Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scooter waived his right to a speedy trial--That's good for us

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:03 AM
Original message
Scooter waived his right to a speedy trial--That's good for us
The judge set a February status hearing to review motions and possibly set a trial date. Brings this case closer to 2006 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't mean a thing
It's never going to trial, that's my prediction.

Presidential Pardon, the breakfast of fucks. You watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you can;t pardon someone until they're convicted, tho---right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsdsharp Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wrong.
Weinberger hadn't gone to trial when Poppy pardoned him. Nixon wasn't even charged with anything when Ford pardoned him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. sorry. they don't even need to be charged. remember nixon....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Wrong, sorry
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 11:57 AM by OldLeftieLawyer
Read about what Poppy Fuckface did with Cap Weinberger and the other Iran-Contra thugs on Christmas Eve, 1992, and then read about Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon, who was an unindicted co-conspirator.

A pardon can take place even without an indictment. A mighty powerful tool the President has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Look what happened in Ky when Gov Ernie Fletcher pardoned
everyone staff member indicted, then granted blanket amnesty to the rest. His numbers dropped like a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'll watch and bookmark this thread
If your prediction is correct, I will ask for the next powerball numbers from you. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Ask for them now...Old Leftie has been right on the money
so far on these proceedings/matters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. If he pardons, I predict an uproar.
I don't think this meathead would get away with a pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. But,
I'm feeling especially demonic today -

Wouldn't you love to see him try it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. OK, I'll meet you at the same old place
Not to be confused with the old same place.

I'll bring the goat blood. You bring the pitchfork.

"i command thee Satan that thou est bring me the head of Scooter..."

<snaps out of it>

On a serious note, I would do cartwheels if DimSon used the Presidential Pardon, or "pee-pee" as we say. I keep thinking, however, that Fitzgerald knows this as well, and is structuring the case accordingly. Is this scenario possible, or does "pee-pee" trump anything Fitzgerald could preemptively do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I can't bring the pitchfork
I'm using it for transportation while the broom is in the shop.

It's not Scooter's head I want, and neither do you. Admit it, Dorothy.

Thank you for putting that vulgar, disrespectful, unforgettable abbreviation in my hitherto pristine head. Does it make you happy to know that I'll never again be able to read "Presidential pardon" without thinking of toilet-training my kids?

Now for the sad truth: The Presidential Pardon Power Is Absolute.

No appeal. No justification need be given. Nothing. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution. It's absolute.

Fitzgerald would be immediately halted, I believe.

I'll get myself over to the same old place, but this pitchfork doesn't have the dash that the broom does, so feel free to start without me.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I was afraid of that
Just hoping that one of those "law heads" that I used to sell, um, stuff to would know an end run.

BTW, if you shave just a wee bit off the cylinder heads and re-gap the plugs the pitchfork will haul ass.

Make me happy? Hell, I'm beside myself.

Regards,

Jekyll/Hyde
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Straight razor
or electric?

WAIT.

What about a depilatory?

Thank you.

Portia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Random orbit air sander

Testosterone is the order of the day.


Bluto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Oh
That's what I call a "hair dryer." Right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. If it is, your "iron" must be a sight to behold

I'm all a-flutter.

Call us if you ever venture west of the Beltway - even though we don't smoke, drink, or eat meat, we still are snappy dinner guests. Mrs. DB has gotten the "I apologize for his behavior" part down pat.

"The sun is going down."
"No, no my boy, the horizon is moving up."

"Let's stand him on his head!"
"You see, now it's morning."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. You are definitely "on"
We're really tame, honest.

Old Yeller has nothing to say about politics, having been trained well and early by the Chinese government, but he does a marvelous job of cleaning up the broken crockery when the discussions get out of hand.

Wouldn't George Orwell be proud?

What's an "iron"?

Is that like a "mop"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. I predict Bush won't give a flying "fig" about an uproar,
he'll do it anyway. He DOESN'T care. At all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I agree
And, really, wouldn't it be something to see what the fallout would be?

He's really in a terrible situation right now, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, damned for all eternity in hellfire that will blister his skin, causing him screaming pain and agony as all the souls of the dead whose lives he took in his worthless invasion of Iraq applaud.

I'm sorry. I lost it in that last line................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. I was right there with ya,
ESPECIALLY in the last line..LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Why would he? He is going to retire in luxury for the rest of his life.
He could care less what anyone thinks. And he doesn't
care if he hurts his own party either. He will pardon Libby and
all the crooks, not because he cares about them, but because he is buying their silence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. Oh he can pardon and he will
nice hanuckah gift, but you are right, there will be an uproar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Old Lefty:
Isn't there a loophole we can use to stop Bush from pardoning his own people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Nope
The Constitution gives him the power. It's unassailable.

Article 2, Section 2. Except for impeachment - which makes sense - it's an absolute power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I have to agree also that this won't go to trial,
but I do have a question and I'm really not sure how legal (or ethical for that matter) concerning evidence Fitzgerald has now that Libby has entered his plea.

My question would be that now that the plea has been entered would Fitzgerald make evidence available (albeit only limited evidence) that could possible force Libby into a deal prior to a Presidential pardon or perhaps evidence that would show that the pardon was done solely to protect others from prosecution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sure
It's called "discovery," and that's where both sides show each other what they've got.

Now, as I understand it - I may be wrong, so keep that in mind - Libby's lawyers will have to get top-secret security clearances in order to do the proper discovery for his defense. That will take time, and could complicate the matter a whole hell of a lot. I do not have the slightest idea how that squares with what Fitzgerald's already got - which is testimony.

And, that would possibly trigger the ostensible grounds for a Presidential pardon - that national security was being compromised.

Here's the big trick about Presidential pardons: the President needs no excuse to grant one. He owes no one an explanation. It's an absolute right, requiring no public justification.

Article 2, Section 2 of our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes, both his lawyers are applying for clearance
MSNBC says it will take 3-4 weeks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. thanks,
Knowing that the President needs no justification for a Presidential pardon could it be possible (if provable) that the pardon in and of itself is an obstruction of justice if Fitzgerald has not concluded his investigation?

I'm thinking this in terms of Iran/Contra in which the pardons effectively shut down the Congressional investigation. But given that this is a criminal investigation does that change the scope of the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. No
A Presidential pardon is a Constitutionally guaranteed right of the President, and can never be construed as a crime.

As I've posted elsewhere in this thread, a pardon of Libby would completely halt Fitzgerald's investigation. That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. thank you,
read too many of your posts concerning this to dispute your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You're very kind,
and you're welcome.

(You ask great, and really easy, questions.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. you're to thank
your insight into the realities of the situation is (at least from my perspective) very helpful.

If I may ask then (and please correct me) it seems that this will ultimately end up being a political issue for the Dem's in that they will use the pardon as a rallying cry for abuses that this administration has inflicted upon us. Is that a fair statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Fair, indeed
I think it would go far beyond the Democrats, though, as the Republicans who are already deserting the sinking ship that appears to be the Oval Office would be the first (hypocrites) to add their lusty voices to the uproar of outrage.

Oh, I think it would be a grand move for the Democrats. It might - I'm just saying - be the wake-up call Americans need. But, on the other hand, it might galvanize the already-brain-dead supporters of Fuckface, who would bleat his line about "preserving national security" or whatever crap he'd spew when the pardon(s) is issued.

That's why I'd love to see the little squirt do it. Just to see what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. as would I
but my fear is that if the trial manages to go past the midterms then all the outcries would ultimately fall on deaf ears (assuming that the Republicans maintain their majority). I really don't see where a Republican majority would hold him responsible given their leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. I'm with OldLeftieLawyer
I think, given the problems BushBot & Friends are having (with finding the word "integrity" in the dictionary)that a pardon would create a backlash. Repugs (happily) will get swept out.

Also, the criminal investigation of Libby stops dead (with a PP), but that doesn't remove Rove or Cheney from the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. It's possible that Shrub will pardon Scooty-boot.
But with Shrub's ratings tanking at 35%, Shrub would wait till 2008, I would think.

At the federal level, trials can move with lightning speed. Obviously this one won't be quite so fast. BUT it's hard to imagine pretrial matters at the federal level lasting for THREE YEARS.

That means that some time between now and winter 2008, Scooty-boot is going to have to publicly face the music. Suppose his trial is finally ready to go in 2007. Since Fitzgerald has a strong case against him on some if not all of the indictments, Scooty-poo might still might end up spending some months in jail. I guess it depends on what might happen with an appeal bond.

I firmly believe that ANY amount of time in jail, no matter how small, is unacceptable to Scooty-boot, who is still a white collar, middle class, criminal-record-free guy. Such people see a lot of symbolic meaning in going to jail and wearing prison clothes, and they fight like hell to avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Fitzgerald says the trial would take roughly 2 weeks. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sounds about right, given Fitzgerald's insistence on sticking
strictly to the offenses charged, and trying not to get into the larger picture of the con game that was played to lead stupid us into war.

But that's okay. I have faith in media people--at least bloggers--to keep this matter in the forefront, and to bring up the larger con game, hopefully on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Hard to imagine anything taking so long?
Consider Enron and Ken Lay. Think about THAT. This stuff can move at a glacial pace.

There will be no trial. It's simply politically impossible. And if you think polls and Fuckface's approval rating means anything to him, I would guess that you're momentarily forgetting what an arrogant prick he is and what an arrogant bunch of pricks surround him.

Jail's not even in the picture. Just as a trial isn't in the picture.

That's my bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Libby Pardon = Cat 5 hurricane
I am starting to think Bush will cut him loose. Unpopular Cheney is dragging the poor boy down. At some point Libby is going to wake up -- Sure dick promised to save me, but will bush follow though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Remember that ancient Chinese curse?
No, no, not my husband.

The other one.

"May you live in interesting times."

Imagine if Fuckface pardoned Libby. I mean, honestly, I'd pay to see that, but I'm a bit depraved like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. you're right -- it does have great potential
personally I am seeing no real good way out of this for Bush/Cheney.

Trial -- Dick and Rove under oath not good
Plea bargain -- Libby has to give something in return not good
Pardon -- really not good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Look out--Scooty-boot's lawyer is repeating the trick that worked
so well for them in the first place. "There will be many First Amendment issues which must be litigated, because reporters will be told to give up notes, etc."

Scooty-boot's lawyer wants to draw out this litigation to delay, delay, delay. Delays are ALWAYS good for the defendant (as long as he is out on bail) in a criminal trial.

But fortunately there may be a glitch. It is the REPORTERS/MEDIA who have standing to raise the 1st Amendment issue and try to draw out the litigation about turning over their notes, etc. NOT Scooty-boot and his lawyer.

Will the media fuck us over once again? Will they needlessly drag this case out by fighting every order to turn over notes, etc.?

We need to pay attention to which media does this, and BOYCOTT THEM, and TELL them we are boycotting them, until they cut through the crap and get this matter moving to a public trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Then he IS guilty...
In my limited experience in this sort of thing, I've always been under the impression that only the truly guilty "waive time" as it's called, as it works to the defendant's benefit. Am I correct in this? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. This will not go to trial. Scoot will get pardoned, with lots of $$$ in
bank from his repug friends. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. Delay, delay, delay.
Libby will wait until the last possible moment, enter a plea, serve a few months in Club Fed, and * will pardon him on the way out saying "he's done enough time".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
42. Pardon won't happen.
Republicans are already fighting for their lives to hold congress. It could never be done before that election. I wouldn't be surprised his own party would be furious about it.

Also, phase two will continue the bleeding or maybe cut an artery. If that happens, Bush won't be able to have a breakfast lunch that anybody would attend.

Won't happen. This meltdown is not at the end of the damage like when other pardons were given. This class action republican unveiling is just getting started.

The election is the third rail. It's suicide if he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Agree
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC