|
QUOTE Condoleezza Rice’s comparison of the Iraq war with the Civil Rights movement is so patently absurd that my 9-year-old noticed and commented on it. Rice and I both grew up in Birmingham during the Civil Rights era, and though our experiences were certainly quite different, I believe my own memory of that time and place is nonetheless valid.
What I remember of Birmingham in the 1960s was bad enough — “white” and “colored” water fountains and restrooms, racist chants and graffiti, TV footage of bombings and white-robed Klan, fire hoses and police dogs turned on protesters. I do not, however, remember any foreign superpower bombing our cities, killing civilians by the tens of thousands, and occupying our country for the ostensible purpose of defending itself against alleged weapons of mass destruction, deposing a corrupt ruler, exporting democracy, or whatever rationale for the Iraq war happens to be currently in vogue.
Rice’s arguments are axiomatic. Who would oppose the ideals of freedom and democracy? But aside from the strained credibility inherent in the Bush administration’s serial justifications for this war, it seems significant that civil rights in this country were fought for and won by an oppressed segment of our own population, inspired and motivated by principles of nonviolence.
Rice’s specious comparison seems more than anything a desperate attempt on the part of a corrupt administration to justify a failed policy in general, and in particular the continuation of an illegal and immoral war that is inconceivably costly in political, economic, and human terms.
Richard Evans Tuscaloosa UNQUOTE
|