Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Woodward's source was so secret than why did he tell Pincus about it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:30 PM
Original message
If Woodward's source was so secret than why did he tell Pincus about it?
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 09:32 PM by Halliburton
I still have a hard time believing he told Pincus about it in June like he says. What an asshole.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if it were so important, why did Pincus deny conversation?
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 09:35 PM by autorank

Woodward is an ass and worse. He's trashing his career in public.

I think he's scared, I think he realizes that he and the Post are on the wrong side (Neocon), and I think that Fitzgerald is one spooky mofo to the likes of Bob Woodward. Woodword meets and idolizes political hacks like Bush and the frigging SCOTUS. Then Fitz, iron willed, no bullshit and a true intellectual powerhose.

Bob is doing the incremental unravel...feeling like he's "twisting slowly in the wind."

:rofl: Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Nixon is :evilgrin: somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The next phase of Plamegate
In the next phase of the Plamegate scandal, major WPost reporter Bob Woodward enters the scene. The question is, what is the meaning of this development? Mr.Cockburn seems to have found a right way to describe the current situation. The theory is, Woodward's role is not really different from that of NYT Judith Miller. Well, this makes something clear: multiple layers of PR smokescreens aside, both journalists are nothing like objective investigators in search of truth about Iraqi WMD and origins of the Iraqi war. In fact, both were instrumental in the neocon designs in one way or another. From this prospective, Woodward's recent apology for God knows what can be quite useful to help Libby's defense.

Ever since the administartion has suffered a blow and Cheney's aid Libby (one of many IWMD crooks) has been indicted for purgery, they counter-attack. The goal is to show that everything was just fine about IWMD, nothing was found simply because they were not there, no fabrication at all.

So, let us wait and see whether recent Woodward's testimony will work for this end. All that matters is whether IWMD magic still works. If this is the case, Libby will get off the hook and nobody will get punished for the criminal outing of the CIA agent Valery Plame.

ALEXANDER COCKBURN, JEFFREY ST.CLAIR. The Long, Long Fall of Bob Woodward

http://www.juancole.com/2005/11/woodward-and-insider-trading-bob.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Both very interesting links, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. And why would he consider whoever told him a "source"?
Casual, unimportant stuff isn't kept secret from one's editor, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC