Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Electonic voting in Georgia - UK Independent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 07:44 PM
Original message
Electonic voting in Georgia - UK Independent

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=452972


A quiet revolution is taking place in US politics. By the time it's over, the integrity of elections will be in the unchallenged, unscrutinised control of a few large - and pro-Republican - corporations. Andrew Gumbel wonders if democracy in America can survive


14 October 2003


Something very odd happened in the mid-term elections in Georgia last November. On the eve of the vote, opinion polls showed Roy Barnes, the incumbent Democratic governor, leading by between nine and 11 points. In a somewhat closer, keenly watched Senate race, polls indicated that Max Cleland, the popular Democrat up for re-election, was ahead by two to five points against his Republican challenger, Saxby Chambliss.

Those figures were more or less what political experts would have expected in state with a long tradition of electing Democrats to statewide office. But then the results came in, and all of Georgia appeared to have been turned upside down. Barnes lost the governorship to the Republican, Sonny Perdue, 46 per cent to 51 per cent, a swing of as much as 16 percentage points from the last opinion polls. Cleland lost to Chambliss 46 per cent to 53, a last-minute swing of 9 to 12 points.

Red-faced opinion pollsters suddenly had a lot of explaining to do and launched internal investigations. Political analysts credited the upset - part of a pattern of Republican successes around the country - to a huge campaigning push by President Bush in the final days of the race. They also said that Roy Barnes had lost because of a surge of "angry white men" punishing him for eradicating all but a vestige of the old confederate symbol from the state flag.

But something about these explanations did not make sense, and they have made even less sense over time. When the Georgia secretary of state's office published its demographic breakdown of the election earlier this year, it turned out there was no surge of angry white men; in fact, the only subgroup showing even a modest increase in turnout was black women.

There were also big, puzzling swings in partisan loyalties in different parts of the state. In 58 counties, the vote was broadly in line with the primary election. In 27 counties in Republican-dominated north Georgia, however, Max Cleland unaccountably scored 14 percentage points higher than he had in the primaries. And in 74 counties in the Democrat south, Saxby Chambliss garnered a whopping 22 points more for the Republicans than the party as a whole had won less than three months earlier.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quite a detailed article
Am forwarding it to my network (they don't read DU). Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't believe Democrats aren't shouting about this in Congress
We can't let this type of thing go on. Every member of Congress should be asking for Diebold to disappaer. It is corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone I know is gettting this.
Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope it's not too late, a year may not be enough time to get to
the truth of bbv. In the meantime the primaries may also be compromised!
I'd hate to see rove and bush* have any input in who they would run against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bump.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dude_CalmDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think I'm seeing triple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dog Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick, maybe some of our fellow DUers will get the idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC