Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Google Santorum. n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
keta11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:11 PM
Original message
Google Santorum. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bwahahahahaha!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keta11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thats some funny sh*t, right.

I wonder if he has tried to google his name lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm pretty computer illiterate so it always amazes me
to see stuff like this! How DO they do it? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keta11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I believe google staff have some

latitude in ranking the responses to queries. I used to think that the most popular queries ranked first. Then I found out that Google actually gets paid by advertizers to prime rank them.

I think someone at Google doesn't like Santo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Its my understanding
and google was founded on, the basis that they accept no money for their rankings whatsoever.

In fact, money can't even gaurentee you add space on the top and side ads.

There ARE search engines that accept money, but at least historically google isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The first definition is almost as distasteful as he is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great. Now google "failure" and hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 05:19 PM by IntravenousDemilo
ON EDIT: I discovered that you don't even have to click on "I'm feeling lucky"! Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. that is a riot. definitely the definition of failure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Santorum (and related word, "Brownback")
Edited on Thu Nov-10-05 05:39 PM by IanDB1
Google-bomb!

Santorum

Related Definition:

Brownback (Noun):

1) One whose back has been smeared with Santorum.

2) One whose back is often smeared with Santorum.

3) A puddle of Santorum that has been left on someone's backside.

Also as a verb:

To smear Santorum on someone's backside.

See also, "Brownbacked," which means "to be or having been smeared with Santorum."

Example:


I left Sam Brownbacked and sticky last night in a puddle of Santorum.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MooPie Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. ROTFLMAO
Hysterical!!!!!
How did it get that placement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Spreading Santorum and "The Google Bomb"
Google bomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A Google bomb or Google wash is a certain attempt to influence the ranking of a given page in results returned by the Google search engine. Due to the way that Google's PageRank algorithm works, a page will be ranked higher if the sites that link to that page all use consistent anchor text. A Google bomb is created if a large number of sites link to the page in this manner. Google bomb is used both as a verb and a noun.

<snip>


As an example of Google bombing, if a user registers many domains and all of them link to a main site with the text "... is a living legend" then searching for "living legend" on Google will return the main site higher in the ranking, even if the phrase "living legend" doesn't appear on the main site. A common means of exploiting this is through weblogs, where although the entry may disappear from the main page quickly, the short-term effects of a link can dramatically affect the ranking of a given site. Empirical results indicate that it does not take a large number of websites to achieve a Googlebomb. The effect has been achieved with only a handful of dedicated weblogs.

The above has to be qualified, however. A handful of blog links will not Google bomb someone like Amazon out of the top results for "books," for example. In fact, Googlebombs have generally had an impact on relatively "non-competitive" terms, where there's no particular page that seems to be necessarily the right answer.

The technique was first discussed on April 6, 2001 in an article by Adam Mathes <1>. In that article, he coined the term "Google bombing" and explained how he discovered that Google used the technique to calculate page rankings. He found that a search for "internet rockstar" returned the website of a Ben Brown as the first result, even though "internet rockstar" did not appear anywhere on Brown's webpage. He reasoned that Google's algorithm returned it as the first result because many fan sites that linked to Brown's website used that phrase on their own pages.

<snip>


Accomplished Googlebombs

Recent (as of 2005) and popular examples are:

More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmegan Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Brilliant
That's brilliant. I can't believe anyone acutally supports that j/a.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC