Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Cindy Sheehan's work diminished by the financing she is receiving?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:51 AM
Original message
Is Cindy Sheehan's work diminished by the financing she is receiving?
I am in the middle of an argument with a freeper. He is criticizing the fact that she is getting money from Soros and Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream. I am struggling to figure out why it matters who finances the movement.

I keep thinking of Tom DeLay and corruption in the Republican party. And the anti abortion movement and its financing. But those are completely different subjects and I want to keep the focus of this discussion on Cindy.

Any ideas for a good rebuttal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Show them this >
And remind them that this was on the Thursday after Katrina hit (on Monday), while New Orleans was drowning.



http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001784.htm



Blogged by Brad on 9/1/2005 @ 8:46am PT...

EXCLUSIVE: Karl Rove Makes Surprise Visit to Camp Casey!
Greets, Thanks Bush Supporters Opposing Cindy Sheehan
Snubs, Ignores Combat Vets, Gold Star Families Who Made Ultimate Sacrifice for Bush's War

CRAWFORD, TX - Driving his own pickup, with two trucks blockading both sides of the street, Bush Administration Senior Political Advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff, Karl Rove made a surprise sunset visit/photo-op Tuesday night to the half dozen or so Bush supporters camped across the street from "Camp Casey" in Crawford, Texas where Cindy Sheehan -- whose son, Casey, was killed in Iraq -- originally made her stand requesting a meeting and an explanation from George W. Bush, The BRAD BLOG has learned from eye-witnesses.

According to supporters from both the Bush and Sheehan sides of the street at the makeshift protest sites, Rove's visit occurred as the bulk of Sheehan supporters and volunteers were enjoying a final "thank you dinner" down at the larger Camp Casey II several miles down the road on Tuesday evening.

The BRAD BLOG has obtained exclusive photographs from Rove's quick glad-handing and back-patting with the few pro-war, pro-Bush stalwarts who were manning a counter-protest site across the street from Sheehan's original camp.

<more>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks!
Wow how did I miss that?

I love that "half dozen or so Bush supporters"!! I was there and I can't describe how pitiful they looked across the road in their ONE tent. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You missed it because the entire world was focussed on New Orleans
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 08:09 AM by Stephanie
Except for George "Katrina Who?" Bush, who didn't return to work until Thursday, and Karl, who was gladhanding the Crawford freepers, and Condi, who was buying $400 shoes and enjoying a Broadway show, and Dick, who was still on vacation and buying himself a new mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. I just remembered
that after Katrina, Camp Casey was moved to LA. Now which side has a better motive here? Rove goes to Crawford while Cindy's supporters go to help the hurricane victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. remember the volunteer lawyer who could not locate his little daughter?
He was posting here - his daughter was staying with friends while they were at Camp Casey, and after the hurricane he could not locate them. It was terrifying but he finally did find her after several very long days. Well then he immediately turned around and went to help Veterans for Peace with relief efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. yes thank you for reminding me of that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't know Cindy was running for political office?
otherwise, why should it matter where the money comes from to support her, unless of course, it comes from illegal sources like selling drugs or something?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. This was the first thing I thought of as a reply
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 08:04 AM by proud2Blib
WHO CARES?

The only problem is he told me last week that Soros was financing Cindy and I said no, that is not true. Now he has proven me wrong so I need a strong rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You don't need a rebuttal. You are not GOP, you can admit a mistake.
Don't buy into that Bushbot thinking that a REAL MAN never admits a mistake. The thing is that your mistake re Soros is not material or relevant to the validity of Cindy Sheehan's actions or message.

What's wrong with Soros? Why should anyone have to apologize for his support? Simply say, "You were right - Soros has given her some support. But that's fine with me. I like to see wealthy people use their wealth to give poorer people a platform to spread their ideas. It's not like Soros is buying Cindy's vote in Congress, or bribing her to submit legislation which benefits Soros."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Great!!
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
36. If it wasn't the financing, it would be something else.
When somebody criticizes Bush, wingers will attack with anything they've got. It took them quite awhile to come up with something to use against Cindy Sheehan, so they're sticking with it. If you disagree with them and you're not perfect, then any imperfection will be will be exaggerated and used against you. If you ARE perfect, they'll just make something up and use it against you. It's not about reason--it's all about "winning".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. That is very true especially when I think of
Michael Moore and all those websites that try to discredit him. And the swift boat liars.

Oh how I despise these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
43. Yes answer back with the anti Cindy protesters chant "We don't Care"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I already told him about them
When he called me an extremist after I told him I was there with Cindy in Texas, I replied with a few stories of real 'extremists' I met there. There was that busload of "we don't care!" and the guy who drove over the crosses and the guy who drove up and jumped out of his car yelling something about Ted Kennedy. THOSE people were extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. What does it matter?
Soros and B&J willingly give her the money and she willingly takes it. No laws are being broken. What's the problem here? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. My thoughts exactly
Now I would like to dig up some slime who are financing the RW. Like maybe Abramhoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. 2 word answer: Paula Jones n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Good one!
But I doubt this freeper would understand the implication. I would need a link.

Thanks, I will look into that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ask him about Richard Mellon Scafe and Sun Myung Moon
They amoug the original and large supporters of many right wing causes and think tanks.

And what the hell is wrong with Ben and Jerry? A couple of guys who built a successful business from the ground up and got rich. Sounds like the American Dream and classic example of what conservatives are always espousing.

Soros? Well, he's a litle shadowy, but compared to Sun Myung Moon and some of the other dark souls behind conservatism, Soros is tame.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes that is so true
Scafe has spent how many years trying to discredit Teresa Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. I don't understand the point from the freeper, but what's new
in the US political parties or movements are financed by private interests in a way that would be ILLEGAL in most democratic countries. If the GOP get millions from private fundraisers who are tied to big industries, why couldn't Cindy get money from whoever ?

Personally I think that it is unethical (and anti-democratic) to finance any political movement by other means than by tax money shared against the amont of votes you get in an election. The private funding should be reduced to $100 as a symbolic gesture.

but comparing "little" Cindy's legal funding against the GOP's (legal ?) one is preposterous. How much money are Republican agitators getting from Halliburton et al ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Well, in the freeper world,
Soros and Ben and Jerry's are evil. Who cares why? I don't but I do know they are considered the enemy to the RW. (Which makes them OKAY in my book :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. It takes money to follow bushitler, it takes money for bail and
a sustainable effort. It takes money even to live in a ditch! I have heard this attack too and even from my dem friend, but it is total bullshit. I say I don't give a shit where the money comes from, just keep fighting Cindy! You are worth EVERY NICKLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. The RW are just grasping at straws here
The few smart ones have given up on this debate. How low do you have to go to insult a grieving mother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. There is no bottom. It's the eternal pit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. Soros And Ben And Jerry Have Shown Good Judgement...
Regarding Bush and the illegal/immoral invasion of Iraq. They are not criminals. What's the problem?

This is "guilt by association" and Scott McClellan tried to use it on Murtha by connecting him with Michael Moore. Only Moore was RIGHT about the war saying it was a "fictitious" war fought for "fictititious" reasons and he said that in 2003 and he's been proven RIGHT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. I didn't dare bring Michael Moore into this debate
But I agree with you 1000%.

Maybe one day he can finally be viewed as a hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Fourmi_Rouge Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Absolutely!!
For Cindy Sheehan to have any moral authority at all, she should be sleeping in the rain and eating out of a garbage can, wearing sackcloth and ashes - can't you see that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Makes me wonder where KKKarl slept when he was there
hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. A question -- Did Soros finance her?
Maybe he did, and there's be nothing wrong with that.

But he seems to be a bogeyman the right wing is always trotting out. Like "George Soros financed Air America." he didn't. I'm sure Air America would welcome an investment by him, but so far he hasn't. But that hasn't stopped the right wing from tossing him in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Is Soros a criminal like Abramoff, DeLay, Scanlon, Ken Lay, etc?
Or is he just a liberal guy with money made on legitimate business, funding somebody who is not (at this point anyway) running for anything, to get justice for her son?

And no, being librul is not a crime yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That wasn't my question
I'm not saying there wouild be anything wrong with it if he did.

But it makes a difference whether the notion that she is a puppet of Soros that the right wing is claiming has any validity, or is just anoter falsehood perpetrated that is not based on facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. Anybody who's seen her speak knows she is no puppet.
She is tough, dedicated, and has a mind of her own. If some wealthy people happen to agree with her, that still does not make her a puppet. And I don't specifically know where she is getting her funding. Haven't heard any allegations of criminal sources, and as long as she stays away from that (duh) she is standing on way higher moral ground than your freeper's heroes. There is nothing wrong at all with accepting funding from any legal source! Saying she shouldn't accept funding is totally idiotic - they just want to shut her up. Apparently it's only OK for freepers to be funded. Hypocritical jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. I know that, and I'm not disagreeing with you
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 11:19 AM by Armstead
What I am getting at is the completely distorted view that is being spread by the right wing about all of this.

It's a matter of exposing the spin that freepers are being fed by.

Even if there is nothing wrong with her recieving money from Soros, that fact that they convince people it is true is one of the core problems of why Freepers freep. This ideas of a well-funded monolithic conspiracy of the left.

In otehr words it goes on two tracks:

1)What kind of distortions are people like the freepers buying from the leaders of the GOP and right wing? For instance, MoveOn.org is a grass roots coalition funded by a broad base of grass roots people. Buyt because Soros is one of those thousands (millons) of peopoel who have donated to MoveOn, the right wing mischaracterizes it is "his" organization.

2)What's wrong with people controbuting money to causes they believe in?

If the first "meme" -- that Soros is some mastermind who is driving all progressive and liberal activities -- is shown to be false, it makes it easier to make the second case.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. I just bring up Scafe
every time they trot out Soros. Scafe is truly evil. Soros is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. The GOP is funded by criminals (Abramoff). Cindy is funded by ice cream.
Do you see a pattern here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. LOL
Unfortunately, yes I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. all you have to do is ask this person
who finances any of the gopers you might care to use? Abramoff seems to be in the pocket of almost all the pols on the hill. If it matters where CS gets hers than it matters where these "officials" get theirs.
CS is a private person. Speculation on her income is a cheap shot at undermining her and warrants no response.
Tell you "friend" to screw themselves. It's none of their business. Nor yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Here's what gets me
EVERYTHING costs money. No one came into this world guaranteed a free ride.

And I am glad he brought this up. I told him that since he wants to change the subject from the anti-war movement to financing political causes, then fine, I will be GLAD to have that conversation. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
26. You do not need a rebuttal.
No one needs to try to justify Cindy Sheehan. There is no need to try to find a rebuttal for those who would yip about where she might be getting financial support from. In fact, attempting to do so only implies that there is some merit to their stance .... and there is not.

The attempt to focus attention on who may be supporting Cindy's efforts is simply an attempt to distract attention from the efforts themselves. In the art of public debate, or in the skill of discussing differences of opinions, that tactic should only be pointed out as being a distraction, and never given any more serious credit than that. By no small coincidence, it is the tactic that only the losing side takes. Thus, you should not invest in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. Great advice
and spot on. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:55 AM
Original message
Certainly.
It's funny that the "opposition" tries to get under your skin with crap like that. I guess what really bothers me, as not only an American but as a human being who feels compassion for any parent who loses a child in this war -- no matter what their political views may be -- is where Cindy Sheehan isn't getting any support: the Bush administration.

The president's inability to have compassion for a mother who thinks differently than him exposes the shallowness of his saying that it is okay for Americans to debate the war. That is an appropriate topic of discussion involving Cindy Sheehan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
39. No it doesnt.
I'm not the biggest Cindy fan around here (though I respect her cause...methodology lately seems to have gone astray,IMO), but her funding does not diminish her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. It takes money to do the things she does
and it isn't like Soros and Ben and Jerry's are evil. They share political objectives. So I don't see a big deal.

Now, if she were financed by AlQueda, maybe I glance up from my poker game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
41. It takes money to do this
and it isn't like Soros and Ben and Jerry's are evil. They share political objectives. So I don't see a big deal.

Now, if she were financed by AlQueda, maybe I glance up from my poker game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. Ask him: Didn't this all start as one grieving mother acting by herself?
And does the fact that more & more people are standing by her somehow invalidate her cause? These are simple human questions to ask your cynical friend.

Terri Schiavo's parents didn't turn away the help of Randall Terry and the Right to Life movement during their highly public campaign to save their daughter, did they? I believe they also got financial support as well. Was your friend critical of them for that?

Also, from an August 25th story which looked at Camp Casey financing:

"...There is also the "Cindy you don't speak for me tour," a caravan of military wives and mothers led by Deborah Johns of Roseville. Her son William is a marine who has served two tours of duty in Iraq.

The caravan is getting a lot of help from MoveAmericaForward.org. It's a non-profit organization co-chaired by former state assemblyman Howard Koologian. Koologian is a Republican who takes credit for launching the recall against Governor Gray Davis. His co-chair is KSFO Radio talk show host Melanie Morgan. The group's PR firm is led by a veteran California political strategist and the firm claims clients running from a county supervisor to President of the United States. ..." http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=politics&id=3382521

Is he critical of them too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
45. Have you asked him why it matters to him?
Can't refute if he's got no arguments. I mean, just making a claim is no argument.

And if he's a freep, just how important is it to him that Cindy's work is NOT diminished?

If it isn't important to him that her work is not diminished then i don't think we or Cindy have any need for his advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. He is trying to make Cindy look bad
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 07:31 PM by proud2Blib
and me too since I was down there with her. Ever since I told him that, he has been in attack mode. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. That's the free market for ya'
People with money are free to give it to those who are getting out a message they agree with. He doesn't believe the free market should be stifled, does he?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
50. soros and ben & jerry are good guys, right?
what's wrong w. getting financing from them?

there's nothing to rebut

it ain't like getting financing from marion barry or drownie brownie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. Is Hannity's/Limbaugh's work diminished with the millions they are making?
Ask him if the money Rush makes and uses to support communism by buying Cuban cigars has corrupted Rush's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. Before she got the money and the PR people
I posted here that it could backfire on her and to some degree it has.Im not saying its improper considering what she is fighting for,only that it would be used against her.I would just point out that she is not wealthy and she should be able to raise money but should also bring up that there arent any strings attached to those donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. IS CHENEY"S WORK DIMINISHED because of his HAL MONEY?
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 07:51 PM by elehhhhna
why even talk to such a moran?

You must be a very patient person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm glad she's getting that financing...
The more the better. i gave money when she was protesting in August - I think people who are good cannot be given enough money to spread the good word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
55. I'd say her work is VALIDATED
by their contributions. George Soros is a very intriguing spirit and those unfamiliar with his life would do well to read up on him. For me. it speaks well of him that he supports her.

Next time I be in the Innenstadt, I be dropping a dime on dessert.

Honestly, P2BL, I can't even imagine WHY you feel the need to defend Cindy to Neanderthals. Simply tell them to fuck themselves and enlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'm out of the loop
Are Ben & Jerry's verboten?
((I say this with dreams of Cherry Garcia dancing through my head))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
57. Who Cares? I hope she gets filthy rich
After what she has gone through, she deserves it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
58. DEAR HYPOCRITE: Republicanism is Corporatism.
YOU BELONG TO A CORPORATE PARTY! YOU ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR.

HELLO!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC