Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House smears Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:12 PM
Original message
White House smears Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Steve Schmidt is not just a conservative pundit. He's the chief spokesman for Vice President Dick Cheney and serves as a "Special Advisor to the President." And today, he smeared a sitting justice on the Supreme Court.

ABC News' The Note contacted Schmidt about a report on a memo, written by Samuel Alito, that said "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion." In an on-the-record response, Schmidt defended Alito — and hoped to change the subject by launching an attack against Justice Ginsberg.

"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg had served as general counsel of the ACLU and had advocated liberal political positions including the ideas that the age of consent should be 12, there was a right to prostitution and polygamy in the Constitution and Mother's Day should be abolished. Republicans voted overwhelmingly to confirm her because she was evaluated on her qualifications and more than 12 years of jurisprudence as a federal judge."

First, the attacks are not only offensive, they're false. The right has been using these myths as talking points, but they've been debunked over and over again. As a result, what we have here is a White House official telling a major national news outlet blatant and obvious falsehoods about a sitting high court justice.

cont'd...

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/5832.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what can we do about this latest lie?
I am hoping that Justice Ginsberg will address it - but what can we do here?

I am so tired of this sh**, btw, but I know that goes without saying these days. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Letters to the editor.
Write your rep's in Congress. That's a start. This is part of their modus operandi. Telling lies and the American people believe them because nobody refutes their allegations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. What dastard villeins those varlots!
Smitem with a fork and turn it in their gizzards!

I'm in one of those medieval moods, I guess. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yea, verily, verily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Such blackguards these poltroons!
Such that have caused you to wax wroth, an' nary a word of recontumation uttered in aftersight!

Avast! and Devil take the hindmost!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I doff my plumed cap to the verbiage you have set forth here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You missed Talk Like a Pirate Day by two months
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sadly, 'tis only now your missive reacheth the denseness of my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Must have been "avast"
It was a word that found wide currency, and purchase upon the lips of the many, in high station and in low.

In modern parlance, "avast" means "go away". Such words ought find wider modern usage, as a good word neglected is a limb of the language lost.

And, yo, at least give me my props for not capitalizing every other noun. Fo' shizzle!

:P

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Hey, I didn't say it was a bad thing!
I likes me some pirates. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. i guess what i want to know is what was abc's response
when confronted with libelous accusations?

does abc point out that these statements are false when quoting schmidt?

wouldn't that be important?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I am looking for a statement now from ABC.
They obviously would know what an egregious statement that Schmidt has made. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to find the information on Ginsberg. Schmidt is a rabid dog who would say and/or do anything to promote his parties radical agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dear im10ashus: A few of us got carried away and hijacked your post.
My apologies. I hate it when someone does it to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's fine.
I will not hold it against you. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. So are they bullying her off the supreme court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No.
They are just making erroneous statements, per usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You sure they are not trying to diminish her existance..forcing a
change? Cause people like the Rove WH do that all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I wouldn't venture to guess what goes on in their fevered minds.
I only know that Schmidt's statement was false and misleading. Quell surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Called "swiftboating" I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. does anyone know if schmidt is mentioned in the scooter indictment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I don't recall reading his name in the indictment.
Let me go back and do a search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC