Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

See this? Liberal Channel a Non-Starter, Says Wright

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:48 PM
Original message
See this? Liberal Channel a Non-Starter, Says Wright
This is dated the 13th, so you've probably seen it by now, and someone has probably posted it by now...but, I just saw it today.


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6283390.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP

Liberal Net a Non-Starter, Says Wright

By Staff -- Broadcasting & Cable, 11/13/2005 11:53:00 PM

snip about a symposium where these remarks were made

Waxing nostalgic for the days when networks played current events “down the middle,” Wright lamented the over-the-top tone that cable-news channels are increasingly embracing. And, of course, he laid responsibility for it all at the feet of Fox News Channel.

Given that Carlson, a conservative in good standing, was hired earlier this year by one of Wright’s own channels to host The Situation with Tucker Carlson—a move by the perennially struggling MSNBC that was seen as hoping to snag some of Fox’s reflected ratings glory—he might have been expected to quiz his boss a little more closely on this point.

But instead, Carlson made a suggestion: Why not start a channel that overtly caters to liberals? “There’s tons of liberals out there,” Carlson said.

Going after a lefty audience would be futile, Wright said. “For some strange, probably genetic, reasons”—we’re pretty sure that was a joke—”they don’t listen to a lot of radio and they don’t watch a lot of television.”

Another disincentive: Despite all the media attention given to cable-news programming—from Bill O’Reilly’s histrionics on Fox to Anderson Cooper’s exhibitionistic empathy at CNN—American viewers are not all that interested. Wright pointed out that the cable-news networks combined draw fewer unique viewers all night long than a single half-hour of NBC Nightly News.

snip






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. sounds like he's arguing that Fox, CNN and MSNBC should close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. For some strange, probably genetic, reasons
Um yea, like being born with a brain?

What an extrordinarily insightfull thing to say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee, I wonder why we don't watch a lot of television--
Perhaps when I can turn it on and find something that interests me without trying to insult my intelligence, convert me to Christianity, get me to get rich quick in vitamins/daytrading/real estate, or persuade me that Bush is good and all that he says shall come to pass, I'll watch more TV. As it is I watch the stack of animated sitcoms and some sci-fi and the occasional Nature/Nova type thing.

(American Dad, btw, is out there swinging an axe for our side pretty hard : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. What A Moran...
I started listening to talk radio at the age of 12. I rarely do anymore because there's hardly anything for me to listen to.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. isn't that what they said about air america radio? n/t
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. That makes about as much sense as saying that we shouldn;t send
food to Darfur.. Those people don;t eat very much anyway:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there somewhere or someone I can write to about this?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well! Does Wright have that one wrong.
People are hungry for intelligent and accurate news programming, I'm sure Tucker knows that quite well from his e-mails. And it doesn't have to pander either right or left. The truth is sensational enough, as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC