Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday Times Confirms Hadley was Woodward's Source

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:01 AM
Original message
Sunday Times Confirms Hadley was Woodward's Source
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 12:06 AM by kpete
Sunday Times Confirms Hadley was Woodward's Source
Sat Nov 19, 2005 at 06:01:55 PM PDT

Breaking out of London, the Sunday Times confirms Raw Story's report of earlier this week that Bob Woodward's Plame source was none other than National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley:

THE mysterious source who gave America's foremost journalist, Bob Woodward, a tip-off about the CIA agent at the centre of one of Washington's biggest political storms was Stephen Hadley, the White House national security adviser, according to lawyers close to the investigation.

Woodward, the Washington Post reporter who broke the Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon out of office, has refused publicly to divulge the name of his informant without permission, which has thus far been withheld.

It should be noted that the byline on the article is Michael Smith, the reporter who brought us the Downing Street Memo.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/11/19/20155/526

and this from the Independent Online:

The leading suspect, meanwhile, appears to be Stephen Hadley, currently the President's National Security Adviser, who pointedly failed to issue a clear denial when asked if he was Mr Woodward's source. Pressed during a presidential trip to South Korea whether his convoluted initial answer meant yes or no, he replied: "It is what it is."
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article328151.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Paging Mr. Fitzgerald."
Your lawsuit is waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. yep, see this thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You beat me to it sabra! ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. How did I miss this all day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. They've been peeling layers off this onion for quite a while---I
can't wait to see who is at the center.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Clue:
"Go fuck yourself."

Cheney and Rummy are the movers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Can we throw in the Ham Sandwich for good measure, too?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feistydem Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, now we have a leaker from offices of VP, Prez and Secty of State?
Gee, this looks like a conspiracy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wasn't Hadley Condi's #2 when she was NSA?
And he moved up when she moved over.

Who from STATE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And they still are trying to claim their bosses didn't know|?
I wonder how that makes the bosses look better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. I already posted this in the link sabra posted above. Layers and layers
of onions...

Stephen Hadley; One of 23 administration official involved in Plamegate
http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal

<snip>

ROVE COMMUNICATED HIS CONVERSATION WITH COOPER TO HADLEY: After Karl Rove spoke to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper about Joseph Wilson (according to Cooper, this was the first time he learned of Plame’s identity), Rove wrote Hadley an email. The July 11, 2003 email said: “Matt Cooper called to give me a heads-up that he’s got a welfare reform story coming. When he finished his brief heads-up he immediately launched into Niger. Isn’t this damaging? Hasn’t the president been hurt? I didn’t take the bait, but I said if I were him I wouldn’t get Time far out in front on this.”

HADLEY SEEN AS “EYES AND EARS” FOR CHENEY: In 1989, Hadley served as assistant secretary of defense for international security policy under then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. Hadley admitted Cheney was “a factor” in his hiring as deputy national security adviser by President Bush in 2001. The Washington Post reported that some saw Hadley as Cheney’s “eyes and ears” at the NSC.

HADLEY WAS WARNED NOT TO CITE URANIUM EVIDENCE: Hadley briefed reporters on July 22, 2003 to explain why the bogus intelligence should have been excluded from Bush’s State of the Union. Hadley noted his receipt of a memorandum from the CIA, dated October 6, 2002, that explained why references to Iraq’s pursuit of uranium was dropped from Bush’s October 7 speech against Iraq. According to Hadley, the memo provided “some additional rationale for the removal of the uranium reference.” The memo described “some weakness in the evidence, the fact that the effort was not particularly significant to Iraq’s nuclear ambitions because the Iraqis already had a large stock of uranium oxide in their inventory This memorandum was received by the Situation Room here in the White House, and it was sent to both Dr. Rice and myself.”

HADLEY REVIEWED POWELL’S SPEECH TO U.N. WHICH DID NOT CONTAIN URANIUM REFERENCE: Prior to Powell’s speech, Condoleeza Rice’s deputy Stephen Hadley led “the White House effort to sift through the intelligence with the help of the CIA,” and tried “to determine what can be released without damaging the agency’s ability to gather similar information.” The uranium reference mentioned in Bush’s 2003 State of the Union just one week prior was deleted from Powell’s speech to the U.N. because Powell said it did not stand “the test of time.”

HADLEY COORDINATED WITH TENET ON TENET’S APOLOGY: The Washington Post reported, “Behind the scenes, the White House responded with twin attacks: one on Wilson and the other on the CIA, which it wanted to take the blame for allowing the 16 words to remain in Bush’s speech. As part of this effort, then-deputy national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley spoke with Tenet during the week about clearing up CIA responsibility for the 16 words, even though both knew the agency did not think Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger, according to a person familiar with the conversation.”

MEMBER OF THE WHITE HOUSE IRAQ GROUP: Hadley was a regular participant in the weekly meetings of the Bush Administration’s White House Iraq Group. The main purpose of the group was the systematic coordination of the “marketing” of going to war with Iraq as well as selling the war here at home. One clear example of this fact is that “the escalation of nuclear rhetoric” during the pre-war stage, “including the introduction of the term ‘mushroom cloud’ into the debate, coincided with the formation” of WHIG. The group included the two individual who have been confirmed as leakers, Karl Rove and Lewis Libby.

"It's a Slam Dunk" Woodward is involved in all of this...not Tenet.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Treasonous Republican Crime Cartel
Republicans must be feeling real proud right about now. So if Bush, Cheney, and Rice are impeached - or resign, unlikely - who runs the country? The underling psychopathic, treasonous, criminal liars in the House?

Is there not one Republican in this country with the integrity or love of country to say enough is enough? If they think this is just "the nature of politics", aare they willing to tolerate it as endemic to the American ideal of Democracy. I hear the word Republican and reflexively want to shower.

God save this country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC