|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:09 PM Original message |
Text of Murtha's resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Such a sensible resolution should get lots of yes votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. "At the earliest practicable date." Isn't that key? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Oh my God, do you honestly think this is that simple? The Repubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I would rather call their bluff and see many votes for withdrawal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. what is so hard about voting for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think the American people might well pass it, if presented to them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Certainly they would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Debate on the House floor right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. can someone explain section 2 - thnx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yesterday Murtha talked about some number remaining in Kuwait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. leave a group in Kuwait for emergencies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. A wise man and nation know when to cut their losses: fools continue their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Wanted to add the link at which I found this text -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. Recommended - this thread AND the Resolution! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kcass1954 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Everyone - call your rep right now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Idioteque (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Murtha Resolution is not what is being debated!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 04:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Then Dems should say, hell, no -- let's vote on Murtha's resolution. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-18-05 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. No mention of: no-WMDs, and no-9/11 connection, but seems adequate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC