. Do you think it's okay to call black men 'boy'? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #250
254. Sure, if the person saying it is willing to face the consequences...
...of doing so. I wouldn't, but then I know better. However, this is a distraction from my original assertion that my opinion is no more or less better than anyone elses. You can believe whatever you like about it, that's your opinion. However, I do not feel that we should legislate language use, and we enter dangerous territory when we start to accept it. Restricting communication, even the kind we don't like, serves to enslave us, not free us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #213
279. Well 'I' is used instead of 'me' to sound more sophisticated.
But these terms do not directly refer to a hierarchy as referring to a woman as a 'girl' does.

The term 'girl' was used in the workplace to refer to subordinates.

In your private life, use whatever you want with your buddies, but in public speech, err on the side of formal and polite. You SHOULD care how people react.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #279
288. That's largely your opinion.
"I" is used instead of "me" because most people don't know English grammar and have used it incorrectly for so long that the improper use sounds correct.

The term "girl" is still used to refer to women both in and outside of the workplace, and not necessarily to establish a heirarchy (which presumes the acceptance that a girl is somehow less than a woman). Social heirarchies are established outside of language use, not by it. Calling a Black male "boy," as per your earlier example, does not elevate the speaker heirarchically, nor does it lower the Black male's status. It is merely a matter of manners and insult.

What you think people SHOULD do is a matter of opinion, nothing more or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
43. Referring to 'women' as 'females' implies something less than human. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Same for "male" I guess. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Correct! I live in the military community where 'women' are often...
referred to as 'females' and it really bothers me. And when I was in polling, referring to 'males' and 'females' bothered me.

I say, "the female senators voted for the bill," and "the female ??? responded to the serum more quickly than the males." For humans, it's an adjective, in science it's used as a noun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. How about "chicks"?
And "dudes."

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. In the right setting, by your friends, it's certainly okay! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #55
241. Hmmm ok by what standards?
I think individually things are taken a multitude of ways and it becomes, at times, cumbersome to try to take into account how all people feel about all things. 'Safe' speaking seems less realistic in a cultural context to me than just letting people speak as they do and realizing that they are different in how they address things.

I try not to worry about how people will react to my terminology nor do I sit about trying to gauge, in general, what things I can say to best make them happy. Either they accept my hillbilly ass for what it is or I see them as the more intolerant of things than they see me as being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
181. I was with a GIRLfriend one time and a waiter asked me
"Is this your chick?" and she was so enraged at the term his ears must have begun to burn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
51. Notice when in one sentence a man is called man & a woman is called girl
btw "you guys" is not "asexual."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
52. Yes, and we speak English here in Canada ;-)
As usual, this sort of thing depends greatly on the nature of the relationship one has with the individual. With strangers it's presumptious. With friends it can be an acknowledgment of the closeness of the relationship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. That's the kind of thing I was just about to post...
Whether I'm comfortable with or insulted by any title depends on the relationship I have with the speaker and the attitude expressed (warmth, respect, good-natured humor or sarcasm and disrespect) to me when I'm addressed. I can't make a blanket statement about how any of these terms would effect me when we're speaking out of context w/respect to the whole conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
53. I am 36 and I still say "girls" unless they look old
It just feels strange calling someone my age, a woman because I still feel young. If I see someone who looks much older than I am the word "woman" comes out naturally but not if she is around my age or younger.

My old roommate was a female 33 years old and she called her boyfriend who was her age a "boy". I will never forget her saying "I just met a boy". I thought it was cute and didn't take offense thinking she was sexist. She obviousely still associated dating the way she did when she was young. It was a subconcious statement.

So are we supposed to start saying "Woman-friend" rather than "Girl-friend" now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #53
85. Oh, honey
Believe me, 36 IS young. You'll realize how young it is when you grow up to become an OldLeftie.

The friends I have will always be my girlfriends. Always have been, always will be.

We got other fish to fry besides worrying about what we're called. We just don't want to miss Last Call, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #53
252. 36 is young
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 06:19 PM by marions ghost
but not a girl. If womanhood is not where it used to be, ie. about 21 --just where IS the magic line where you'll actually call somebody a woman? Only when she gets truly, visibly old?

The problem may be that for casual conversation, there is no good female equivalent to 'guys.' (Boy is the logical equivalent to 'girl.') When somebody says "this girl' and they turn out to be approaching 40...well it seems ridiculous...in a way that doesn't happen when you say 'this guy' for a male of the same age. 'Guy' is more age-neutral. It seems a little pathetic...like you're trying to hold back the hands of the clock, to refer to a woman in her 30's as a girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
58. Personally, I'm offended by any term which defines gender at all.
I think Comrade is ideal. That way, we are always completely equal.

Examples: Comrade Smith, Comrade Bergeron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. Good suggestion. :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Labels do not make people "completely equal" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #58
80. But then.....
people like Bill O'Lielly will scream...."what are you, some sort of Christmas attacking hating COMMIE!!!!"......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
60. "Females" was used everytime a human resources
manager had to refer to women in the work place. "Female" denotes gender, but not species. He seemed uncomfortable using the terms "men" and "women". I doubt he would have called us "female homo sapiens".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. That's really interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #60
96. I hate the term "females" when used in that fashion. Far more offensive
than "girls". I think common usage of "females" instead of "women" started with various rap group/ singers that promoted a less than progressive view of women. The term is used to reduce us to faceless subhuman animals, as nature programs usually refer to "the female" or "the male" when clinically discussing animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #96
118. Exactly. It implies something less than human. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriverrat Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #60
146. The species was part of his job title
Hello, Ilsa,

I know that I am going off topic somewhat, but the term
"human resources" has always seemed to be a degrading term in my opinion, as it tends to define employees as commodities rather than people, such as the old fashioned term "personnel," which is still used in some places.

What started this trend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #146
204. I dunno. I always preferred "Personnel" myself,
but that was the name of the dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
66. The problem with these things is..
... that they can be diminiutive or not depending totally on context, a complex context including relationship, tone of voice, verbal context, etc, etc, etc.

I abhor hard and fast prosciptions against using this term or that, except for the obvious racial epithets.

But as much as I value my free speech, I make an effort to not offend anyone unintentionally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
67. one of my pet peeves
is overly sensitive people, too quick to take offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. I am with you on that
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #67
78. If you spent a good chunk of your life being referred to as a child...
then it would bother you.

It's something men often don't understand, but should be considerate of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #78
81. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #78
206. I'm frequently referred to as "boy" or one of the "boys"
always have been

doesn't bother me

I'm about as considerate a person I know, but context is always important.

You last sentence generalizes male behavior inaccurately and unfairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Err Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #67
91. That's one of mine, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
69. A few months ago I was having breakfast at a local coffee shop...
Seated near me were two two young males (by "young" I mean 30-ish: I'm 52). They looked to be dressed in what I refer to as "corporate causal." Anyway, there weren't many people in the shop at that time, so it was easy to hear their conversation.

It sounded like they were both in management/ownership positions of their companies, because they were talking business and constantly saying things like, "Well, I'll get my girl to contact your girl with that information..." in reference to the office staff.

I thought, "Man, how old are these 'girls'? Chances are they're older than these two unenlightened boobs!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #69
82. Exactly, KansDem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
89. So, if I say "I'm going out with the boys" it's OK if they're all white?
But not if one or more is black.

Gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #89
107. Context is everything. Gotcha. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
92. Let me guess
You're under 40.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #92
205. Nope. Over 40. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
94. Girls is better than "ho's"
In my opinion, a women is still a girl until she turns 30. Then she becomes a woman. And she doesn't become a lady until the age of 50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #94
95. um, wow...
"a women is still a girl until she turns 30. Then she becomes a woman. And she doesn't become a lady until the age of 50."

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #95
108. Men can't be 'gentlemen' until 50? Or women ladies?
Incorrect.

To be 'gentlemen' or 'lady' is an appelation you earn through behavior.

Similarly, officers in the military are officers and 'gentlemen'. They supposedly earned it.

It has nothing to do with age, but rather, merit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
97. Gay men call each other boys all the time
And i've heard women call other adult women girl too.

Stop telling everyone what they should use and what connotations you think words have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. Gosh, you sure come across as authoritarian.

Sure you're not Republican?

And stop telling me what I can and can't say.

You stop telling other posters what they shouldn't say and what connotations they think words have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. It was a parody of your OP
Which tells everyone not to use that word because it's your PET PEVE.

Hypocrite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #105
140. You have trivialized other people's concerns.
Language DOES matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #140
151. Well i think it is trivial to order people
Not to use a word that most people don't have a problem with.

CONTEXT matters more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #151
163. Context is important.
But trivializing people's concerns about how they are addressed doesn't help.

Go through life a short, red-headed woman, and you'll learn not to like being called 'girl' by people you don't know.

Just as black men were correct to be offended at being called 'boy'. Used this way, the term reinforces a hierarchy. For so long women were in mostly subordinate positions in the workplace, and referring to women in the workplace as 'girls' is a holdover from that. That's why it matters.

On a personal level, and in a personal context, it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #151
166. See my post # 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #97
109. In the workplace it matters. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrhopeforwes Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
98. for what it's worth...
I would say, "I'm dating this girl...", saying "lady" or "woman" sounds so damn formal. but I don't think of myself as a "man"...I'm a "guy." ...don't be so damn caught up on literalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #98
104. See my post # 11.

And stop being so damn authoritarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #98
112. Those terms seem perfectly appropriate for the situation.
I sense you wouldn't refer to a client who is an adult as a 'girl'. It's perfectly fine to say "I'm dating this girl." You're not at work, you are speaking about informal relationships about people of equal age/social standing. Why not refer to her as a girl? No one's saying you shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
132. I HATE "Guys" for women!!
What next? A re-make of the musical "Guys and Guys"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
135. I agree.
I think it's condescending.

I'm a teaching assistant. This semester, I'm the TA for an elementary school methods course. I'm the only male in a room of over 20. "Girls" would be condescending. So would "gals." I just don't like the sound of "ladies."

I try not to use gender-specific language for two reasons: first, I don't want to sound condescending, and second, I don't want them to even think about me noticing their gender. I want them to feel like they can come into the classroom and not feel like they're being drooled at.

Fortunately, I'm at a southern university, and "y'all" is both gender-neutral and acceptable! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
143. Nice thread
After reading all the responses, I understand 'girls' is demeaning / chauvinistic, 'females' is dehumanizing, 'ladies' is creepily polite, 'you guys' is irritating and and absolute no-no, and 'gals' makes people's skin crawl

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #143
152. I know, it's a hassle, isn't it?
When I was in Russia the same problems cropped up. The term for young women, devushka, was really a perjorative because it was most commonly associated with calling out at indolent shop girls.

Just try and err on the polite side my friend!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #143
170. And, you just know that
using "fuckers" isn't going to work well, either, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #170
178. All right, game's up, you made me laugh! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #178
185. heh heh heh
"Old age and treachery,
Always overcomes youth and skill.
Ain't too much that we won't do;
What Waylon won't, Willie will.

Even though we've spent our lives,
Chargin' up the wrong side of the hill.
Old age and treachery,
Always overcomes youth and skill."

Written by Max D. Barnes, Willie Nelson, Troy Seals and Waylon Jennings.
(© Act Five Music/Hardscratch Music/Irving Music/Waylon Jennings Music.)
From "If I Can Find A Clean Shirt", © 1991, RCA.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #170
187. Do you remember a protest group in the Reagan time
called "Ladies Against Women?" I wish that lighthearted approach would resume, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #187
188. I never heard of them, but
what a GREAT name for a remarkably sane-sounding group.

Yeah, it's kind of sad to watch all that energy and, sometimes, anger creep into what is essentially a meaningless matter. There's so much more to do, so much more fun to have.

And, you really do get so much more done with laughter than you do by being all that serious and stuff.

Of course, when my clients go off to the Big House for the rest of their lives, they don't think it's funny, but, you know, f*** 'em if they can't take a joke ..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #188
192. Someone posted a picture of them on DU one time
and they were somewhat on the order of "Billionaires for Bush."
I got their humor but that particular era did not have a lot of nuance or irony. No internet in the Reaganzeit. Nor the underground papers I used to peddle in the 1960's for 20 cents a copy and I could keep a nickle for beer money. (How pathetic that sounds!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #192
198. Not pathetic at all
Remember a "nickel bag" or a "dime bag"?

A six-pack wasn't even two bucks.

Those underground papers were the internet of yesteryear. We knew, even back then - we knew.

Cheers, pal:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #198
201. O yes, I remember them.
and a case of cheapo beer for about $3.99. We helped keep sane with the underground press (I was on the staff of a few of the evanescent productions) and the DU is the closest I've been since. Actually superior in the efficient propagation of antiestablishment invective and insight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #187
256. I remember them
They came to Dallas during the 1984 repub convention. They were wonderful:

http://blogs.salon.com/0004123/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
156. I work with a female colleague who has a client that's always saying
... "I'll have my girl call your girl."

Makes her nuts. She's tried to tell him umpteen times, "I AM THE GIRL" -- just doesn't seem to register.

In the context that jerk uses the word, I think it's not only sexist, it's condescending, belittling, whatever you want to call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #156
277. Yeah, I do think "girl" as used as a substitute for "assistant" ...
is kind of annoying. It's got all of those "girl Friday" connotations ... there's definitely cultural baggage there.

For the other usages, I'm not sure it matters all that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
157. You know what I hate?
Overly sensitive people who accuse everyone of authoritarianism.

That REALLY burns me up.
fsc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
159. it is not the equivalent of calling black adult males "boys"
it is strictly context, in a business environment, calling a woman a girl is not proper, in a social or family environment, it is very proper and friendly

it's girls' night out when you're going out w. yr friends, not ladies' night out, which sounds like a bunch of old fuddy-duddies in their 80s

in high school, when our principal called us, "young ladies," we knew perfectly well that it was trouble and that the word "lady" is an insult and preface to being chewed out

"girls" is for fun

agreed, the word "boy" has too much baggage, but this girl over forty is happy to say that "girl" simply does not have the same baggage

calling someone "lady" is pretty much rude and brings back horrible memories to anyone who was once a teen, i realize "lady" has a different meaning in england, but in usa it's a word used to scold and shame

and there is a place for a name that is not so clinical as women or females

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
161. Why not just call people by their names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seedersandleechers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #161
171. Exactly. This AM my landlord's rep. kept calling me sweetie.
I'll except it maybe one time in a conversation-but not 10 times. I'm old enough to be her mother. Geesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #161
176. because you don't always know the name
of course the easy way out is just to use the name

but in the example of the martini drinking women who got freaked because the waiter called them, "ma'am," what the heck can a man do?

yr waiter doesn't know yr name if you are not a regular at that restaurant, these were tourists from out of town

i think we need to assume that most people are doing the best they can

jumping up their nose abt it isn't helpful to anyone's cause, there are bigger battles

as a tiny older female, i really don't care if you call me "girl" or "ma'am," just don't call me late to dinner, what i object to is when you get in my physical space or take other actions that actually cause me harm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
165. I think you're going to have to get at least a majority of your fellow
females to agree on this, I've been admonished for both. I was raised feminist and was always told never to call a woman that, Then I got older and started seeing a lot of women that told me it was a term of affection and they wanted me to call them girls. Maybe you could wear signs or a bracelet or something. Same goes for opening doors.
What's a guy to do? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #165
274. Signs or a bracelet sounds like a good idea :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #165
275. Dupe. nt
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 09:36 AM by raccoon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
172. but i Love my girLs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
182. The girls go
Where the Boys Are. (starring Paula Prentiss etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
193. LOL I used to agree with you, but when I hit 50 I liked being called
a girl again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
194. Actually, I'm more offended by "ladies". I don't know why.
Calling women "girls" even elderly women always seem to me to be an affectionate term. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #194
212. I agree
I hate that term. The "ladies". "Hey, Lady!" "Young Lady" (usually reserved for an angry parent)

Still, I wouldn't like to be called a girl at my age. Or maybe I would, if it means you think I look 21.

:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
199. some people get offended by anything
I think this is ridiculous

my mother refers to her and her friends as the "girls", and I know many other females over 21 years of age that call their friends "girls" or "the girls"

just like I might refer to my friends as "my boys"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
200. never used the term girls, I use gals. As in guys and gals. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #200
219. GAL!!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #219
225. Are you dissing me?
|
|
V
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #225
230. Ah what?
Is something wrong with gal? Is this yet another term that I have to censor myself from using???????

Freedom of speech is just that.

oy vey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #230
262. It was a *joke* (not directed at you)
omega minimo responded to you by puking over the word "gal". I asked if that was a diss at me because of my sig, lol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evirus Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
208. i do it
i do it out of efficenticy, its just quicker and easier to say for me... heck call me a boy if you want to i dont care, as long as you refer to me as an actual person, know what i mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
209. I guess I'm old fashioned
If you're a human female and you're 18 or over, you're a "woman".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
211. Any female under 25 is a girl to me
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 03:11 PM by incapsulated
I'm getting old.

Usually I just call them "kids".

Damn kids.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
216. My husband called me a "young girl" a little while back when
talking to his aunt. I cracked up and reminded him that I turn 40 this year and already have scheduled my "mid-life crisis" (I want to get it over with early--LOL).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
217. It maybe a pet peeve but there can be political correctness gone overboard
We could refer to us as being <gender> Homo Sapiens. e.g. "You see that female homo-sapiens standing by the alcoholic beverage dispensing artifact? I think she is very pleasing to my eyes."

Political correctness gone overboard.

There's not that many slang names used for women (unless it's derogatory) in the UK.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #217
221. "pleasing to my eyes"?!
That is a sexist/judgmental statement! Are you suggesting that the female homo-sapien exists solely for the pleasure of your visual senses?! Why are you singling out that particular comrade for personal evaluation of a blatantly sexual nature?

Back to the re-education camp with you!


(and don't call me a bird)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #221
283. lol :) - there of course is the politically _incorrect_ way:
"Cor look at that slapper kegging down them bacardis. She's a stunner! Look at the bazookas on her! She's a bit of alright... nudge nudge wink wink say no more!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
220. I can call older women "women," but when it comes to women my own age
I feel weird calling them "women." It just sounds strange coming out of my mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #220
222. Because you're probably still...
A girl. Enjoy it while it lasts. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #222
251. I'm actually a 23 year old "boy," does that still count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #251
261. lol, yeah...
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 08:10 PM by incapsulated
You can still call girls your age... girls. ;)

I assumed you were one from the way you wrote that, sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #261
271. Maybe I should have just said: "that's probably it"
it's not like you have any way of knowing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
224. How about girlies? Is girlies all right? n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 04:31 PM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
227. I think it's petty to worry about it
I love when my boyfriend calls me "doll", "babe" or his "girl" but I really don't care for it much when someone calls me "ma'am".

I think people are just to sensitive these days, too thin-skinned and way too easy to take offense. Don't we have more important things to worry about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #227
240. That's great. We're talking about terminology used in public settings...
and spaces with non-family members.

I have a friend that calls me 'doll' too and I get a kick out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #240
246. That's what I'm saying
I think people are too thin skinned and ready to jump down anyone's throat over any perceived or imagined infraction of personal space. Like I said, I hate being called "ma'am", but as far as pet peeves go, that is way down on the list and I'm at the point where there are so many IMPORTANT things to think about, that as long as someone doesn't call me ***stain or f***wad or stupid or something like that, who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
233. This is the sort of thing that makes progressives look silly.
The PC crap is really grating.

I'll speak any way I damn well please, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
236. Some people are afraid to call women "woman"-- afraid of the power of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #236
242. the issue
I think it is the power or lack thereof and what it says about our society.

So you have a woman lawyer and she doesn't care if she is called a girl - because she is comfortable with the power that she has.

Other people are more sensitive to noticing - like the cafe example where the two 30ish businessmen refer to the women who probably do secretarial work as "girls". And there is a patriarchal implication similar to blacks being called boys. It's the power thing. The social order of things. (Of course women can refer to each other as girls - just like black men can call themselves boys if they want to.)

When you consider that secretaries - when the job was done by men was a higher status/better paid type of job - well - it just goes to show you.

And what now - if more and more women become lawyers - will there be less status/less money - at least unless you are a "corporate" lawyer. I think it may be happening already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #242
273. Thank you, Bloom.
I think it's just as you said, "the issue...is the power or lack thereof and what it says about our society."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
239. Depends on the context. An Accepted Definition is as an informal reference
to a grown adult woman.

It can also be offensive.

It can also be a definition of an immature woman or young female child.

Depends on context according to dictionary.com :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
245. Even worse than being called "girls" is when a male boss
refers to a female assistant as "my girl." Your girl? I don't think so, Lardbelly. There's not enough money on the planet to buy this "girl" and slavery isn't fully reinstated yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
249. Of all the things to get annoyed about...
...this has got to be about the most trivial.

"Bitches" and "hos", I could understand, or maybe "chicks" -these have negative connotations. Even women address other woman as "girls". It can actually be very flattering. Besides, it's generally not applied to women of accomplishment.

"That Madeline Albright is a great girl!" Who would say that?

Men address groups of men as "boys" or "fellows" all the time. Unless it's a white guy addressing black man/men, it's not a problem, either.

Personally, I wouldn't use it in reference to a woman over 30. But both men and women under 30 are pretty much green kids anyway, so why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
259. I'd rather be referred to as a "girl" than "man"
Especially since I ovulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
270. I hate ALL speech
telepathy is nowhere near as messy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenMaster Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
276. It is NOT equal to calling black men "boy"
fer chrissakes, what ridiculous garbage. One look at history shows the difference between common slang usage and demeaning racist slurs based on a history of slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #276
280. A man calling another man a 'boy' in a work setting...
is being hierarchical.

Similarly, a man referring to a 'woman' as a 'girl' is doing the same thing.

Sexism is acceptable whereas racism is not? I'd rather do without both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #276
281. Calling women "girl" is common slang frequently in demeaning sexist usage
based on a history of sexism.

There is an equivalence b-w sexist and racist "common slang." It is now more widely acknowledged and recognized that racist language is harmful. We still have a way to go with sexist language-- especially on DU.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenMaster Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #281
286. Admitted!
"Girl" can absolutely be sexist when used demeaningly, but there are many cases where it can be used either as self-description (I know many females that will refer to themselves and their companions as "girls", including "girl's nights out" and "girlfriends", etc)or as the equivalent of "boys" in casual adult social conversation.

It is not an inherently prejudiced term like "boy" is for black men, which has an immediate historical connotation of slavery. I also agree that this nation has a lot of work to do when it comes to eliminating sexism against women, but again, there is not the immediate, automatic connotative connection to a blatant history of brutality.

I'm a little sorry I let myself get dragged into this discussion: civil rights for all people is paramount. I do feel, however, that getting upset if someone says "girls and guys" instead of "girls and boys" or "guys and gals" is just simply goofy and will not move progressives anywhere but around the same old useless, tail-chasing circle we have been repeating for decades.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #286
289. There's a range of use and acknowledgement of problematic usage
is a simple enough thing.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #281
291. Yes, Omega...
I'm fairly new here, and the regular usage of sexist and demeaning language still surprises me: referring to people as "pussies," complimenting men - and women for "having balls," etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #291
292. Surprising, isn't it?
Still working toward a time we can say "It is now more widely acknowledged and recognized that sexist language is harmful."

Just to have it ACKNOWLEDGED is frequently too much to ask at DU. It has to be ARGUED, instead of recognized as the reality that it is.

Thanks to DrunkenMaster for an outstanding example of how to bridge the gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
282. I'm not offended by "girl", but then I'm 41, so it's a compliment
I don't think it has the same historical connotation that "boy" does when applied to black men in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
285. so can I still call adult men "Girls"?
Not that I do it often but I know plenty of other guys that do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #285
290. A male friend of mine often uses that phrase, "between us girls"...
when he's going to tell me something VERY interesting, so I look forward to hearing that phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC