Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Happy Marriage Protection Week!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:01 AM
Original message
Happy Marriage Protection Week!
Now hear this: Our great leader has just declared October 12-18 Marriage Protection Week!

Well, I'm married myself (15 years this December) and marriage has been very good to me, so I am interested in doing all I can to help protect the institution. So I visited the White House website about this...and imagine my surprise! They don't want people to protect my marriage at all!

"Marriage is a sacred institution, and its protection is essential to the continued strength of our society. Marriage Protection Week provides an opportunity to focus our efforts on preserving the sanctity of marriage and on building strong and healthy marriages in America. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and my Administration is working to support the institution of marriage by helping couples build successful marriages and be good parents."

Bastards. Well, you know what, I've been protecting my own marriage for the past 15 years, and doing a pretty good job of it without the White House's help. I guess that means our marriage must be kicking butt, compared to the national average. I mean I can't help but feel bad for all those straight marriages that need all this 'defense' and 'protection' from Congress and the White House. It really does boggle the mind. I mean, if you're straight, you have all kinds of people 'helping' you get married and stay married. Your family wants you to get married. Your church wants you to get married. Your state government doesn't care too much one way or the other but once you are married, they'll make it harder for you to stop being married. And now the federal government has made it known that they want you to get married. And yet...and yet...somehow...lots of straight people don't get married, and even worse, lots of straight people who do get married get divorced! I don't understand it! How can it be?

I don't know...could it be that pressuring people into getting married isn't the best way to protect marriage?

We certainly weren't pressured into marrying. Quite the opposite. My family didn't even know about our relationship for 2 1/2 years and when I finally did tell them, well, let's just say that it took my mother a further 8 years to be willing to interact with Liza in anything like a civil manner and leave it at that. We have never lived in a state with a domestic partnership law--in fact, fate has perversely chosen for us states with outstandingly reactionary politics and politicians--and we were both raised Catholic, so you can work out for yourself the odds of our ever having a church wedding. And yet, somehow, fifteen years later, we're still together--and still in love, still crazy about each other, etc. How did we do it? Without legal rights, without the Church's blessing, and without special presidential proclamations issued about how important our relationship is to the health of society and the state, what enabled us to stay happily married?

Well, I'll tell you the secret, folks. We are still married to each other because we want to be married to each other--and for no other reason.

That's what makes the difference between a long-term relationship and a lifetime commitment, folks: it's not a legal document or a gold ring, it's an absolute conviction that you need to be with this one person and nothing else will do. It's knowing that from now on the two of you are sharing one life, with all of its craziness and joy and misery and everything else, and that if you lost this person you would survive but it wouldn't really be living. It's knowing that one person, this one, the one you love, is an irreplaceable part of everything good in the world.

And it's knowing that you need to take care of that person *first,* despite your own selfishness, despite the horrors of the world we live in, despite work and the church and the state and all the obstacles that get thrown up in your path. It's knowing that you will always do what it takes to keep your love alive--and trusting that the other person knows it too, and will do the same.

Now if you've got all that, then your marriage is protected, no matter what the morons in Washington try to do to destroy it. If you don't, then your marriage is wide-open vulnerable, no matter what the morons in Washington try to do to save it.

When you put your heart and soul into a marriage and it doesn't work out, it's the worst thing that can really happen to a person. I've seen straight friends of mine go through this and it's agonizing enough to watch from a distance; I don't know how people live through it when it happens to them. But as much as I wish I could save all of my straight friends from the pain of divorce, I would never wish on them the kind of 'protection' that the White House appears to be encouraging. Because the one thing that would be more painful than getting divorced from someone you once loved would be having to stay married to that person after all the love was gone because the state and the church forced you to do it. The bottom line is that the only people who can save a marriage are the people who are in it, and no matter what kind of encouragement or support you provide, if the two of them cannot keep it alive, then there is nothing anyone else can do about it.

Here's the kind of 'help' that we all can do without: Fox will celebrate Marriage Protection Week by promoting and airing Joe Millionaire II, The International Edition. They have been advertising this during the Cubs games all week and it looks unutterably foul. A dozen plus European women compete for the affections of a "real American cowboy with a fake American fortune." Though the women appear to be drawn from a number of different countries, it is apparent that to Fox, Europe = France. "Would we lie to a bunch of European women who've never heard of Joe Millionaire? Oui, oui!" chortles one voiceover; another spot ends with "does anyone know the French for 'sucker'?"

The foulness of the Joe Millionaire concept, which trades on the old misogynist gold-digger type by inviting the viewers at home to despise these women for humiliating themselves in order to whore for a man who doesn't even have the goods, becomes exponentially more foul once it goes global. If Fox's honchos were paying any attention to our great leader when he frothed about sex slavery during his U.N. speech on Iraq, they would perhaps have realized that to build a show around a bunch of women from Europe prostituting themselves in order to snare a rich American man might have some unfortunate overtones. What's next? Joe Millionaire heads to a Thai brothel, while Americans guffaw as the brothel's owner and inmates compete to fawn all over him for his custom, only to find out after he checks out that his credit card has been declined? Because that's what we're reducing the whole transaction to, basically, once we turn on something like this.

And let's not even get into The Bachelor, Love Or Money, Temptation Island, and Married By America. Because I don't even know what all this shit means. That young Americans, frustrated with the singles scene, are now yearning for the days when marriages were business transactions and your partner was chosen for you? That the only aspect of the romantic model of marriage that has survived our decline into mondo capitalism is the dream of marrying the prince? That America has a limitless appetite for shows based around the humiliation of real women? Whatever it is, it's pretty fucking scary--and if I were interested in preserving marriage as a institution, I might go after the monstrosity that is reality TV before I went out looking for gay people to bother.

So. For President Bush and all the other people in the federal government who are so fucking concerned about the institution of marriage, I am happy to report that my marriage is in the pink and bloom of health and that we expect it to continue robust and fruitful until one or both of us dies. Good luck to all you straight married folks! From what I can tell, it's a jungle out there.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am betting National Chastity Belt Day...
...is not far behind.

Later,
JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. that is funny
I needed to be protected FROM my marriage

go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I am also betting...
Sphinctorum was somehow involved. If so, National Missionary Position Week cannot be too far off either.

Later,
JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Hey, cool,
missionary's my absolute favorite position (seriously), lol! Not that I've experienced it or any other position at all in the last couple of years, SIGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. Kama Sutra
Americans need new skills!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wow..mucho to write
Yes...Marriage protection week, which started on Sunday, Oct. 12, is also the same day that Matthew Shepard died a few years ago. He has the gall and unmitigated temerity to discriminate against homosexuals on such a day? What a prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yes...someone reminded me about that earlier
and the fact that I already did a prime quality rant about 'special rights' in the days after Matt Shepard's murder:

http://www.plaidder.com/shep.htm

All still true, God help this country,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Also, wasn't Oct. 11th coming out day?
Your essay rocked, Plaid Adder. The whole week is an insult, no matter what one's sexual orientation is. And I don't understand how it can motivate anyone but homophobes to celebrate the institution of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are Fundamentalists Trying To PREVENT Hetero Atheists From Getting Married
... it would only make sense. After all, atheists CERTAINLY don't see marriage as a "sacred institution", right? Hetero atheists who marry are only in it for the LEGAL PROTECTIONS and LEGAL BENEFITS.

How selfish!!

If the fundies aren't against this... why not? To be entirely consistent, they ought to be. --- They are protecting the SANCTITY of marriage, aren't they? It's "sacred", isn't it?

Puh-leeze. The HYPOCRISY is just mind boggling.

This is yet another assault on queer America from the Christian fundamentalists and the office-holding fundamentalists.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Congrats Plaid Adder, your point is sucinct and hole-in-one!
Re: Dumbo's protection racket week.....sound like maybe Sharon Bush is about to accept an offer she can't refuse and tell everyone on primetime why she's divorcing Neil......

OR...... something nasty in the pipeline about Pickles and the matrimonical pact in the W.H.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. when is wealthy white male day?
Just curious i have to buy presents to ppl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Ummm...
...when is it NOT wealthy white male day?

Later,
JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. LOLOL!
Right on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. They ought to call it
"Protection from All Those Nasty Gay and Lesbian Couples who Want to Cut into the Profit Margin Week."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Another good essay from Plaid Adder
Keep 'em coming.

Whether our rightwing friends like it or not, any committed nontraditional family is a family; any government-licensed union between a man and a woman without commitment is not.

Perhaps that says a lot for Rousseau's thoughts on man in a state of nature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. As a 38-year old straight
gal who's never been married, I agree with you totally. From my perspective, however, my problem is that I'm really really REALLY tired of people thinking there's something "wrong" with me because I've never been married. Like I don't have a "real" life unless I'm married!

There's a lot of discrimination against singles in the legal, administrative, employment, economic, and social realms that most married people are totally unaware of. And this is such a couples-oriented society that it doesn't take much to make singles like me feel very small and unimportant, even if we're parents, which I am (I have a 12-year-old son).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. You're UN-Married... And Have a CHILD??? HORRORS!!!
What kind of evil cruel heartless person are you?
How can you look at yourself in the mirror?
You need a man to make your life complete.
You need a man to be a strong masculine role-model for your son.
You don't want him growing up to be a sissy now, do you?
Who takes out the garbage and mows the lawn?
What will the neighbors think?

:hi:
Luv ya, Lib!

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thanks, Allen!
Hey, ya wanna get the repuke fundies off my back and volunteer to be that man they claim I'm not a woman without? I'll even let you get on DU for several hours a day instead of mowing or painting or taking out the garbage or cleaning the garage or fixing the car (or paying to fix the car!), etc., etc. Deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Sure... I'll Bring Over My John Deere And Mow...
... and paint... and empty the garbage.

Need your oil changed? I can do that too. Plumbing? No problem!

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Okay, sounds good, but
what about certain other "services?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Just guessing here...
But I wouldn't hold my breath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Snarf! You mean like backrubs, foot massages, and cooking?
Sure! I'll do those "extra services" as well. No extra charge.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. heterosexual marriage is so sacred
that we make television reality and game shows out of it :eyes:

Have to credit my sister for that one.

The crazy idea that someone else's relationship diminishes your relationship is insane.

Peace Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. By keeping my foot strongly on the forehead of the working
class:

Marriage is a sacred institution, and its protection is essential to the continued strength of our society. Marriage Protection Week provides an opportunity to focus our efforts on preserving the sanctity of marriage and on building strong and healthy marriages in America. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman, and my Administration is working to support the institution of marriage by helping couples build successful marriages and be good parents."


Spew! It's hard enough to raise our children without financial woes, which cause marital crisis. How can people be "good parents" when we aren't ever home because the economy stinks and we need to work eight jobs to put food in our children's tummies.

This makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Exactly!
Marriage Protection Week. Nice to know Idiot Boy has his priorities straight(pun intended). Just more pandering from the unelected MorAn. Oh Man, I hope he doesn't manage to steal his way into the WH again. I can't take any more of his pandering BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. If they REALLY want to accomplish something...
...they would skip this BS and add the American Middle Class and American Information Tech Worker to the Endangered Species List

Later,
JM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, I am CERTAINLY relieved.
Here I was biting my fingernails to beyond the quick and starting to wet the bed again because my marriage was unprotected and these nice people come along and want to protect it for me.

"The sacred institution of marriage is under attack. There are those who want to redefine marriage to include two men, or two women, or a group of any size or mix of sexes: One man and four women, one woman and two men, etc. If they fail to secure legal protection classifying these arrangements as 'marriage,' they want to include all these mixtures under the definition of 'civil union,' giving them identical standing with the marriage of one man and one woman."

Well, all I can say is just "YUCK". That is the ickiest thing I ever heard of. eeuuuwwwww

Then I learned THIS!:

"They have gained the support of the national media and many politicians. Their efforts are intended to force, by law, 97% of Americans to bow down to the desires of the approximately 3% who are homosexuals."http://www.marriageprotectionweek.com/default.asp

Well...I for one will NEVER bow down to them. Nossir. Not me. Never. Not the bowing down kind. Nope. If you'd like to send a thank you message to the American Family Association, sponsors of Marriage Protection Week, go here: http://www.afa.net/contact.asp
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. OW! MY EYES!
Damn you, trof! I looked at that "marriageprotectionweek.com" site and now I've been blinded by the right!

Not blinded so much as revolted...jeez, people, if we only account for 3% of the population, why are you so fucking SCARED of us?

:grr:

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'm hetero, Plaid Adder,
and I've always wondered that myself, just what is it, exactly, that makes everyone so angry about and frightened of homosexuality? I've never understood the big deal myself, other than the usual fundies who spout the usual biblical nonsense which, as a liberal Christian, I can honestly say is a bunch of bullshit and a ridiculous misinterpretation.

But even those who aren't fundies or who don't believe in the Bible have this intrinsic hatred, distrust, and fear of gays and I've never been able to quite figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Well, if you ever figure it out, we can finally find a cure!
Woudln't that be nice...

Really, I don't know what it is that gets people so het up about it. But het up they certainly are. As I was saying to my partner in perversity earlier today, the whole "force us to bow down to their desires" thing is really very telling from a Freudian point of view. It's like they feel that somehow, if they live in a society where homosexuality is acceptable, it will immediately become mandatory, and they will be FORCED to have same-sex marriages whether they like it or not.

The most interesting commentary on this phenomenon came from a right-wing pundit called the Reverend Cameron who one day, on some show or other, found himself expressing the theory that if we didn't stigmatize homosexuality it woudl eventually replace heterosexuality because 'let's face it, marital sex tends toward the boring.'

His words, not mine, folks. The good Reverend Cameron believes that homosexual sex would simply wipe the floor with heterosexual sex if it were all down to sheer orgasmic power, because homosexual sex is just, well, more fun. I mean, *I* certainly think it's more fun...but that's cause I'm a lesbian. This Cameron guy is supposedly straight--why is he running down his own people that way?

But that is the basic function of all forms of homophobia: to try to prevent people from acknowledging, accepting, and acting on their homosexuality by making being gay as unpleasant as it can be. And you know what, on one level, that tactic works very well. There are a lot of gay people who get into straight marriages because they are just too daunted by trying to live as gay people. Similarly, there are a lot of people who might be gay, but have been so terrorized about the possibility that they simply shut down altogether and have no real sexual life at all. With enough power, you can beat people into the closet.

And maybe that's why they're afraid--they know that they have done it to us, and so they are always expecting the payback, the moment at which we turn around and do it to them. The idea that we might not actually care to exact that particular kind of revenge does not occur to them. Because that would involve their realizing that they are not universally desirable, and that in fact, most gay people might not WANT some snivelling fundie wacko to bow down before their desires.

Ah well,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Great Marriage Protection Week idea from another LJer:
She's writing a letter to Bush explaining that what her marriage really needs protection from is employers who want to be able to work her more than 40 hours a week without paying her overtime.

Make it a national campaign, I say! Straight spouses of America, write to the White House and tell them which piece of life-and-liberty-destroying capitalist thievery you woudl like YOUR marriage protected from!

:argh:

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Does this apply to Neil Bush who partied with Oriental hookers?
Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. A personal story
Three years ago my family was barbecuing and gossiping about all the relatives. (My partner and I, being 500 miles away, were not in attendance.) The topic got around to marriage and the fact that, most of the 75 people or so who we call close relatives had, let's say, marital issues.

"But you know who has the best marriage in our family?" one brother asked. And, yes, it was us. US. The lesbians. I heard that my family had one of those cathartic bouts of laughter that ended with tears in their eyes.

My partner and I want to marry in every place that will allow us until someday we can live as a married couple in our hometown.

We are planning a Canadian wedding. She wants a quiet cruise to Nova Scotia. I favor a big family event in Ontario. It's looking like she might prevail -- the family politics is just too cumbersome.

I mean, we should have the right not to invite an uncle if he is an annoying homophobe, shouldn't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. My Letter To The "President"
-- Dear Mr. "President,"

I assume, since you are so interested in protecting the institution
of marriage, that you will be shortly issuing an Executive Order
banning all divorces and re-marriages during Marriage Protection
Week.

You really do not specify exactly what, however, you seek to
protect the institution of marriage FROM. And I'd like to know what the
real enemy of the institution of marriage is, that you feel it necessary
to make such a proclamation.

Is it more harmful to the institution of marriage that a gay couple
that honestly loves one another be allowed to marry each other in a
CIVIL UNION...(no church is forced to recognize if it does not so
choose to) or is it more harmful to the institution of marriage that a
heterosexual man can marry, divorce, and remarry as many times as he
wishes?

You know, Mr. "President"...I have to say this ...

This has absolutely nothing to do with "family values" or "Christian
morals." Be honest. The real reason you oppose gay marriage is that
homosexuality GROSSES YOU OUT!! Isn't that right, Mr. "President?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Dont Forget Highest Divorce Rates Week!!
Edited on Mon Oct-13-03 11:33 AM by Mari333
Guess who ! thats right, Baptists!


Twenty seven percent of those describing themselves as born-again
Christians are currently or have previously been divorced, compared to 24
percent among other adults.

"While it may be alarming to discover that born-again Christians are more
likely than others to experience a divorce, that pattern has been in
place for quite some time," said George Barna, president of Barna
Research Group. >>>>



http://www.divorcereform.org/mel/rbaptisthigh.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Hmmm...
Rush and Newt alone have each made a very solid contribution to the marriage failure rate. Maybe it's a RW thing as well as a born-again thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I know gay couples who have been together for 30 years
faithful and true..
the Hypocrisy amongst the evangelical homophobes is astounding..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. All my gay and lesbian friends
have been trying to break up my marriage for the last seventeen years!
Thank you, Mr. Bush, for protecting me from those bad people!

Seriously though - My wife and I have no children - is our marriage even legitimate by Bush's standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudicea Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. You're so lucky, PA
I've had two straight marriages (1.5 yrs and 5 yrs) and one lesbian partnership (6 yrs) in between the two. Now I'm solo and lonesome. Some of us should just stay single, I guess, but I wish I wasn't one of them. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
38. Well said
And congratulations to you and your partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. Listened to fundie radio today
And boy was it a riot. If we allow gay marriage, it will the end of civilization, God's wrath, blah blah armageddoncakes, dogs and cats living together, etc.

Personally, I'm a bi woman living in sin with a straight (but not narrow) guy, and we're doing just fine--we're Pagans and our religion just doesn't give a shit.

As the bumper sticker says, they need to focus on their own damn families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yeah, Arnold Schwarzenegger for example.
Arny the Cheat, Republican Hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
42. Do you think he means he's ready to SUPPORT
couples when things are WORSE, not better; when one or both are now POORER, not richer; when one or both have been stricken with SICKNESS, not health, when he's divided them from each other, from their children/families, and from their communities by his infamous lies; by the loss of married workers' ability to support their families at home, by pre-emptive war, the cost of which will burden our children, and by tyranny against our Constitution?

NOT! A case of treason and abuse of office, plain and simple!!!!

OK - Pack your bags, George, and get out of the (White)House or your stuff will be on the lawn tonight! America's going to file for divorce. You and your fundie party faithful and media whores have caused quite enough grief, and you may take your sorry body and soul elsewhere. Your immaturity in leadership and adolescent rage caused this rift, George. Counseling has not led to any changes in your arrogant narcissitic attitude. Your friends are addicts. Your promises are empty. Unfortunately, the consequences of your actions may hinder America for the rest of her life, but after asking the Dear Abby/Ann Landers $1M question: I know that we'll be better off without you!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. This makes me sick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC