In referring Pat Robertson or Karl Rove as "Little Pricks," am I a sexist?

[Tom Yossarian Joad]

After reading a thread about the "B" word and catching myself referring to Rove as a prick, the question jumped to the front of the line in my bizarro brain.

Opinions?

[clydefrand]

1. Tom, I think you might be insulting pricks! :-)

But not a sexist.

Got any new art work?

[Tom Yossarian Joad]

10. Heh... Not much here lately... I've been having to earn money too

often the last few weeks.

Thanks for aasking.

[ChiciB1]

2. For Me... It's Inconsequential Anymore...

We have been Fucked over so much, most of us don't even know WHAT to think anymore!

Pretty much... it's up for grabs and name calling is minimal in the whole scheme of things. America is in big time TROUBLE!!!

[Betsy Ross]

17. If you're gonna get screwed

You aughta get kissed. We've been f*cked over big by those pricks. Can you be f*cked over BIG by LITTLE pricks?

[afdip]

3. you sound like a portrait of moderation to me . . .

[BJW]

4. and insulting "little pricks" too

[msongs]

5. depends on what you mean by prick....

as slang for a penis, you are doing penises a disfavor.

if you mean a prick, as in prickER, one who pricks holes in things, that is different :-)

or if you are labeling them in whole based on a proven point of anatomy.......hmmm

Msongs
www.msongs.com/liberaltshirts.htm

[rzemanfl]

6. No, calling him a fat piece of shit with a little tiny pecker and balls

the size of mustards seeds, would be slightly sexist though. So watch yourself.

[MrMonk]

7. "Little pricks"

Not sexist, just an anatomical fact.

[Rowdyboy]

8. As Curly of theThree Stooges would say...

"I resemble that remark!"

[melody]

9. No, just too kind n/t

[mongo]

11. You must have missed the memo

Didn't anyone tell you that it's only biased, inflammatory speech if spoken against an "oppressed" group?

At least that is the idea I get from the very loud few around here...

Or didn't you notice that the banned words list has no references to white males?

A particular word is only "bad" if it helps the "oppressed" in their identity politics of "victimization".

/offrant

[kath]

25. Oh, puh-leeze.

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

[cally]

12. Several male DUers have posted that it's offensive

so I pledged to not use it anymore on some thread this past week. I haven't used the word since I was a surly teen trying to offend adults so it's not difficult for me to not use it. :shrug:

[kohodog]

13. Actually, they're Big Pricks with little dicks

Now that is a sexist remark, eh?

[DistressedAmerican]

14. Don't Know. Do You Find This Sexist?

[Kurovski]

22. Now see, that's too coy.

It really would be nicer if the question were "Are you a big enough prick to be vice-pres?"

Some things comedy should never sacrifice.

[stillcool]

15. Don't know about sexist ...

but perhaps you're clairvoyant?

[NNadir]

16. No, but in calling them "little" you're sizeist.

[IChing]

18. I think you pick the wrong side of the human anatomy

They are great big assholes not little pricks.
Come to think of it, they are great big shitty assholes

I think that is not a sexist reference
so watch it, next time with those sexist remarks

[Gold Metal Flake]

19. "Sack of crap" is always acceptable. And accurate. And fun!

It's gender-neutral, too. Try it today!

[Kurovski]

24. Roberson & Rove= a couple 'a crap-sacks.

Hey, you're right! It is fun!

[Ilsa]

20. I've gotten to where I prefer to call them "turd burglars" myself. eom

[Kurovski]

21. Hmmm...

Oy! That's a chalare of a question! How about "lousy cocksuckers"?

Just be sure to add "lousy" so as to distinguish them from the suberb cocksuckers such as myself, thank you very much.

As a personal opinion, Robertson & Rove fall squarely into the "Jag-bag-mother-fucker" camp. But even that is bound to change depending on what the "Shmoiger-shvantz" twins are up to on any given day.

[leesa]

23. I hope I never have to confirm the fact.

None of those words bother me...bitch or prick or any of it.