|
I usually feel pretty informed about most of the information regarding Iraq and the US. As it turns out, one of my son's classmates has a parent who is a staunch republican. We were talking about the Iraqi Invasion today and, of course, I was arguing against it.
I held my own pretty well until she brought up France and Germany. She said something I personally had not heard before. She said that they were only against the invasion because it would hurt their interests since they had a stake in Saddam remaining in power. I assumed she meant the oil for food stuff. She had said this in response to me saying that a lot of bigger countries did not back us up because they have their Intel as well and they knew there were no WMD's. I said no one had gone against us going to Afghanistan but they knew that the reasons for going to Iraq were bogus.
I am not that familiar with the oil for food scandal and so I did not feel qualified to argue the point since I do not make information up.
I know the RW is going to think whatever they want but I will be meeting with this woman again since we will have a play date. I really held my own on all points except this one. I would really like to know if there is information out there stating why France, Germany and others did not back us up. I understand there are other countries such as Canada and I do not believe they were involved in the war for oil scandal, were they? Perhaps I need to go back over all this information and learn more about the oil for food scandal. Are there any links that can help me with why we were not supported in our illegal invasion?
Thanks for any and all help.
demgurl
|