Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Plans to Leave its Equipment with the Iraqi Army

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:36 PM
Original message
U.S. Plans to Leave its Equipment with the Iraqi Army
The U.S. military plans to leave thousands of trucks and combat vehicles for the Iraq Army.

Officials said the Defense Department has approved a plan in which the U.S. military would not withdraw from Iraq together with much of the equipment deployed in that country since 2003. Instead, the U.S. Army and Marine Corps would transfer the vehicles and weaponry to the Iraq Army.

U.S. commanders and their Iraqi counterparts have been discussing the transfer of U.S.-origin weaponry and vehicles, officials said. They said the transfer to the Iraq Army would take place in stages.

"We have discussed what our ability will be in the long run to leave behind some additional equipment for them over time, so that they have the same capabilities that we do, or very nearly," Maj. Gen. William Webster, commander of Multinational Division, Baghdad, said.

http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2005/november/11_10_3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great
they will be able to fight our weapons with our weapons.

i only hope this means they are coming home soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whoa, whoa, whoa there nelliebush
WE paid for that equipment. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It will be so shot out that it will be cheaper to leave it
Fixing it and shipping it back would be expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Sadly
you have a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. No sense dragging blown up, burned equipment back here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. two choices
sell it to the chinese for scrap or blackmarket to the highest bidder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. It makes sense when you are trying to steal money. They leave the
equipment for excuses a, b, and c. They go home and issue new military bids for replacing left behind equipment. Another halliburton type front moneysucker gets the contract, overcharges the gov't by ridiculous amounts, and the scumbags pocket yet a billion more. It's ridiculous. I hope they all choke on the money they are stealing. :mad::mad::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yup, this means we will have to pay to replace the equipment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Of course
I remember in the F911 movie it showed Bush talking to a bunch of military contracters and stuff about equipment so he'll probably be doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. So the Pentagon/arms industry can boo-hoo and beg for more dough.
And, the generals can have nice seats on the boards of directors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dumping more money into the pit, this time off budget.
The DoD will have to buy replacements for what
they give to Iraq. Besides, what happened to
the billions of dollars Iraq got to buy arms?

This promises to be quite a buildup.
Are they planning for something big?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess that Iraqi oil revenue will pay for it.
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its all worn out anyway
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 09:46 PM by Fescue4u
They run the crap out of the vehicles. They run'm constantly, in dirty, sandy and very hot conditions. Not to mention the bullet holes and bomb fragments.

Today, the average american drives a car a few hours a day and then considers it worn out in 4 years.

The trucks and light fighting vehicles over there will see 100 times more wear and tear in 4 years than your average american vehicle.

Far more cost effective to leave'm there and buy new equipment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC